Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Wallets

Phantom vs Sparrow Wallet Phantom leads by 10 points.

Phantom scores 10 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record. Phantom ranks #4 and Sparrow Wallet #7 of 11 published wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Phantom78
Sparrow Wallet68
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #4 and #7 of 11
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-PHANTOM-VS-SPARROW-WALLET-cbd23ab6
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Phantom leads by 10 points

Phantom scores 10 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record.

Phantom #4 of 1178
Sparrow Wallet #7 of 1168
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termPhantom leads on 3 of 4 published criteria; Sparrow Wallet on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermPhantomSparrow WalletWeightPoints
Clear signing7/105/107.2+3.7for Phantom+1.9 of 32
Key export8/106/106.7+3.5for Phantom+1.8 of 32
Incident record8/105/105.8+4.5for Phantom+2.3 of 32
Account recovery7/109/104.3−2.2for Sparrow Wallet−1.2 of 32
Net of the terms+9.5
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+9.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7868+10.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

3 of 4 rows read the same for both.
FactPhantomSparrow Wallet
PricingSnapshotSwap fees, from help.phantom.com/articles/5985106844435 (fetched 28 October 2026): Phantom fee "0.85%, applies to most swaps. Some flows, such as deposits to your perps balance, and swaps from USDC , USDT , USDG , PYUSD into your Cash account, do not carry this fee." Network fee "Varies, and may be sponsored if the swap is gasless." The same page sets a floor: "Cross-chain swaps and swaps on Robinhood Chain may have a minimum of $2 (USD value)." The client itself is free: "Download Phantom for free on iOS, Android, or as a browser extension at phantom.com/download ." (help.phantom.com/articles/36482144712083, fetched 28 October 2026). Cash-account rails are priced separately on help.phantom.com/articles/44800531617939 (fetched 28 October 2026): add cash by debit card "1.75%", credit card "3.50%", direct deposit from a US bank account "0.30%", domestic wire from a US bank account "1.00%", standard ACH withdrawal "Free", fast ACH withdrawal "$1.00 flat + 0.75% (min $1.50)"."Sparrow is licensed under the Apache 2 software licence." (sparrowwallet.com/download/, fetched 28 October 2026). The download page lists installers for Windows, macOS and Linux with no price, and the site asks for donations. The features page lists no in-app swap or purchase; the only cost of a payment is the network fee, chosen against the fee chart Sparrow shows.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotglobalglobal
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your keySelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your key
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Phantom

78#4 of 11
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Phantom if clear signing matters most — it scores 7/10 to Sparrow Wallet's 5/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Key export — 8/10
Tradeoff
Read 'Understanding Phantom KMS' before you commit, because the wallet a new user actually gets is not the wallet the reviews describe. The documented default is "create a new wallet with Google or Apple", and those wallets run on Phantom KMS, where "Wallet keys are stored remotely in a secure enclave, not on your device" and "the Show Private Key option is not available for these accounts." Every signature on that account is a request to Phantom's KMS API, authorised in a vendor-run Policy Engine enclave before a Signer enclave returns the signature - and no published audit covers KMS, because the audit repository has not been pushed since 2024-07-05. Since the August 2026 migration your Google or Apple account is the single factor protecting the wallet, and the vendor's own documentation has not caught up: one page (2026-08-15) says the four-digit PIN is gone while three others (2026-06-12, 2026-07-12 and the 2026-08-16 sign-in page itself) still require or prompt for it. The mitigation is real, portable and easy to skip: export the 12-word BIP-39 phrase from Settings > Security & Privacy > Show Recovery Phrase the day you install, because Phantom states it "works in any compatible wallet app" and, without it, "If you are logged out of Phantom on all devices and can't access your Google or Apple account, your wallet cannot be recovered." Two further traps: restoring by Google or Apple "restores only your first account automatically, regardless of how many accounts your wallet had before", so a multi-account user should restore from the phrase instead; and if you want keys on your own device from the start you must onboard on the browser extension, because a recovery-phrase wallet cannot be created in the mobile app at all.

Sparrow Wallet

68#7 of 11
Pick it when
Pick Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most — it scores 9/10 to Phantom's 7/10 there (weight 18).
Strength
Recovery exit — 9/10
Tradeoff
Sparrow is desktop-only and Bitcoin-only, and it is built for users who want to see every input and output: a newcomer should expect a transaction editor, not a one-tap send. No Sparrow page documents exporting a single private key (read 2026-10-28), and its security policy says "There is currently no bug bounty programme for Sparrow." It has published no security advisory and no fund-loss incident was found.
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

PhantomLeads

Choose Phantom if clear signing matters most

  • Clear signing: 7/10 against 5/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 30)
  • Key export: 8/10 against 6/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 28)
  • Incident record: 8/10 against 5/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 24)
Sparrow Wallet

Choose Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most

  • Account recovery: 9/10 against 7/10 for Phantom (weight 18)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Key export

by 2 of 10weight 6.7 of 86Phantom leads
Phantom8 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet6 out of 10

Clear signing

by 2 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Phantom leads
Phantom7 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet5 out of 10

Incident record

by 3 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Phantom leads
Phantom8 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet5 out of 10

Account recovery

by 2 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Sparrow Wallet leads
Phantom7 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet9 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Phantom14/20Sparrow Wallet14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Phantom18/30Sparrow Wallet14.4/30
Phantom leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Phantom2.7/10Sparrow Wallet2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Phantom3.2/8Sparrow Wallet3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Phantom8.3/18Sparrow Wallet8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Phantom unless the term Sparrow Wallet leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most — it scores 9/10 to Phantom's 7/10 there (weight 18).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Can I export my own keys and use them elsewhere? · 28% (Phantom 8/10, Sparrow Wallet 6/10)
    Scored by Can I see exactly what I am signing? · 30% (Phantom 7/10, Sparrow Wallet 5/10)
    Scored by What has gone wrong, and did they publish it? · 24% (Phantom 8/10, Sparrow Wallet 5/10)
    Scored by If I lose my device, how do I get back in? · 18% (Phantom 7/10, Sparrow Wallet 9/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Phantom scores 10 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record. Published scores, out of 100: Phantom 78 (rank 4 of 11 wallets), Sparrow Wallet 68 (rank 7 of 11).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed
Re-read in progressOverdue; re-read by 10 November 2026.
Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research