KeepKey scores 16 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware, checkable keys, and genuine check. KeepKey ranks #14 and SecuX #20 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
KeepKey62
vs
SESecuX46
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #14 and #20 of 23
KeepKey scores 16 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware, checkable keys, and genuine check.
KeepKey #14 of 2362
SESecuX #20 of 2346
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termKeepKey leads on 4 of 6 published criteria; SecuX on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermKeepKeySecuXWeightPoints
Rebuildable firmware10/103/106.5+11.8for KeepKey+6.0 of 32
Secure element0/103/106.5−5.1for SecuX−2.6 of 32
Checkable keys4/100/102.9+3.0for KeepKey+1.5 of 32
Genuine check5/102/102.9+2.2for KeepKey+1.2 of 32
Maker independence10/104/102.6+4.1for KeepKey+2.1 of 32
Net of the terms+16.1
Reproduced gap+16.1
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6246+16.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
KeepKeyScore 62No secure element by design — open firmware rebuilt and matched, and no fund loss since 2015Strength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: No secure element: in 2019 Kraken extracted a KeepKey seed in about 15 minutes with the device in hand, through a chip flaw no firmware update can fix; a strong passphrase is the defenceSecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactKeepKeySecuX
One-time priceSnapshotKeepKey at $59.95 ("Buy Now — $59.95") on https://keepkey.com/product, read 1 October 2026.SecuX W10 at $49.00 on the US store https://secuxtech.com/products/secux-w10-series?country=US, read 1 October 2026.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotNo secure element; fully open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
KeepKey
62#14 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick KeepKey if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 10/10 to SecuX's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
No secure element: in 2019 Kraken extracted a KeepKey seed in about 15 minutes with the device in hand, through a chip flaw no firmware update can fix; a strong passphrase is the defence
SE
SecuX
46#20 of 23
Pick it when
Pick SecuX if secure element matters most — it scores 3/10 to KeepKey's 0/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
KeepKeyLeads
Choose KeepKey if rebuildable firmware matters most
Rebuildable firmware: 10/10 against 3/10 for SecuX (weight 27)
Genuine check: 5/10 against 2/10 for SecuX (weight 12)
Checkable keys: 4/10 against 0/10 for SecuX (weight 12)
KeepKeyScore 62No secure element by design — open firmware rebuilt and matched, and no fund loss since 2015Strength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: No secure element: in 2019 Kraken extracted a KeepKey seed in about 15 minutes with the device in hand, through a chip flaw no firmware update can fix; a strong passphrase is the defence
SESecuX
Choose SecuX if secure element matters most
Secure element: 3/10 against 0/10 for KeepKey (weight 27)
SecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
by 3 of 10weight 6.5 of 86SecuX leads
KeepKey0/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 7 of 10weight 6.5 of 86KeepKey leads
KeepKey10/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Genuine check
by 3 of 10weight 2.9 of 86KeepKey leads
KeepKey5/10 out of 10
SecuX2/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
by 4 of 10weight 2.9 of 86KeepKey leads
KeepKey4/10 out of 10
SecuX0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 6 of 10weight 2.6 of 86KeepKey leads
KeepKey10/10 out of 10
SecuX4/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
weight 2.6 of 86Tie
KeepKey10/10 out of 10
SecuX10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
KeepKey14/20SecuX14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
KeepKey14.4/30SecuX8.2/30
KeepKey leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
KeepKey2.7/10SecuX2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
KeepKey3.2/8SecuX3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
KeepKey5.5/18SecuX5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose KeepKey unless the term SecuX leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick SecuX if secure element matters most — it scores 3/10 to KeepKey's 0/10 there (weight 27).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (KeepKey 0/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (KeepKey 10/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (KeepKey 5/10, SecuX 2/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (KeepKey 4/10, SecuX 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (KeepKey 10/10, SecuX 4/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (KeepKey 10/10, SecuX 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
KeepKey scores 16 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware, checkable keys, and genuine check. Published scores, out of 100: KeepKey 62 (rank 14 of 23 hardware wallets), SecuX 46 (rank 20 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
