Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Tax Software

Divly vs CoinTracker Divly leads by 2 points.

Divly scores 2 points above CoinTracker, led by your tax form and record portability. Divly ranks #4 and CoinTracker #6 of 11 published tax software. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Divly78
CoinTracker76
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #4 and #6 of 11
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-DIVLY-VS-COINTRACKER-5ceda443
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Divly leads by 2 points

Divly scores 2 points above CoinTracker, led by your tax form and record portability.

Divly #4 of 1178
CoinTracker #6 of 1176
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termDivly leads on 2 of 4 published criteria; CoinTracker on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermDivlyCoinTrackerWeightPoints
Your tax form9/108/107.7+2.0for Divly+1.0 of 32
Cost-basis method7/108/106.2−1.6for CoinTracker−0.8 of 32
Complex transactions7/108/105.3−1.4for CoinTracker−0.7 of 32
Record portability6/104/104.8+2.5for Divly+1.3 of 32
Net of the terms+1.5
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+1.6
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7876+2.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

2 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactDivlyCoinTracker
PricingSnapshothttps://divly.com/en/pricing — fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, plain curl. Header "Fair and flexible pricing options" — "No subscription or lock-in, only pay for the years you need to declare. Try Divly for free before you commit." The page shows one price column at a time behind a transaction selector ("Up to 100", "Up to 1,000", "Up to 10,000", "Up to 100,000"); the default (Up to 100) cards render Free "No credit card required. Start for free.", Essential "39 EUR", Peace of Mind "99 EUR" and Full Service "599 EUR". The full ladder is in the page's inline script, quoted as served: "0: [0, 39, 99, 599]", "1: [0, 99, 199, 699]", "2: [0, 199, 399, 799]", "3: [0, 399, 699, 999]" (Free, Essential, Peace of Mind, Full Service, in euros, for up to 100 / 1,000 / 10,000 / 100,000 transactions in the tax year). FAQ: "Only transactions for the latest tax year are included in the calculation." | "No, by purchasing a Divly tax report you are not signing up to a recurring subscription. The payment is one-off." | "Businesses can only purchase the Full Service package." The help article https://help.divly.com/en/articles/8233252-how-does-pricing-work-on-divly-for-individuals ("February 3, 2026", fetched 29 September 2026) adds: "Once you purchase a tax report, you will retain lifetime access for that tax year." and "Yes, each tax year requires its own purchase. The exception is the bundle that includes 2011-2021 for the price of one tax year." Prices unchanged since 19 August 2026.https://www.cointracker.com/plans — fetched 29 September 2026; plain curl returns HTTP 403 (bot challenge), rendered in headless Chrome (HTTP 200). Cards: "Free" "$0" ("No tax filing"); "Base" "Starting at" "$59" "/year" ("2025 tax forms and all past years", "Up to 100 transactions per year"); "Prime" "Best value" "Starting at" "$199" "/year" ("Up to 1,000 transactions per year"); "Ultra" "Starting at" "$599" "/year" ("Change cost basis method by year", "Up to 10,000 transactions per year"); "Full Service" "Starting at" "$3499" "/year" ("Up to 300,000 transactions per year", "Up to 15 hours of hands-on support to manage CSVs, fix errors, and reconcile accounts for the current tax year"). Comparison table, columns Free | Base/Base+ | Prime/Prime+ | Ultra/Ultra+: "Yearly transaction limit for tax forms" "100 | 250", "1,000 | 2,500", "10,000 | 50,000"; "Lifetime transactions limit for tax forms" "200,000" on each paid tier; pricing row "$0 per year", "$59 / $99 per year", "$199 / $299 per year", "$599 / $1999 per year". Counting rules: "We only count transactions from your current tax year — not your entire history." | "File for any prior year at no extra cost — one plan covers all your past tax years." Purchase shape, from https://support.cointracker.com/hc/en-us/articles/4413049695249-CoinTracker-Personal-plan-pricing (rendered 29 September 2026): "CoinTracker subscriptions auto-renew annually on the original purchase date." and "CoinTracker offers a 100% money-back guarantee within 30 days of purchase, provided that no tax forms have been downloaded." https://www.cointracker.com/pricing is not the pricing page; /plans is. Prices unchanged since 19 August 2026.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotglobalglobal
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Divly

78#4 of 11
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Divly if your tax form matters most — it scores 9/10 to CoinTracker's 8/10 there (weight 32).
Strength
Named form output — 9/10
Tradeoff
Four one-way doors, none of them on the page you buy from, and two of them invisible without reading Divly's own shipped code. (1) THE PRICE YOU SEE IS THE 100-TRANSACTION PRICE - CONFIRMED AT THE SOURCE. https://divly.com/en/pricing advertises Essential at '39' 'EUR', but that is the first cell of a four-column ladder wired into the page's own inline script. From the served source on 2026-08-19: 'const pricingMatrix = { 0: [0, 39, 99, 599], 1: [0, 99, 199, 699], 2: [0, 199, 399, 799], 3: [0, 399, 699, 999] };'. The mapping is not inferred - the bracket buttons carry it: '<button class="transaction-btn active" data-index="0" onclick="updatePricing(0)">Up to 100</button>', then data-index 1 'Up to 1,000', 2 'Up to 10,000', 3 'Up to 100,000'; the script ends with 'updatePricing(0);' and the server-rendered spans read '<span id="price-essential">39</span>'. EUR 39 buys 'Up to 100' transactions for the year. At 'Up to 1,000' Essential is EUR 99; at 'Up to 10,000' EUR 199; at 'Up to 100,000' EUR 399 - and Full Service starts at EUR 599, not the EUR 499 this repo's catalog row records. Anyone with a routine DCA habit is in the 1,000+ bracket and pays 2.5x the headline. (2) ONCE YOU DOWNLOAD, YOU CANNOT UNBUY, AND THE TERMS AND THE HELP CENTRE DISAGREE. Terms: 'It is not possible to get a refund if you have downloaded a file from the tax report section in the platform.' - flat, unqualified. https://help.divly.com/en/articles/8233489-can-i-request-a-refund ('February 3, 2026') sets three requirements - 'You make the request within 14 days of purchasing the service.' / 'The reason for refund is related to a bug or issue that Divly is unable to resolve within a reasonable time frame.' / 'You have not downloaded any tax reports.' - and then adds a fourth: 'This does not apply if the issue is related to the tax report.' So the help centre carves out the commonest case while the binding contract does not; the Terms govern, and the disagreement is the finding. Either way, dissatisfaction that is not a Divly bug is not a refund reason. Worse, the Terms purport to cancel the EU statutory withdrawal right within the same clause that grants it, under the heading 'Your right to terminate the Agreement pre-maturely': 'If you are a consumer, you have the right to withdraw from this Agreement without giving any reason within 14 days.' ... and, four sentences later, 'Since this is a Service we will not, if you withdraw from this Agreement, refund any payments we received from you.' (3) THE PRICING PAGE IS NOT THE WHOLE PRICE LIST - three charges exist that it never shows, all read from Divly's own app bundle (plugin_v23.js, downloaded 2026-08-19). A per-hour overage on the top tier, stated in the help centre: Full Service 'includes 4 hours of work by the Divly Expert. In most cases this is enough, however if extra hours are required they will be charged at 150 EUR per hour.' A priority-service add-on with a four-figure fallback: 'get_priority_service_price:function(){return this.pricing_info&&this.pricing_info.priority_service_price?this.pricing_info.priority_service_price:1e3}'. And an early-bird tier system fetched at checkout: 'fetch_early_bird_tiers:async function(){try{const e=await(await fetch(Fe+"/client/get_early_bird_tiers")).json();'. (4) A TIER THE PRICING PAGE SELLS IS HARDCODED AS UNBUYABLE. The same bundle contains 'is_sold_out_tier_value:function(t){return typeof t!="string"?!1:t.replace("-EARLY","").toUpperCase().startsWith("SECOND_100000")}' and, in the checkout handler, 'if(t.some(e=>this.is_sold_out_tier_value(e.tier))){alert("Sold out tier cannot be purchased.");return}'. In the same file 'THIRD_' resolves to 'Full Service', so 'SECOND_' is the second paid tier, Peace of Mind - the one https://divly.com/en/pricing still advertises at EUR 699 for the 'Up to 100,000' bracket. Whether the server also refuses the sale is unestablished; what is established is that Divly's own client blocks it. (5) THE 'lifetime access ... forever' PROMISE YOU ARE RELYING ON lives in a help article, not the contract; the contract is stamped 'Updated by Synch: 22 September 2021', never mentions it, and reserves account deletion. (6) IF YOU ARE GERMAN, THE STALE PAGE IS THE MARKETING ONE, NOT THE PRODUCT. https://divly.com/en/guides/crypto-taxes-in-germany ('Jan. 15, 2026') still says 'You have a €600 exemption limit on crypto profits.' while the help article ('July 7, 2026') says 'If you exceed the €1000 exemption limit (€600 for tax years 2023 and earlier), the full amount of gains is taxable.' The app itself renders the correct figure - the German tax widget in plugin_v23.js computes the exemption as 'C(a.year>=2024?1e3:600)'. So the number you FILE is right; the number you'd PLAN with off the guide is two years stale.

CoinTracker

76#6 of 11
Pick it when
Pick CoinTracker if cost-basis method matters most — it scores 8/10 to Divly's 7/10 there (weight 26).
Strength
Named form output — 8/10
Tradeoff
UPHELD IN FULL, and better sourced than submitted. You cannot get your money back once you look at your data, and you cannot get your data back once you stop paying — both halves are in writing on served pages. The refund dies at the first download, including a plain transaction file: the Terms (https://cointracker.io/terms → https://www.cointracker.com/terms, 'Last updated: March 10, 2026') state 'Refunds are not possible once you have downloaded any of the tax forms or CSV files (including Transaction History CSV).', and the help centre states the operational consequence on https://support.cointracker.com/hc/en-us/articles/38104390028945-Available-reports-on-CoinTracker (updated 2026-08-14): 'Please note: Downloading a report counts as downloading a tax form for refund-eligibility purposes. Once you've downloaded any report, your CoinTracker plan is treated as used for the tax year.' So the 30-day 'money-back guarantee' survives only for a buyer who never opens the thing they bought. The other half: this is an auto-renewing ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION, and on lapse (https://support.cointracker.com/hc/en-us/articles/46693057775761-How-to-cancel-auto-renewal-on-your-CoinTracker-plan, updated 2026-08-14) 'Once canceled, your plan remains active until the end of your current billing period. After that date, your account moves to the free subscription. Your CoinTracker account and data will not be deleted.' — while the plans page shows the Free tier labelled 'No tax filing' with an empty cell in the 'Download tax forms (8949, Schedule D and others)' row. CoinTracker states the consequence for an ALREADY-FILED year on https://support.cointracker.com/hc/en-us/articles/31572739238417-Switching-to-Per-Wallet-tracking-after-missing-IRS-Safe-Harbor (updated 2026-08-14): 'You may need to renew your subscription plan to access your tax reports for 2024.' NEW EVIDENCE this pass, which the submitted record did not have and which hardens the caveat: the vendor's own regional-deadline table (https://support.cointracker.com/hc/en-us/articles/38071402566417-Regional-tax-extension-deadlines-observed-by-CoinTracker) spells the renewal toll out per region — the UK row reads 'Renewal is required before downloading 2025 tax forms.' and the Australia row 'Renewal is required before downloading your 2025 tax forms.'. The reports carrying the IRS safe-harbour position under Rev. Proc. 2024-28 are explicitly not retained for you: 'CoinTracker cannot save these reports for you, it is your responsibility to make sure that you keep all reports provided to you indefinitely.' And the migration is irreversible in place: 'Important: After you select Migrate now, CoinTracker locks all your data prior to 2025. You won't be able to edit pre-2025 transactions or tax reports afterward.' — preceded by the warning 'Ensure there are no Review suggested transactions remaining. Once you've made the allocation, you cannot go back to fix any issues.' Secondary, worth knowing before filing: the default lot-matching method is HIFO, not FIFO — 'Note: CoinTracker defaults all wallets to HIFO, as it tends to lower the tax bill.' — a Specific-ID subset the same page says the product cannot perform at unit level, on a page that also states Specific ID may no longer be applied retroactively for 2025-onward US returns. Changing it per year is an Ultra-tier ($599) feature: 'Changing your cost basis method will apply to all years unless you have an Ultra plan, which will allow you to set a different method for each tax year.'
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

DivlyLeads

Choose Divly if your tax form matters most

  • Your tax form: 9/10 against 8/10 for CoinTracker (weight 32)
  • Record portability: 6/10 against 4/10 for CoinTracker (weight 20)
CoinTracker

Choose CoinTracker if cost-basis method matters most

  • Cost-basis method: 8/10 against 7/10 for Divly (weight 26)
  • Complex transactions: 8/10 against 7/10 for Divly (weight 22)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Your tax form

by 1 of 10weight 7.7 of 86Divly leads
Divly9 out of 10
CoinTracker8 out of 10

Cost-basis method

by 1 of 10weight 6.2 of 86CoinTracker leads
Divly7 out of 10
CoinTracker8 out of 10

Complex transactions

by 1 of 10weight 5.3 of 86CoinTracker leads
Divly7 out of 10
CoinTracker8 out of 10

Record portability

by 2 of 10weight 4.8 of 86Divly leads
Divly6 out of 10
CoinTracker4 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Divly14/20CoinTracker14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Divly17.9/30CoinTracker17.3/30
Divly leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Divly2.7/10CoinTracker2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Divly3.2/8CoinTracker3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Divly8.3/18CoinTracker8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Divly unless the term CoinTracker leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick CoinTracker if cost-basis method matters most — it scores 8/10 to Divly's 7/10 there (weight 26).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
    Scored by Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? · 32% (Divly 9/10, CoinTracker 8/10)
  • Exit failure: you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
    Scored by Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? · 20% (Divly 6/10, CoinTracker 4/10)
  • Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
    Scored by Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? · 26% (Divly 7/10, CoinTracker 8/10)
    Scored by My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? · 22% (Divly 7/10, CoinTracker 8/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Divly scores 2 points above CoinTracker, led by your tax form and record portability. Published scores, out of 100: Divly 78 (rank 4 of 11 tax software), CoinTracker 76 (rank 6 of 11).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research