GridPlus Lattice1 vs SecuX GridPlus Lattice1 leads by 6 points.
GridPlus Lattice1 scores 6 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware, genuine check, and maker independence. GridPlus Lattice1 ranks #17 and SecuX #20 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
GRGridPlus Lattice152
vs
SESecuX46
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #17 and #20 of 23
GridPlus Lattice1 scores 6 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware, genuine check, and maker independence.
GRGridPlus Lattice1 #17 of 2352
SESecuX #20 of 2346
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termGridPlus Lattice1 leads on 3 of 6 published criteria; SecuX on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermGridPlus Lattice1SecuXWeightPoints
Rebuildable firmware4/103/106.5+1.7for GridPlus Lattice1+0.9 of 32
Genuine check7/102/102.9+3.7for GridPlus Lattice1+1.9 of 32
Maker independence6/104/102.6+1.4for GridPlus Lattice1+0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+6.8
Reproduced gap+6.8
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below5246+6.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
GridPlus Lattice1Score 52A desktop signer with a large touchscreen — six years without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)SecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Quick facts
At a glance
4 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactGridPlus Lattice1SecuX
One-time priceSnapshotGridPlus Lattice1 with one SafeCard at $397.00 on https://gridplus.io/products/grid-lattice1, read 1 October 2026.SecuX W10 at $49.00 on the US store https://secuxtech.com/products/secux-w10-series?country=US, read 1 October 2026.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
GR
GridPlus Lattice1
52#17 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick GridPlus Lattice1 if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 4/10 to SecuX's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)
SE
SecuX
46#20 of 23
Pick it when
SecuX leads GridPlus Lattice1 on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
GRGridPlus Lattice1Leads
Choose GridPlus Lattice1 if rebuildable firmware matters most
Rebuildable firmware: 4/10 against 3/10 for SecuX (weight 27)
Genuine check: 7/10 against 2/10 for SecuX (weight 12)
Maker independence: 6/10 against 4/10 for SecuX (weight 11)
GridPlus Lattice1Score 52A desktop signer with a large touchscreen — six years without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)
SESecuX
SecuX leads GridPlus Lattice1 on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
SecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice13/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 1 of 10weight 6.5 of 86GridPlus Lattice1 leads
GridPlus Lattice14/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Genuine check
by 5 of 10weight 2.9 of 86GridPlus Lattice1 leads
GridPlus Lattice17/10 out of 10
SecuX2/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice10/10 out of 10
SecuX0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86GridPlus Lattice1 leads
GridPlus Lattice16/10 out of 10
SecuX4/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
weight 2.6 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice110/10 out of 10
SecuX10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice114/20SecuX14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
GridPlus Lattice110.8/30SecuX8.2/30
GridPlus Lattice1 leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice12.7/10SecuX2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice13.2/8SecuX3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice15.5/18SecuX5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose GridPlus Lattice1 unless the term SecuX leads on is the one you are buying.
SecuX leads GridPlus Lattice1 on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 3/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 4/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 7/10, SecuX 2/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 0/10, SecuX 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 6/10, SecuX 4/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 10/10, SecuX 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
GridPlus Lattice1 scores 6 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware, genuine check, and maker independence. Published scores, out of 100: GridPlus Lattice1 52 (rank 17 of 23 hardware wallets), SecuX 46 (rank 20 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research