Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Hardware Wallets

Cypherock X1 vs KeepKey KeepKey leads by 2 points.

KeepKey scores 2 points above Cypherock X1, led by checkable keys, maker independence, and fund-loss record. Cypherock X1 ranks #15 and KeepKey #14 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Cypherock X160
KeepKey62
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #15 and #14 of 23
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 6 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-CYPHEROCK-X1-VS-KEEPKEY-76b8f107
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

KeepKey leads by 2 points

KeepKey scores 2 points above Cypherock X1, led by checkable keys, maker independence, and fund-loss record.

Cypherock X1 #15 of 2360
KeepKey #14 of 2362
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termKeepKey leads on 3 of 6 published criteria; Cypherock X1 on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermKeepKeyCypherock X1WeightPoints
Secure element0/103/106.5−5.1for Cypherock X1−2.6 of 32
Checkable keys4/100/102.9+3.0for KeepKey+1.5 of 32
Genuine check5/107/102.9−1.5for Cypherock X1−0.8 of 32
Maker independence10/104/102.6+4.1for KeepKey+2.1 of 32
Fund-loss record10/108/102.6+1.4for KeepKey+0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+1.9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+2.1
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6260+2.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

  • KeepKey's lead rests on lighter criteria: Cypherock X1 is ahead on secure element, which carries more weight (27) than any criterion KeepKey leads on (12).
Quick facts

At a glance

3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactCypherock X1KeepKey
One-time priceSnapshotCypherock X1 Basic (one vault, four cards): the maker's store feed https://api-commerce.cypherock.com/api/products reads "price":99,"compareAtPrice":129, read 1 October 2026; the same feed names "currency":"USD" (read 28 October 2026).KeepKey at $59.95 ("Buy Now — $59.95") on https://keepkey.com/product, read 1 October 2026.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL5+ certified; firmware open source; no air-gapped signing.No secure element; fully open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Cypherock X1

60#15 of 23
Pick it when
Pick Cypherock X1 if secure element matters most — it scores 3/10 to KeepKey's 0/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated

KeepKey

62#14 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick KeepKey if checkable keys matters most — it scores 4/10 to Cypherock X1's 0/10 there (weight 12).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
No secure element: in 2019 Kraken extracted a KeepKey seed in about 15 minutes with the device in hand, through a chip flaw no firmware update can fix; a strong passphrase is the defence
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

Cypherock X1

Choose Cypherock X1 if secure element matters most

  • Secure element: 3/10 against 0/10 for KeepKey (weight 27)
  • Genuine check: 7/10 against 5/10 for KeepKey (weight 12)
KeepKeyLeads

Choose KeepKey if checkable keys matters most

  • Checkable keys: 4/10 against 0/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 12)
  • Maker independence: 10/10 against 4/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
  • Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 8/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Secure element

by 3 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
Cypherock X13 out of 10
KeepKey0 out of 10

Rebuildable firmware

weight 6.5 of 86Tie
Cypherock X110 out of 10
KeepKey10 out of 10

Genuine check

by 2 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
Cypherock X17 out of 10
KeepKey5 out of 10

Checkable keys

by 4 of 10weight 2.9 of 86KeepKey leads
Cypherock X10 out of 10
KeepKey4 out of 10

Maker independence

by 6 of 10weight 2.6 of 86KeepKey leads
Cypherock X14 out of 10
KeepKey10 out of 10

Fund-loss record

by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86KeepKey leads
Cypherock X18 out of 10
KeepKey10 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X114/20KeepKey14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Cypherock X113.6/30KeepKey14.4/30
KeepKey leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X12.7/10KeepKey2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X13.2/8KeepKey3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Cypherock X15.5/18KeepKey5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose KeepKey unless the term Cypherock X1 leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick Cypherock X1 if secure element matters most — it scores 3/10 to KeepKey's 0/10 there (weight 27).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Cypherock X1 3/10, KeepKey 0/10)
    Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Cypherock X1 10/10, KeepKey 10/10)
    Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Cypherock X1 7/10, KeepKey 5/10)
    Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Cypherock X1 0/10, KeepKey 4/10)
    Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Cypherock X1 4/10, KeepKey 10/10)
    Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Cypherock X1 8/10, KeepKey 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

KeepKey scores 2 points above Cypherock X1, led by checkable keys, maker independence, and fund-loss record. Published scores, out of 100: Cypherock X1 60 (rank 15 of 23 hardware wallets), KeepKey 62 (rank 14 of 23).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research