Pionex scores 12 points above HaasOnline, on availability rather than any published criterion. Pionex ranks #2 and HaasOnline #7 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
PIPionex68
vs
HaasOnline56
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #2 and #7 of 9
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6856+12.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Pionex leads on no published criterion; HaasOnline is ahead on custody. The gap comes from availability.
PionexScore 68Built-in bot exchange — trading bots without API-key setupStrength: Beginners trying bot trading without API-key setupWatch-out: Custodial — Pionex holds your funds while bots executeHaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactPionexHaasOnline
PricingSnapshotBuilt-in bots carry no separate subscription or activation fee. Every order a bot fills pays the trading fee for that market. The Pionex fee schedule lists spot maker 0.050% and taker 0.050%, leveraged tokens 0.100% and 0.100%, and futures maker 0.020% and taker 0.050%, with lower fees for VIP tiers. A completed grid cycle pays fees on both the buy and the sell fill, and perpetual futures add funding. Custodial: Pionex is the exchange, and its terms allow it to place user assets with external providers ‘to custody and safekeep all or part of your digital assets’. US users trade on Webot (formerly Pionex.US), whose fee page states taker 0.5% and maker 0.1%. The May 2025 multistate consent order previously cited could not be re-read at a primary source on 14 September 2026 and is not asserted here.Monthly by card: Starter $19.99, Standard $49.99, Pro $99.99, TradeServer (self-hosted or managed) $249.99; Enterprise on request. Annual by card is 16% off ($16.79 / $41.99 / $83.99 / $209.99 a month; $201.50 / $503.90 / $1,007.90 / $2,519.90 a year). Paying the year once in crypto is 40% off ($11.99 / $29.99 / $59.99 / $149.99 a month; $143.93 / $359.93 / $719.93 / $1,799.93), settled in Bitcoin via BTCPay. Yearly crypto plans are not refundable, and monthly card plans refund no unused time. A 7-day trial with every Standard feature needs no card. Only TradeServer keeps keys on your own infrastructure; Starter to Pro run in HaasOnline’s cloud. Re-read 2026-09-14: the page defaults to annual crypto billing, and the $11.99–$149.99 figures previously recorded as monthly prices are the crypto-annual rates.
Asset coverageEditorialSpot pairs across major and mid-cap assets; 16 native bot typesAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; HaasScript supports arbitrary strategy logic
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
PI
Pionex
68#2 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pionex leads on no published criterion; its edge is availability (20 vs 14 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
Strength
Beginners trying bot trading without API-key setup
Tradeoff
Custodial — Pionex holds your funds while bots execute
HaasOnline
56#7 of 9
Pick it when
Pick HaasOnline if custody matters most — it scores 7/10 to Pionex's 3/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Technical users building custom strategies
Tradeoff
Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
PIPionexLeads
Pionex leads HaasOnline on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
PionexScore 68Built-in bot exchange — trading bots without API-key setupStrength: Beginners trying bot trading without API-key setupWatch-out: Custodial — Pionex holds your funds while bots execute
HaasOnline
Choose HaasOnline if custody matters most
Custody: 7/10 against 3/10 for Pionex (weight 30)
True cost: 6/10 against 4/10 for Pionex (weight 26)
Capability: 9/10 against 4/10 for Pionex (weight 24)
HaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
by 4 of 10weight 7.2 of 86HaasOnline leads
Pionex3/10 out of 10
HaasOnline7/10 out of 10
True cost
by 2 of 10weight 6.2 of 86HaasOnline leads
Pionex4/10 out of 10
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Capability
by 5 of 10weight 5.8 of 86HaasOnline leads
Pionex4/10 out of 10
HaasOnline9/10 out of 10
Reliability
weight 4.8 of 86Tie
Pionex6/10 out of 10
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Pionex20/20HaasOnline14/20
Pionex leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Pionex9.8/30HaasOnline16.8/30
HaasOnline leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Pionex6.7/10HaasOnline2.7/10
Pionex leads
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Pionex3.2/8HaasOnline3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Pionex8.3/18HaasOnline6.9/18
Pionex leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Pionex unless the term HaasOnline leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick HaasOnline if custody matters most — it scores 7/10 to Pionex's 3/10 there (weight 30).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (Pionex 6/10, HaasOnline 6/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Pionex scores 12 points above HaasOnline, on availability rather than any published criterion. Published scores, out of 100: Pionex 68 (rank 2 of 9 trading bots), HaasOnline 56 (rank 7 of 9).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
