Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Hardware Wallets

OneKey vs Keycard Shell Same published score.

Keycard Shell and OneKey tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them. OneKey ranks #7 and Keycard Shell #6 of 23 published hardware wallets. The ledger below shows where each side is ahead — pick by the criterion that matters to you.

OneKey69
Keycard Shell69
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #7 and #6 of 23
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 6 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-ONEKEY-VS-KEYCARD-SHELL-af5dc9aa
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Same published score — 69 each

Keycard Shell and OneKey tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them.

OneKey #7 of 2369
Keycard Shell #6 of 2369
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termKeycard Shell leads on 0 of 6 published criteria; OneKey on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermKeycard ShellOneKeyWeightPoints
No published term separates the two — every criterion cell and every score dimension is equal.
Net of the terms0.0
Reproduced gap0.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactOneKeyKeycard Shell
One-time priceSnapshotOneKey Classic 1S Pure at $79; the BTC-Only edition is the same price. The Offer on https://onekey.so/products/onekey-classic-1s-pure/ reads "price":"79.00", read 1 October 2026.Keycard Shell (with two Keycards) at €129 including VAT (regular €149) on https://keycard.tech/products/keycard-shell, read 1 October 2026; no US dollar list price is published.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL6+ certified; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, EAL6+ certified; partly open source; air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

OneKey

69#7 of 23
Pick it when
OneKey leads Keycard Shell on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Secure element you can look up — 10/10
Tradeoff
Signing runs in closed secure-element firmware, so the rebuilt firmware stops short of the whole key path

Keycard Shell

69#6 of 23
Pick it when
Keycard Shell leads OneKey on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Secure element you can look up — 10/10
Tradeoff
First shipped in 2025, so it has a short record in buyers' hands
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

OneKey

OneKey leads Keycard Shell on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Keycard Shell

Keycard Shell leads OneKey on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Secure element

weight 6.5 of 86Tie
OneKey10 out of 10
Keycard Shell10 out of 10

Rebuildable firmware

weight 6.5 of 86Tie
OneKey7 out of 10
Keycard Shell7 out of 10

Genuine check

weight 2.9 of 86Tie
OneKey7 out of 10
Keycard Shell7 out of 10

Checkable keys

weight 2.9 of 86Tie
OneKey0 out of 10
Keycard Shell0 out of 10

Maker independence

weight 2.6 of 86Tie
OneKey10 out of 10
Keycard Shell10 out of 10

Fund-loss record

weight 2.6 of 86Tie
OneKey5 out of 10
Keycard Shell5 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
OneKey14/20Keycard Shell14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
OneKey17/30Keycard Shell17/30
Tie
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
OneKey2.7/10Keycard Shell2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
OneKey3.2/8Keycard Shell3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
OneKey5.5/18Keycard Shell5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Same published score — pick by the criterion that matters to you.

OneKey leads Keycard Shell on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

Keycard Shell leads OneKey on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (OneKey 10/10, Keycard Shell 10/10)
    Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (OneKey 7/10, Keycard Shell 7/10)
    Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (OneKey 7/10, Keycard Shell 7/10)
    Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (OneKey 0/10, Keycard Shell 0/10)
    Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (OneKey 10/10, Keycard Shell 10/10)
    Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (OneKey 5/10, Keycard Shell 5/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Keycard Shell and OneKey tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them. Published scores, out of 100: OneKey 69 (rank 7 of 23 hardware wallets), Keycard Shell 69 (rank 6 of 23).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research