HaasOnline vs Freqtrade Freqtrade leads by 28 points.
Freqtrade scores 28 points above HaasOnline, led by custody, true cost, and capability. HaasOnline ranks #7 and Freqtrade #1 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
HaasOnline56
vs
Freqtrade84
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #7 and #1 of 9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.2
Reproduced gap+27.8
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8456+28.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
FreqtradeScore 84Open-source Python bot that ships tooling to invalidate its own backtestsStrength: Python-literate self-hostersWatch-out: No company behind it — no support desk, no SLA, nobody to reimburse a strategy bugHaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Quick facts
At a glance
FactHaasOnlineFreqtrade
PricingSnapshotMonthly by card: Starter $19.99, Standard $49.99, Pro $99.99, TradeServer (self-hosted or managed) $249.99; Enterprise on request. Annual by card is 16% off ($16.79 / $41.99 / $83.99 / $209.99 a month; $201.50 / $503.90 / $1,007.90 / $2,519.90 a year). Paying the year once in crypto is 40% off ($11.99 / $29.99 / $59.99 / $149.99 a month; $143.93 / $359.93 / $719.93 / $1,799.93), settled in Bitcoin via BTCPay. Yearly crypto plans are not refundable, and monthly card plans refund no unused time. A 7-day trial with every Standard feature needs no card. Only TradeServer keeps keys on your own infrastructure; Starter to Pro run in HaasOnline’s cloud. Re-read 2026-09-14: the page defaults to annual crypto billing, and the $11.99–$149.99 figures previously recorded as monthly prices are the crypto-annual rates.Free and open source under GPL-3.0: no subscription, commission or licence key, and the FAQ states Freqtrade has no crypto token. Real total cost: a machine running 24/7 (the docs recommend a Linux cloud instance with at least 2GB RAM, 1GB disk and 2 vCPU), exchange trading fees, and the Python competence to build and maintain a strategy. Re-read 14 September 2026.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; HaasScript supports arbitrary strategy logicSpot and futures algorithmic trading via your own exchange accounts
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalglobal
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
HaasOnline
56#7 of 9
Pick it when
HaasOnline leads on no published criterion; its edge is friction (2.7 vs 0.7 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
Strength
Technical users building custom strategies
Tradeoff
Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Freqtrade
84#1 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Freqtrade if custody matters most — it scores 10/10 to HaasOnline's 7/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Python-literate self-hosters
Tradeoff
No company behind it — no support desk, no SLA, nobody to reimburse a strategy bug
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
HaasOnline
HaasOnline leads Freqtrade on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
HaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
FreqtradeLeads
Choose Freqtrade if custody matters most
Custody: 10/10 against 7/10 for HaasOnline (weight 30)
True cost: 10/10 against 6/10 for HaasOnline (weight 26)
Capability: 10/10 against 9/10 for HaasOnline (weight 24)
FreqtradeScore 84Open-source Python bot that ships tooling to invalidate its own backtestsStrength: Python-literate self-hostersWatch-out: No company behind it — no support desk, no SLA, nobody to reimburse a strategy bug
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
by 3 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Freqtrade leads
HaasOnline7/10 out of 10
Freqtrade10/10 out of 10
True cost
by 4 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Freqtrade leads
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Freqtrade10/10 out of 10
Capability
by 1 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Freqtrade leads
HaasOnline9/10 out of 10
Freqtrade10/10 out of 10
Reliability
weight 4.8 of 86Tie
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Freqtrade6/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
HaasOnline14/20Freqtrade20/20
Freqtrade leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
HaasOnline16.8/30Freqtrade22.1/30
Freqtrade leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
HaasOnline2.7/10Freqtrade0.7/10
HaasOnline leads
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
HaasOnline3.2/8Freqtrade3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
HaasOnline6.9/18Freqtrade8.3/18
Freqtrade leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Freqtrade unless the term HaasOnline leads on is the one you are buying.
HaasOnline leads on no published criterion; its edge is friction (2.7 vs 0.7 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (HaasOnline 6/10, Freqtrade 6/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Freqtrade scores 28 points above HaasOnline, led by custody, true cost, and capability. Published scores, out of 100: HaasOnline 56 (rank 7 of 9 trading bots), Freqtrade 84 (rank 1 of 9).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
