Mercuryo vs Unlimit Crypto Mercuryo leads by 12 points.
Mercuryo scores 12 points above Unlimit Crypto, led by purchase cost, quote honesty, and KYC and speed. Mercuryo ranks #7 and Unlimit Crypto #11 of 16 published onramps. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
MEMercuryo57
vs
UNUnlimit Crypto45
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #7 and #11 of 16
Mercuryo scores 12 points above Unlimit Crypto, led by purchase cost, quote honesty, and KYC and speed.
MEMercuryo #7 of 1657
UNUnlimit Crypto #11 of 1645
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termMercuryo leads on 3 of 4 published criteria; Unlimit Crypto on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermMercuryoUnlimit CryptoWeightPoints
Purchase cost5/101/108.2+8.5for Mercuryo+4.4 of 32
Quote honesty4/102/106.2+3.2for Mercuryo+1.7 of 32
Named licence6/107/105.3−1.4for Unlimit Crypto−0.7 of 32
KYC and speed5/103/104.3+2.2for Mercuryo+1.2 of 32
Net of the terms+12.6
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+12.5
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below5745+12.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
MercuryoScore 57Multi-entity EU-focused widget rail — EEA crypto flow on Criptan Trade S.L.'s CNMV MiCA CASP (contracting via non-regulated Moneychurros S.L.), non-EEA on a Canadian FINTRAC MSB, UK FCA EMI for the e-money leg only — with a published CAPPED fee schedule (card up to 5.5% min EUR 1, SEPA up to 3% min EUR 2, average 3.95%) but an unquantified embedded spread, a partner-set 0-2% Infrastructure Fee, and a global-ToS rate struck at the execution moment.Strength: Licence identity — 6/10Watch-out: Outside the US the confirm-button number is not contractually binding: the global ToS strikes the rate 'at the execution moment', warns the final price 'may differ from the price specified when placing an order', forbids withdrawing a submitted order, embeds an unquantified spread in the displayed price, and lets each partner surface add a 0-2% Infrastructure Fee — so the same EUR 200 purchase costs materially different amounts depending on which widget integration you met.Unlimit CryptoScore 45Cyprus CySEC-authorised CASP onramp/offramp widget (Unlimit Crypto Ltd, 018/24, ΗΕ437355) whose ToS counterparty exactly matches the register — and whose price is unknowable in advance: no fee schedule exists anywhere, quotes live behind an authenticated API with no lock window, and the terms declare all orders final and non-refundable.Strength: Licence identity — 7/10Watch-out: You cannot know the price before you start and you have no refund right after you pay: no fee schedule exists anywhere on Unlimit's surfaces, the terms let the settled amount 'be different from the amounts presented to User', all orders are 'final and cannot be refunded/returned', Unlimit may cancel 'without advance notice... and without providing reason' — and your entire written recourse is a contact form and a complaint answered within 14 days under Cyprus law.
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactMercuryoUnlimit Crypto
PricingSnapshotMercuryo help article "How does Mercuryo calculate the price and fees for my transaction?" (article 30404513537565, last edited 15 July 2026; the HTML page returns HTTP 403 to non-browser clients and was read through the help-centre API, HTTP 200, fetched 29 September 2026). Mercuryo fee: "the fee ranges from 0% to 5.5%, with a minimum of €1 for smaller on-ramp/buy transactions"; Buy on-ramp (cards, mobile pay, alternative payment methods) "up to 5.5%, or min of €1"; Buy on-ramp (bank transfers) "up to 3%, or min of €2"; "Our average service fee is 3.95%." Non-EUR purchases: "an extra fee of 0.25% to 1% applies, depending on the chosen fiat currency". Partner Infrastructure Fee: "Typically ranging from 0% to 2%, never exceeding 5%." Spread: "The spread is embedded in the displayed crypto-asset price during checkout", with no percentage and no named benchmark. Network fee separate, not quantified. Worked example (our arithmetic, not a Mercuryo figure): a EUR 200 card purchase carries a Mercuryo fee of up to EUR 11.00 (5.5 percent cap) plus an Infrastructure Fee of typically up to EUR 4.00 and at most EUR 10.00, before spread and network fee; by bank transfer the Mercuryo fee is up to EUR 6.00 (3 percent cap). The global Terms of Service (mercuryo.io/legal/terms-global, Version 4.7.5) still state a flat buy fee of 3.95%, which does not match this capped schedule.No published fee schedule. Unlimit Crypto User Terms (PDF at https://cdn.unlimit.com/site-crypto/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/27064344/2025-06-Unl-Crypto_User-TC_06.2025.pdf, "Last updated: 27.06.2025"), fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, name fee types without a number: "Processing Fee is due for payment by User in Fiat." and "Any other fees that are applicable and effective at the time of User Order.", set "at the sole discretion of Unlimit Crypto" (section 5.1); "User Fees shall be presented to User prior to processing of User Order." (section 5.2). Numeric fees exist only per quote through the authenticated Get-a-quote API (fields processingFee, networkFee, markupFee on docs.gatefi.com). The former brand site www.crypto.unlimit.com, including /pricing/, now redirects (HTTP 301) to stable.com, an Unlimit-group stablecoin app whose User Terms (v2, 24.06.2026) also carry no onramp fee number. A EUR 200 all-in cannot be reconstructed from any published page.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshoteurope, us, caeurope, latam, africa
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
ME
Mercuryo
57#7 of 16
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Mercuryo if purchase cost matters most — it scores 5/10 to Unlimit Crypto's 1/10 there (weight 34).
Strength
Licence identity — 6/10
Tradeoff
Outside the US the confirm-button number is not contractually binding: the global ToS strikes the rate 'at the execution moment', warns the final price 'may differ from the price specified when placing an order', forbids withdrawing a submitted order, embeds an unquantified spread in the displayed price, and lets each partner surface add a 0-2% Infrastructure Fee — so the same EUR 200 purchase costs materially different amounts depending on which widget integration you met.
UN
Unlimit Crypto
45#11 of 16
Pick it when
Pick Unlimit Crypto if named licence matters most — it scores 7/10 to Mercuryo's 6/10 there (weight 22).
Strength
Licence identity — 7/10
Tradeoff
You cannot know the price before you start and you have no refund right after you pay: no fee schedule exists anywhere on Unlimit's surfaces, the terms let the settled amount 'be different from the amounts presented to User', all orders are 'final and cannot be refunded/returned', Unlimit may cancel 'without advance notice... and without providing reason' — and your entire written recourse is a contact form and a complaint answered within 14 days under Cyprus law.
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
MEMercuryoLeads
Choose Mercuryo if purchase cost matters most
Purchase cost: 5/10 against 1/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 34)
Quote honesty: 4/10 against 2/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 26)
KYC and speed: 5/10 against 3/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 18)
MercuryoScore 57Multi-entity EU-focused widget rail — EEA crypto flow on Criptan Trade S.L.'s CNMV MiCA CASP (contracting via non-regulated Moneychurros S.L.), non-EEA on a Canadian FINTRAC MSB, UK FCA EMI for the e-money leg only — with a published CAPPED fee schedule (card up to 5.5% min EUR 1, SEPA up to 3% min EUR 2, average 3.95%) but an unquantified embedded spread, a partner-set 0-2% Infrastructure Fee, and a global-ToS rate struck at the execution moment.Strength: Licence identity — 6/10Watch-out: Outside the US the confirm-button number is not contractually binding: the global ToS strikes the rate 'at the execution moment', warns the final price 'may differ from the price specified when placing an order', forbids withdrawing a submitted order, embeds an unquantified spread in the displayed price, and lets each partner surface add a 0-2% Infrastructure Fee — so the same EUR 200 purchase costs materially different amounts depending on which widget integration you met.
UNUnlimit Crypto
Choose Unlimit Crypto if named licence matters most
Named licence: 7/10 against 6/10 for Mercuryo (weight 22)
Unlimit CryptoScore 45Cyprus CySEC-authorised CASP onramp/offramp widget (Unlimit Crypto Ltd, 018/24, ΗΕ437355) whose ToS counterparty exactly matches the register — and whose price is unknowable in advance: no fee schedule exists anywhere, quotes live behind an authenticated API with no lock window, and the terms declare all orders final and non-refundable.Strength: Licence identity — 7/10Watch-out: You cannot know the price before you start and you have no refund right after you pay: no fee schedule exists anywhere on Unlimit's surfaces, the terms let the settled amount 'be different from the amounts presented to User', all orders are 'final and cannot be refunded/returned', Unlimit may cancel 'without advance notice... and without providing reason' — and your entire written recourse is a contact form and a complaint answered within 14 days under Cyprus law.
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Purchase cost
by 4 of 10weight 8.2 of 86Mercuryo leads
Mercuryo5/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto1/10 out of 10
Quote honesty
by 2 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Mercuryo leads
Mercuryo4/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto2/10 out of 10
Named licence
by 1 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Unlimit Crypto leads
Mercuryo6/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto7/10 out of 10
KYC and speed
by 2 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Mercuryo leads
Mercuryo5/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto3/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Mercuryo12/20Unlimit Crypto12/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Mercuryo11.9/30Unlimit Crypto7.1/30
Mercuryo leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Mercuryo2.7/10Unlimit Crypto2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Mercuryo3.2/8Unlimit Crypto3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Mercuryo8.3/18Unlimit Crypto8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Mercuryo unless the term Unlimit Crypto leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Unlimit Crypto if named licence matters most — it scores 7/10 to Mercuryo's 6/10 there (weight 22).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
Scored by Whose money-transmission licence is my money riding — and is that entity my counterparty? · 22% (Mercuryo 6/10, Unlimit Crypto 7/10)
Execution failure: you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
Scored by Is the number on the widget the number that settles? · 26% (Mercuryo 4/10, Unlimit Crypto 2/10)
Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
Scored by How much identity do I surrender before the coins land in my wallet, and how long does that take? · 18% (Mercuryo 5/10, Unlimit Crypto 3/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What does a €200 purchase actually cost me — by card and by bank, all-in? (34%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Mercuryo scores 12 points above Unlimit Crypto, led by purchase cost, quote honesty, and KYC and speed. Published scores, out of 100: Mercuryo 57 (rank 7 of 16 onramps), Unlimit Crypto 45 (rank 11 of 16).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research