Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Wallets

OKX Wallet vs Electrum Same published score.

Electrum and OKX Wallet tie on score at 66; the published tie-break orders them. OKX Wallet ranks #10 and Electrum #9 of 11 published wallets. The ledger below shows where each side is ahead — pick by the criterion that matters to you.

OKX Wallet66
Electrum66
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #10 and #9 of 11
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-OKX-WALLET-VS-ELECTRUM-3ba12ec0
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Same published score — 66 each

Electrum and OKX Wallet tie on score at 66; the published tie-break orders them.

OKX Wallet #10 of 1166
Electrum #9 of 1166
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termElectrum leads on 0 of 4 published criteria; OKX Wallet on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermElectrumOKX WalletWeightPoints
No published term separates the two — every criterion cell and every score dimension is equal.
Net of the terms0.0
Reproduced gap0.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

  • A row-above bound on one row means the criterion arithmetic does not reproduce the displayed gap exactly.
Quick facts

At a glance

3 of 4 rows read the same for both.
FactOKX WalletElectrum
PricingSnapshot"OKX DEX charges users a flat user interface fee for using the OKX DEX interface to access and conduct transactions on third-party DEXs." The published rates are 0% (Others <> Others), 0.1% (Group 1 <> Group 1), 0.25% (Group 1 <> Group 2) and 0.5% (Group 2 <> Group 2), and "No interface fee is charged on certain transactions, such as native-token wrap/unwrap, liquid staking, and protocol deposits/withdrawals from Aave protocol" (web3.okx.com/dex-fees, rendered 28 October 2026). Which group ETH and USDC fall in is set on a separate token-group page not read here. The wallet app itself carries no price, and network fees go to the chain: "OKX wallet doesn't charge this network fee and is unable to refund it." (okx.com/help/okx-wallet-faqs, fetched 28 October 2026)."Electrum is distributed under the MIT licence by Electrum Technologies GmbH." (electrum.org, fetched 28 October 2026). The same page is the download page for Linux, Windows, macOS and Android and states no price, subscription or service fee; the only cost of a payment is the network fee the user sets. Electrum has no in-app token swap; its submarine swaps between on-chain bitcoin and Lightning run through swap servers whose fees electrum.org does not state.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotglobalglobal
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your keySelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your key
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

OKX Wallet

66#10 of 11
Pick it when
OKX Wallet leads Electrum on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Key export — 6/10
Tradeoff
Two OKX Wallet set-ups behave differently. The seed-phrase wallet keeps keys on your device. The Social Login wallet (Google, Apple or email) keeps keys "in a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)" run by OKX, recovers through the social account, and has Auto-Confirm on by default, so market and limit orders are signed with no prompt (okx.com/en-eu/help/social-login-faq and what-is-auto-confirm-in-okx-wallet, read 2026-10-28). Exporting its seed permanently unlinks the social account. Swaps through OKX DEX carry an interface fee of 0% to 0.5% by token group.

Electrum

66#9 of 11
Pick it when
Electrum leads OKX Wallet on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Key export — 6/10
Tradeoff
Electrum does not create BIP-39 seeds. Its own seed format is published ("Electrum does not generate BIP39 seeds", electrum.readthedocs.io/en/latest/seedphrase.html, read 2026-10-28), but fewer wallets import it than import BIP-39, so check that the wallet you might move to reads Electrum seeds before relying on the phrase alone. Download it only from electrum.org: in December 2018 malicious servers pushed a fake "update" through the client's error popup, the maintainers disclosed it on their own repository (github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/4968), and versions from 3.3.3 on no longer render that text. Bitcoin only.
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

OKX Wallet

OKX Wallet leads Electrum on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Electrum

Electrum leads OKX Wallet on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Key export

weight 6.7 of 86Tie
OKX Wallet6 out of 10
Electrum6 out of 10

Clear signing

weight 7.2 of 86Tie
OKX Wallet5 out of 10
Electrum5 out of 10

Incident record

weight 5.8 of 86Tie
OKX Wallet6 out of 10
Electrum6 out of 10

Account recovery

weight 4.3 of 86Tie
OKX Wallet6 out of 10
Electrum6 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
OKX Wallet14/20Electrum14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
OKX Wallet13.7/30Electrum13.7/30
Tie
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
OKX Wallet2.7/10Electrum2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
OKX Wallet3.2/8Electrum3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
OKX Wallet8.3/18Electrum8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Same published score — pick by the criterion that matters to you.

OKX Wallet leads Electrum on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

Electrum leads OKX Wallet on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Can I export my own keys and use them elsewhere? · 28% (OKX Wallet 6/10, Electrum 6/10)
    Scored by Can I see exactly what I am signing? · 30% (OKX Wallet 5/10, Electrum 5/10)
    Scored by What has gone wrong, and did they publish it? · 24% (OKX Wallet 6/10, Electrum 6/10)
    Scored by If I lose my device, how do I get back in? · 18% (OKX Wallet 6/10, Electrum 6/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Electrum and OKX Wallet tie on score at 66; the published tie-break orders them. Published scores, out of 100: OKX Wallet 66 (rank 10 of 11 wallets), Electrum 66 (rank 9 of 11).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed
Re-read in progressOverdue; re-read by 10 November 2026.
Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research