Cryptohopper vs HaasOnline Cryptohopper leads by 11 points.
Cryptohopper scores 11 points above HaasOnline, on availability rather than any published criterion. Cryptohopper ranks #3 and HaasOnline #7 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Cryptohopper67
vs
HaasOnline56
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #3 and #7 of 9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.2
Reproduced gap+11.2
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6756+11.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Cryptohopper leads on no published criterion; HaasOnline is ahead on custody. The gap comes from availability.
CryptohopperScore 67Cloud-based trading bot with strategy marketplace and signal subscriptionsStrength: Strategy-marketplace followersWatch-out: Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-holdHaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactCryptohopperHaasOnline
Monthly priceSnapshotExplorer $29/mo, Adventurer $69/mo, Hero $129/mo at monthly billing; annual billing is 17% off ($24.16 / $57.50 / $107.50 a month, billed yearly). There is no free tier — only a 3-day Explorer trial that starts at sign-up. Copy Bot is priced separately, $9.99 to $99.99/mo, and marketplace strategies are extra. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Explorer 19 → 29, Adventurer 49 → 69, Hero 99 → 129), the annual discount was 17% and not the ~30% recorded, and the record’s claim of a paper-trading free tier was wrong — paper trading sits inside the paid Explorer package.Monthly by card: Starter $19.99, Standard $49.99, Pro $99.99, TradeServer (self-hosted or managed) $249.99; Enterprise on request. Annual by card is 16% off ($16.79 / $41.99 / $83.99 / $209.99 a month; $201.50 / $503.90 / $1,007.90 / $2,519.90 a year). Paying the year once in crypto is 40% off ($11.99 / $29.99 / $59.99 / $149.99 a month; $143.93 / $359.93 / $719.93 / $1,799.93), settled in Bitcoin via BTCPay. Yearly crypto plans are not refundable, and monthly card plans refund no unused time. A 7-day trial with every Standard feature needs no card. Only TradeServer keeps keys on your own infrastructure; Starter to Pro run in HaasOnline’s cloud. Re-read 2026-09-14: the page defaults to annual crypto billing, and the $11.99–$149.99 figures previously recorded as monthly prices are the crypto-annual rates.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchangesAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; HaasScript supports arbitrary strategy logic
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Cryptohopper
67#3 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Cryptohopper leads on no published criterion; its edge is availability (20 vs 14 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
Strength
Strategy-marketplace followers
Tradeoff
Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-hold
HaasOnline
56#7 of 9
Pick it when
Pick HaasOnline if custody matters most — it scores 7/10 to Cryptohopper's 5/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Technical users building custom strategies
Tradeoff
Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
CryptohopperLeads
Cryptohopper leads HaasOnline on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
CryptohopperScore 67Cloud-based trading bot with strategy marketplace and signal subscriptionsStrength: Strategy-marketplace followersWatch-out: Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-hold
HaasOnline
Choose HaasOnline if custody matters most
Custody: 7/10 against 5/10 for Cryptohopper (weight 30)
Capability: 9/10 against 6/10 for Cryptohopper (weight 24)
HaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
by 2 of 10weight 7.2 of 86HaasOnline leads
Cryptohopper5/10 out of 10
HaasOnline7/10 out of 10
True cost
weight 6.2 of 86Tie
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Capability
by 3 of 10weight 5.8 of 86HaasOnline leads
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
HaasOnline9/10 out of 10
Reliability
weight 4.8 of 86Tie
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Cryptohopper20/20HaasOnline14/20
Cryptohopper leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Cryptohopper13.7/30HaasOnline16.8/30
HaasOnline leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Cryptohopper2.7/10HaasOnline2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Cryptohopper3.2/8HaasOnline3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Cryptohopper8.3/18HaasOnline6.9/18
Cryptohopper leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Cryptohopper unless the term HaasOnline leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick HaasOnline if custody matters most — it scores 7/10 to Cryptohopper's 5/10 there (weight 30).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (Cryptohopper 6/10, HaasOnline 6/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Cryptohopper scores 11 points above HaasOnline, on availability rather than any published criterion. Published scores, out of 100: Cryptohopper 67 (rank 3 of 9 trading bots), HaasOnline 56 (rank 7 of 9).
ReviewedRe-read due since The published cadence is 45 days; this page's next read was due on 29 October 2026.Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
