GridPlus Lattice1 vs BitBox02 Nova BitBox02 Nova leads by 29 points.
BitBox02 Nova scores 29 points above GridPlus Lattice1, led by secure element, rebuildable firmware, and checkable keys. GridPlus Lattice1 ranks #17 and BitBox02 Nova #1 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
GRGridPlus Lattice152
vs
BitBox02 Nova81
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #17 and #1 of 23
BitBox02 Nova scores 29 points above GridPlus Lattice1, led by secure element, rebuildable firmware, and checkable keys.
GRGridPlus Lattice1 #17 of 2352
BitBox02 Nova #1 of 2381
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termBitBox02 Nova leads on 4 of 6 published criteria; GridPlus Lattice1 on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermBitBox02 NovaGridPlus Lattice1WeightPoints
Secure element10/103/106.5+11.8for BitBox02 Nova+6.0 of 32
Rebuildable firmware10/104/106.5+10.1for BitBox02 Nova+5.2 of 32
Checkable keys10/100/102.9+7.5for BitBox02 Nova+3.8 of 32
Fund-loss record5/1010/102.6−3.4for GridPlus Lattice1−1.8 of 32
Maker independence10/106/102.6+2.7for BitBox02 Nova+1.4 of 32
Net of the terms+28.7
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+28.6
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8152+29.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
BitBox02 NovaScore 81EAL6+ secure chip and firmware rebuilt and matched, with Bluetooth — new in 2025, €175Strength: Secure element you can look up — 10/10Watch-out: First shipped in 2025, so it has a short record in buyers' handsGridPlus Lattice1Score 52A desktop signer with a large touchscreen — six years without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactGridPlus Lattice1BitBox02 Nova
One-time priceSnapshotGridPlus Lattice1 with one SafeCard at $397.00 on https://gridplus.io/products/grid-lattice1, read 1 October 2026.BitBox02 Nova, Multi edition, at €175.00 including 19% VAT on https://shop.bitbox.swiss/en/products/bitbox02-nova-79/, read 1 October 2026; no US dollar list price is published.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, EAL6+ certified; fully open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
GR
GridPlus Lattice1
52#17 of 23
Pick it when
Pick GridPlus Lattice1 if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to BitBox02 Nova's 5/10 there (weight 11).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)
BitBox02 Nova
81#1 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick BitBox02 Nova if secure element matters most — it scores 10/10 to GridPlus Lattice1's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Secure element you can look up — 10/10
Tradeoff
First shipped in 2025, so it has a short record in buyers' hands
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
GRGridPlus Lattice1
Choose GridPlus Lattice1 if fund-loss record matters most
Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 5/10 for BitBox02 Nova (weight 11)
GridPlus Lattice1Score 52A desktop signer with a large touchscreen — six years without a device-level fund lossStrength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Pairing with MetaMask, Rabby or Ambire runs through GridPlus's hosted page (lattice.gridplus.io)
BitBox02 NovaLeads
Choose BitBox02 Nova if secure element matters most
Secure element: 10/10 against 3/10 for GridPlus Lattice1 (weight 27)
Rebuildable firmware: 10/10 against 4/10 for GridPlus Lattice1 (weight 27)
Checkable keys: 10/10 against 0/10 for GridPlus Lattice1 (weight 12)
BitBox02 NovaScore 81EAL6+ secure chip and firmware rebuilt and matched, with Bluetooth — new in 2025, €175Strength: Secure element you can look up — 10/10Watch-out: First shipped in 2025, so it has a short record in buyers' hands
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
by 7 of 10weight 6.5 of 86BitBox02 Nova leads
GridPlus Lattice13/10 out of 10
BitBox02 Nova10/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 6 of 10weight 6.5 of 86BitBox02 Nova leads
GridPlus Lattice14/10 out of 10
BitBox02 Nova10/10 out of 10
Genuine check
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
GridPlus Lattice17/10 out of 10
BitBox02 Nova7/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
by 10 of 10weight 2.9 of 86BitBox02 Nova leads
GridPlus Lattice10/10 out of 10
BitBox02 Nova10/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 4 of 10weight 2.6 of 86BitBox02 Nova leads
GridPlus Lattice16/10 out of 10
BitBox02 Nova10/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 5 of 10weight 2.6 of 86GridPlus Lattice1 leads
GridPlus Lattice110/10 out of 10
BitBox02 Nova5/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice114/20BitBox02 Nova14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
GridPlus Lattice110.8/30BitBox02 Nova21.8/30
BitBox02 Nova leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice12.7/10BitBox02 Nova2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice13.2/8BitBox02 Nova3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
GridPlus Lattice15.5/18BitBox02 Nova5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose BitBox02 Nova unless the term GridPlus Lattice1 leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick GridPlus Lattice1 if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to BitBox02 Nova's 5/10 there (weight 11).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 3/10, BitBox02 Nova 10/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (GridPlus Lattice1 4/10, BitBox02 Nova 10/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 7/10, BitBox02 Nova 7/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (GridPlus Lattice1 0/10, BitBox02 Nova 10/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 6/10, BitBox02 Nova 10/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (GridPlus Lattice1 10/10, BitBox02 Nova 5/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
BitBox02 Nova scores 29 points above GridPlus Lattice1, led by secure element, rebuildable firmware, and checkable keys. Published scores, out of 100: GridPlus Lattice1 52 (rank 17 of 23 hardware wallets), BitBox02 Nova 81 (rank 1 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
