Cypherock X1 vs Satochip Cypherock X1 leads by 3 points.
Cypherock X1 scores 3 points above Satochip, led by rebuildable firmware. Cypherock X1 ranks #15 and Satochip #16 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Cypherock X160
vs
Satochip57
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #15 and #16 of 23
Cypherock X1 scores 3 points above Satochip, led by rebuildable firmware.
Cypherock X1 #15 of 2360
Satochip #16 of 2357
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termCypherock X1 leads on 1 of 6 published criteria; Satochip on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermCypherock X1SatochipWeightPoints
Rebuildable firmware10/105/106.5+8.4for Cypherock X1+4.3 of 32
Maker independence4/1010/102.6−4.1for Satochip−2.1 of 32
Fund-loss record8/1010/102.6−1.4for Satochip−0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+2.9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+2.9
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6057+3.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Cypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updatedSatochipScore 57An open applet on a €25 NFC card that independent wallets sign with directly — no screenStrength: Sign and recover without the maker — 10/10Watch-out: No screen: you approve what the phone or computer shows, so a compromised host can mislead you
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactCypherock X1Satochip
One-time priceSnapshotCypherock X1 Basic (one vault, four cards): the maker's store feed https://api-commerce.cypherock.com/api/products reads "price":99,"compareAtPrice":129, read 1 October 2026; the same feed names "currency":"USD" (read 28 October 2026).Satochip at €25.00 including VAT on https://satochip.io/product/satochip/, read 1 October 2026; the store prices in euros only and publishes no US dollar list price.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL5+ certified; firmware open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Cypherock X1
60#15 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 10/10 to Satochip's 5/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Satochip
57#16 of 23
Pick it when
Pick Satochip if maker independence matters most — it scores 10/10 to Cypherock X1's 4/10 there (weight 11).
Strength
Sign and recover without the maker — 10/10
Tradeoff
No screen: you approve what the phone or computer shows, so a compromised host can mislead you
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Cypherock X1Leads
Choose Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most
Rebuildable firmware: 10/10 against 5/10 for Satochip (weight 27)
Cypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Satochip
Choose Satochip if maker independence matters most
Maker independence: 10/10 against 4/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 8/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
SatochipScore 57An open applet on a €25 NFC card that independent wallets sign with directly — no screenStrength: Sign and recover without the maker — 10/10Watch-out: No screen: you approve what the phone or computer shows, so a compromised host can mislead you
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
Cypherock X13/10 out of 10
Satochip3/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 5 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
Cypherock X110/10 out of 10
Satochip5/10 out of 10
Genuine check
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Cypherock X17/10 out of 10
Satochip7/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Cypherock X10/10 out of 10
Satochip0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 6 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Satochip leads
Cypherock X14/10 out of 10
Satochip10/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Satochip leads
Cypherock X18/10 out of 10
Satochip10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X114/20Satochip14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Cypherock X113.6/30Satochip12.5/30
Cypherock X1 leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X12.7/10Satochip2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X13.2/8Satochip3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X15.5/18Satochip5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Cypherock X1 unless the term Satochip leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Satochip if maker independence matters most — it scores 10/10 to Cypherock X1's 4/10 there (weight 11).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Cypherock X1 3/10, Satochip 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Cypherock X1 10/10, Satochip 5/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Cypherock X1 7/10, Satochip 7/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Cypherock X1 0/10, Satochip 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Cypherock X1 4/10, Satochip 10/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Cypherock X1 8/10, Satochip 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Cypherock X1 scores 3 points above Satochip, led by rebuildable firmware. Published scores, out of 100: Cypherock X1 60 (rank 15 of 23 hardware wallets), Satochip 57 (rank 16 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
