Ledger scores 6 points above Satochip, led by secure element. Ledger ranks #12 and Satochip #16 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Ledger63
vs
Satochip57
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #12 and #16 of 23
Ledger scores 6 points above Satochip, led by secure element.
Ledger #12 of 2363
Satochip #16 of 2357
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termLedger leads on 1 of 6 published criteria; Satochip on 3. The terms sum to the gap.
TermLedgerSatochipWeightPoints
Secure element10/103/106.5+11.8for Ledger+6.0 of 32
Rebuildable firmware4/105/106.5−1.7for Satochip−0.9 of 32
Maker independence6/1010/102.6−2.7for Satochip−1.4 of 32
Fund-loss record8/1010/102.6−1.4for Satochip−0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+6.0
Reproduced gap+6.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
LedgerScore 63Certified chip you can look up, closed operating system — $69, USB-C onlyStrength: Secure element you can look up — 10/10Watch-out: Installing or updating a signing app needs Ledger's live HSM servers (developer sideloading of an app you compile yourself aside), so a new or reset Nano S Plus cannot be readied to sign the normal way without the makerSatochipScore 57An open applet on a €25 NFC card that independent wallets sign with directly — no screenStrength: Sign and recover without the maker — 10/10Watch-out: No screen: you approve what the phone or computer shows, so a compromised host can mislead you
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactLedgerSatochip
One-time priceSnapshotLedger Nano S Plus: the Offer on https://shop.ledger.com/products/ledger-nano-s-plus reads "price":"69","priceCurrency":"USD", read 1 October 2026. The same page shows a visitor in Germany "€59" (read 28 October 2026).Satochip at €25.00 including VAT on https://satochip.io/product/satochip/, read 1 October 2026; the store prices in euros only and publishes no US dollar list price.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL6+ certified; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Ledger
63#12 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Ledger if secure element matters most — it scores 10/10 to Satochip's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Secure element you can look up — 10/10
Tradeoff
Installing or updating a signing app needs Ledger's live HSM servers (developer sideloading of an app you compile yourself aside), so a new or reset Nano S Plus cannot be readied to sign the normal way without the maker
Satochip
57#16 of 23
Pick it when
Pick Satochip if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 5/10 to Ledger's 4/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Sign and recover without the maker — 10/10
Tradeoff
No screen: you approve what the phone or computer shows, so a compromised host can mislead you
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
LedgerLeads
Choose Ledger if secure element matters most
Secure element: 10/10 against 3/10 for Satochip (weight 27)
LedgerScore 63Certified chip you can look up, closed operating system — $69, USB-C onlyStrength: Secure element you can look up — 10/10Watch-out: Installing or updating a signing app needs Ledger's live HSM servers (developer sideloading of an app you compile yourself aside), so a new or reset Nano S Plus cannot be readied to sign the normal way without the maker
Satochip
Choose Satochip if rebuildable firmware matters most
Rebuildable firmware: 5/10 against 4/10 for Ledger (weight 27)
Maker independence: 10/10 against 6/10 for Ledger (weight 11)
Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 8/10 for Ledger (weight 11)
SatochipScore 57An open applet on a €25 NFC card that independent wallets sign with directly — no screenStrength: Sign and recover without the maker — 10/10Watch-out: No screen: you approve what the phone or computer shows, so a compromised host can mislead you
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
by 7 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Ledger leads
Ledger10/10 out of 10
Satochip3/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 1 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Satochip leads
Ledger4/10 out of 10
Satochip5/10 out of 10
Genuine check
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Ledger7/10 out of 10
Satochip7/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Ledger0/10 out of 10
Satochip0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 4 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Satochip leads
Ledger6/10 out of 10
Satochip10/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Satochip leads
Ledger8/10 out of 10
Satochip10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Ledger14/20Satochip14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Ledger14.8/30Satochip12.5/30
Ledger leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Ledger2.7/10Satochip2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Ledger3.2/8Satochip3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Ledger5.5/18Satochip5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Ledger unless the term Satochip leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Satochip if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 5/10 to Ledger's 4/10 there (weight 27).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Ledger 10/10, Satochip 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Ledger 4/10, Satochip 5/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Ledger 7/10, Satochip 7/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Ledger 0/10, Satochip 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Ledger 6/10, Satochip 10/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Ledger 8/10, Satochip 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Ledger scores 6 points above Satochip, led by secure element. Published scores, out of 100: Ledger 63 (rank 12 of 23 hardware wallets), Satochip 57 (rank 16 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
