GridPlus Lattice1 vs CoolWallet Pro GridPlus Lattice1 leads by 4 points.
GridPlus Lattice1 scores 4 points above CoolWallet Pro, led by genuine check and fund-loss record. GridPlus Lattice1 ranks #17 and CoolWallet Pro #18 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
GRGridPlus Lattice152
vs
CPCoolWallet Pro48
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #17 and #18 of 23
GridPlus Lattice1 scores 4 points above CoolWallet Pro, led by genuine check and fund-loss record.
GRGridPlus Lattice1 #17 of 2352
CPCoolWallet Pro #18 of 2348
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termGridPlus Lattice1 leads on 2 of 6 published criteria; CoolWallet Pro on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermGridPlus Lattice1CoolWallet ProWeightPoints
Genuine check7/102/102.9+3.7for GridPlus Lattice1+1.9 of 32
Fund-loss record10/109/102.6+0.7for GridPlus Lattice1+0.4 of 32
Net of the terms+4.4
Reproduced gap+4.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below5248+4.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
GridPlus Lattice1Score 52A desktop signer with a large touchscreen — six years without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)CoolWallet ProScore 48Credit-card signer with an e-paper screen and Bluetooth at $149 — five years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 9/10Watch-out: Its EAL6+ secure element is claimed with no part number, so no certificate can be looked up
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactGridPlus Lattice1CoolWallet Pro
One-time priceSnapshotGridPlus Lattice1 with one SafeCard at $397.00 on https://gridplus.io/products/grid-lattice1, read 1 October 2026.CoolWallet Pro at $149.00 on https://www.coolwallet.io/products/coolwallet-pro, read 2 October 2026; every co-branded Pro edition for sale in the store feed is also $149.00.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalglobal
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
GR
GridPlus Lattice1
52#17 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick GridPlus Lattice1 if genuine check matters most — it scores 7/10 to CoolWallet Pro's 2/10 there (weight 12).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)
CP
CoolWallet Pro
48#18 of 23
Pick it when
CoolWallet Pro leads GridPlus Lattice1 on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 9/10
Tradeoff
Its EAL6+ secure element is claimed with no part number, so no certificate can be looked up
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
GRGridPlus Lattice1Leads
Choose GridPlus Lattice1 if genuine check matters most
Genuine check: 7/10 against 2/10 for CoolWallet Pro (weight 12)
Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 9/10 for CoolWallet Pro (weight 11)
GridPlus Lattice1Score 52A desktop signer with a large touchscreen — six years without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)
CPCoolWallet Pro
CoolWallet Pro leads GridPlus Lattice1 on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
CoolWallet ProScore 48Credit-card signer with an e-paper screen and Bluetooth at $149 — five years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 9/10Watch-out: Its EAL6+ secure element is claimed with no part number, so no certificate can be looked up
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice13/10 out of 10
CoolWallet Pro3/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice14/10 out of 10
CoolWallet Pro4/10 out of 10
Genuine check
by 5 of 10weight 2.9 of 86GridPlus Lattice1 leads
GridPlus Lattice17/10 out of 10
CoolWallet Pro2/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice10/10 out of 10
CoolWallet Pro0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
weight 2.6 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice16/10 out of 10
CoolWallet Pro6/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 1 of 10weight 2.6 of 86GridPlus Lattice1 leads
GridPlus Lattice110/10 out of 10
CoolWallet Pro9/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice114/20CoolWallet Pro14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
GridPlus Lattice110.8/30CoolWallet Pro9.1/30
GridPlus Lattice1 leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice12.7/10CoolWallet Pro2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice13.2/8CoolWallet Pro3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice15.5/18CoolWallet Pro5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose GridPlus Lattice1 unless the term CoolWallet Pro leads on is the one you are buying.
CoolWallet Pro leads GridPlus Lattice1 on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 3/10, CoolWallet Pro 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 4/10, CoolWallet Pro 4/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 7/10, CoolWallet Pro 2/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 0/10, CoolWallet Pro 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 6/10, CoolWallet Pro 6/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 10/10, CoolWallet Pro 9/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
GridPlus Lattice1 scores 4 points above CoolWallet Pro, led by genuine check and fund-loss record. Published scores, out of 100: GridPlus Lattice1 52 (rank 17 of 23 hardware wallets), CoolWallet Pro 48 (rank 18 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research