Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Hardware Wallets

GridPlus Lattice1 vs Blockstream Jade Core Blockstream Jade Core leads by 19 points.

Blockstream Jade Core scores 19 points above GridPlus Lattice1, led by rebuildable firmware, secure element, and checkable keys. GridPlus Lattice1 ranks #17 and Blockstream Jade Core #4 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

GridPlus Lattice152
Blockstream Jade Core71
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #17 and #4 of 23
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 6 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-GRIDPLUS-LATTICE1-VS-BLOCKSTREAM-JADE-CORE-901fd1d3
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Blockstream Jade Core leads by 19 points

Blockstream Jade Core scores 19 points above GridPlus Lattice1, led by rebuildable firmware, secure element, and checkable keys.

GridPlus Lattice1 #17 of 2352
Blockstream Jade Core #4 of 2371
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termBlockstream Jade Core leads on 4 of 6 published criteria; GridPlus Lattice1 on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermBlockstream Jade CoreGridPlus Lattice1WeightPoints
Rebuildable firmware10/104/106.5+10.1for Blockstream Jade Core+5.2 of 32
Secure element4/103/106.5+1.7for Blockstream Jade Core+0.9 of 32
Checkable keys10/100/102.9+7.5for Blockstream Jade Core+3.8 of 32
Fund-loss record5/1010/102.6−3.4for GridPlus Lattice1−1.8 of 32
Maker independence10/106/102.6+2.7for Blockstream Jade Core+1.4 of 32
Net of the terms+18.6
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+18.5
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7152+19.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactGridPlus Lattice1Blockstream Jade Core
One-time priceSnapshotGridPlus Lattice1 with one SafeCard at $397.00 on https://gridplus.io/products/grid-lattice1, read 1 October 2026.Blockstream Jade Core: the US store's product data reads "price":"99.00" with no compare-at price (US dollars), read 2 October 2026 from https://store.blockstream.com/products/blockstream-jade-core.json?country=US.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.No secure element; fully open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

GridPlus Lattice1

52#17 of 23
Pick it when
Pick GridPlus Lattice1 if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to Blockstream Jade Core's 5/10 there (weight 11).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)

Blockstream Jade Core

71#4 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Blockstream Jade Core if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 10/10 to GridPlus Lattice1's 4/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
No secure element: someone holding the device faces the PIN oracle and your passphrase, not a certified chip
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

GridPlus Lattice1

Choose GridPlus Lattice1 if fund-loss record matters most

  • Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 5/10 for Blockstream Jade Core (weight 11)
Blockstream Jade CoreLeads

Choose Blockstream Jade Core if secure element matters most

  • Secure element: 4/10 against 3/10 for GridPlus Lattice1 (weight 27)
  • Rebuildable firmware: 10/10 against 4/10 for GridPlus Lattice1 (weight 27)
  • Checkable keys: 10/10 against 0/10 for GridPlus Lattice1 (weight 12)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Secure element

by 1 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Blockstream Jade Core leads
GridPlus Lattice13 out of 10
Blockstream Jade Core4 out of 10

Rebuildable firmware

by 6 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Blockstream Jade Core leads
GridPlus Lattice14 out of 10
Blockstream Jade Core10 out of 10

Genuine check

weight 2.9 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice17 out of 10
Blockstream Jade Core7 out of 10

Checkable keys

by 10 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Blockstream Jade Core leads
GridPlus Lattice10 out of 10
Blockstream Jade Core10 out of 10

Maker independence

by 4 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Blockstream Jade Core leads
GridPlus Lattice16 out of 10
Blockstream Jade Core10 out of 10

Fund-loss record

by 5 of 10weight 2.6 of 86GridPlus Lattice1 leads
GridPlus Lattice110 out of 10
Blockstream Jade Core5 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice114/20Blockstream Jade Core14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
GridPlus Lattice110.8/30Blockstream Jade Core17.9/30
Blockstream Jade Core leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice12.7/10Blockstream Jade Core2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice13.2/8Blockstream Jade Core3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice15.5/18Blockstream Jade Core5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Blockstream Jade Core unless the term GridPlus Lattice1 leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick GridPlus Lattice1 if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to Blockstream Jade Core's 5/10 there (weight 11).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 3/10, Blockstream Jade Core 4/10)
    Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 4/10, Blockstream Jade Core 10/10)
    Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 7/10, Blockstream Jade Core 7/10)
    Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 0/10, Blockstream Jade Core 10/10)
    Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 6/10, Blockstream Jade Core 10/10)
    Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 10/10, Blockstream Jade Core 5/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Blockstream Jade Core scores 19 points above GridPlus Lattice1, led by rebuildable firmware, secure element, and checkable keys. Published scores, out of 100: GridPlus Lattice1 52 (rank 17 of 23 hardware wallets), Blockstream Jade Core 71 (rank 4 of 23).

Related pages

Go deeper

Trust & process
Individual reviews
Other comparisons
Written and reviewed by Founder
Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research