Cypherock X1 vs SecuX Cypherock X1 leads by 14 points.
Cypherock X1 scores 14 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware and genuine check. Cypherock X1 ranks #15 and SecuX #20 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Cypherock X160
vs
SESecuX46
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #15 and #20 of 23
Cypherock X1 scores 14 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware and genuine check.
Cypherock X1 #15 of 2360
SESecuX #20 of 2346
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termCypherock X1 leads on 2 of 6 published criteria; SecuX on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermCypherock X1SecuXWeightPoints
Rebuildable firmware10/103/106.5+11.8for Cypherock X1+6.0 of 32
Genuine check7/102/102.9+3.7for Cypherock X1+1.9 of 32
Fund-loss record8/1010/102.6−1.4for SecuX−0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+14.2
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+14.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Cypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updatedSecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactCypherock X1SecuX
One-time priceSnapshotCypherock X1 Basic (one vault, four cards): the maker's store feed https://api-commerce.cypherock.com/api/products reads "price":99,"compareAtPrice":129, read 1 October 2026; the same feed names "currency":"USD" (read 28 October 2026).SecuX W10 at $49.00 on the US store https://secuxtech.com/products/secux-w10-series?country=US, read 1 October 2026.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL5+ certified; firmware open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Cypherock X1
60#15 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 10/10 to SecuX's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
SE
SecuX
46#20 of 23
Pick it when
Pick SecuX if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to Cypherock X1's 8/10 there (weight 11).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Cypherock X1Leads
Choose Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most
Rebuildable firmware: 10/10 against 3/10 for SecuX (weight 27)
Genuine check: 7/10 against 2/10 for SecuX (weight 12)
Cypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
SESecuX
Choose SecuX if fund-loss record matters most
Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 8/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
SecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
Cypherock X13/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 7 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
Cypherock X110/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Genuine check
by 5 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
Cypherock X17/10 out of 10
SecuX2/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Cypherock X10/10 out of 10
SecuX0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
weight 2.6 of 86Tie
Cypherock X14/10 out of 10
SecuX4/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86SecuX leads
Cypherock X18/10 out of 10
SecuX10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X114/20SecuX14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Cypherock X113.6/30SecuX8.2/30
Cypherock X1 leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X12.7/10SecuX2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X13.2/8SecuX3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X15.5/18SecuX5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Cypherock X1 unless the term SecuX leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick SecuX if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to Cypherock X1's 8/10 there (weight 11).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Cypherock X1 3/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Cypherock X1 10/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Cypherock X1 7/10, SecuX 2/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Cypherock X1 0/10, SecuX 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Cypherock X1 4/10, SecuX 4/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Cypherock X1 8/10, SecuX 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Cypherock X1 scores 14 points above SecuX, led by rebuildable firmware and genuine check. Published scores, out of 100: Cypherock X1 60 (rank 15 of 23 hardware wallets), SecuX 46 (rank 20 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
