Cypherock X1 vs Ledger Nano X Ledger Nano X leads by 3 points.
Ledger Nano X scores 3 points above Cypherock X1, led by secure element, maker independence, and fund-loss record. Cypherock X1 ranks #15 and Ledger Nano X #13 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Cypherock X160
vs
Ledger Nano X63
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #15 and #13 of 23
Ledger Nano X scores 3 points above Cypherock X1, led by secure element, maker independence, and fund-loss record.
Cypherock X1 #15 of 2360
Ledger Nano X #13 of 2363
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termLedger Nano X leads on 3 of 6 published criteria; Cypherock X1 on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermLedger Nano XCypherock X1WeightPoints
Secure element9/103/106.5+10.1for Ledger Nano X+5.2 of 32
Rebuildable firmware4/1010/106.5−10.1for Cypherock X1−5.2 of 32
Maker independence6/104/102.6+1.4for Ledger Nano X+0.7 of 32
Fund-loss record10/108/102.6+1.4for Ledger Nano X+0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+2.7
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+2.9
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6360+3.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Ledger Nano XScore 63Seven years without a device-level fund loss, an EAL5+ chip you can look up — Bluetooth and USB-C, $99Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Its ST33J2M0 secure element is certified at EAL5+, one level below the Nano S Plus's EAL6+ chip, so it scores 9 rather than 10Cypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactCypherock X1Ledger Nano X
One-time priceSnapshotCypherock X1 Basic (one vault, four cards): the maker's store feed https://api-commerce.cypherock.com/api/products reads "price":99,"compareAtPrice":129, read 1 October 2026; the same feed names "currency":"USD" (read 28 October 2026).Ledger Nano X: the Offer on https://shop.ledger.com/products/ledger-nano-x reads "price":"99","priceCurrency":"USD", read 2 October 2026. The same page shows a visitor in Germany "€99" (read 28 October 2026).
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL5+ certified; firmware open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, EAL5+ certified; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Cypherock X1
60#15 of 23
Pick it when
Pick Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 10/10 to Ledger Nano X's 4/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Ledger Nano X
63#13 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Ledger Nano X if secure element matters most — it scores 9/10 to Cypherock X1's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Its ST33J2M0 secure element is certified at EAL5+, one level below the Nano S Plus's EAL6+ chip, so it scores 9 rather than 10
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Cypherock X1
Choose Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most
Rebuildable firmware: 10/10 against 4/10 for Ledger Nano X (weight 27)
Cypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Ledger Nano XLeads
Choose Ledger Nano X if secure element matters most
Secure element: 9/10 against 3/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 27)
Maker independence: 6/10 against 4/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 8/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
Ledger Nano XScore 63Seven years without a device-level fund loss, an EAL5+ chip you can look up — Bluetooth and USB-C, $99Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Its ST33J2M0 secure element is certified at EAL5+, one level below the Nano S Plus's EAL6+ chip, so it scores 9 rather than 10
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
by 6 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Ledger Nano X leads
Cypherock X13/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X9/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 6 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
Cypherock X110/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X4/10 out of 10
Genuine check
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Cypherock X17/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X7/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Cypherock X10/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Ledger Nano X leads
Cypherock X14/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X6/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Ledger Nano X leads
Cypherock X18/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X114/20Ledger Nano X14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Cypherock X113.6/30Ledger Nano X14.7/30
Ledger Nano X leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X12.7/10Ledger Nano X2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X13.2/8Ledger Nano X3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X15.5/18Ledger Nano X5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Ledger Nano X unless the term Cypherock X1 leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 10/10 to Ledger Nano X's 4/10 there (weight 27).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Cypherock X1 3/10, Ledger Nano X 9/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Cypherock X1 10/10, Ledger Nano X 4/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Cypherock X1 7/10, Ledger Nano X 7/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Cypherock X1 0/10, Ledger Nano X 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Cypherock X1 4/10, Ledger Nano X 6/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Cypherock X1 8/10, Ledger Nano X 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Ledger Nano X scores 3 points above Cypherock X1, led by secure element, maker independence, and fund-loss record. Published scores, out of 100: Cypherock X1 60 (rank 15 of 23 hardware wallets), Ledger Nano X 63 (rank 13 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
