Cryptohopper vs Coinrule Cryptohopper leads by 18 points.
Cryptohopper scores 18 points above Coinrule, led by true cost, capability, and reliability. Cryptohopper ranks #3 and Coinrule #9 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Cryptohopper67
vs
Coinrule49
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #3 and #9 of 9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.2
Reproduced gap+18.5
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6749+18.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
CryptohopperScore 67Cloud-based trading bot with strategy marketplace and signal subscriptionsStrength: Strategy-marketplace followersWatch-out: Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-holdCoinruleScore 49No-code automation priced by monthly trade volume, not rule countStrength: No-code rule buildingWatch-out: The real constraint is the monthly trade-volume cap, not the advertised rule count
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactCryptohopperCoinrule
Monthly priceSnapshotExplorer $29/mo, Adventurer $69/mo, Hero $129/mo at monthly billing; annual billing is 17% off ($24.16 / $57.50 / $107.50 a month, billed yearly). There is no free tier — only a 3-day Explorer trial that starts at sign-up. Copy Bot is priced separately, $9.99 to $99.99/mo, and marketplace strategies are extra. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Explorer 19 → 29, Adventurer 49 → 69, Hero 99 → 129), the annual discount was 17% and not the ~30% recorded, and the record’s claim of a paper-trading free tier was wrong — paper trading sits inside the paid Explorer package.Monthly: Free $0 (2 running strategies, $3k monthly volume); Investor $39.99 ($500k monthly volume); Trader $79.99 ($10M); Pro $995 (unlimited volume). Billed yearly: $359, $719 and $8,988, shown as $29.99, $59.99 and $749 a month and up to 25% off. The monthly trade-volume cap, not the rule count, is the binding constraint: unlimited volume is a $79.99 to $995 monthly jump with nothing in between. Coinrule’s own homepage cost estimator still shows ‘Pro $449.99 /m’, contradicting its pricing page. Re-read 2026-09-14: $29.99, $59.99 and $749 are annual-billing rates, not monthly prices.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchangesRule-based automation on crypto spot and, via brokers, stocks and ETFs
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Cryptohopper
67#3 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Cryptohopper if true cost matters most — it scores 6/10 to Coinrule's 3/10 there (weight 26).
Strength
Strategy-marketplace followers
Tradeoff
Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-hold
Coinrule
49#9 of 9
Pick it when
Coinrule leads on no published criterion; its edge is friction (6.7 vs 2.7 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
Strength
No-code rule building
Tradeoff
The real constraint is the monthly trade-volume cap, not the advertised rule count
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
CryptohopperLeads
Choose Cryptohopper if true cost matters most
True cost: 6/10 against 3/10 for Coinrule (weight 26)
Capability: 6/10 against 3/10 for Coinrule (weight 24)
Reliability: 6/10 against 3/10 for Coinrule (weight 20)
CryptohopperScore 67Cloud-based trading bot with strategy marketplace and signal subscriptionsStrength: Strategy-marketplace followersWatch-out: Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-hold
Coinrule
Coinrule leads Cryptohopper on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
CoinruleScore 49No-code automation priced by monthly trade volume, not rule countStrength: No-code rule buildingWatch-out: The real constraint is the monthly trade-volume cap, not the advertised rule count
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
weight 7.2 of 86Tie
Cryptohopper5/10 out of 10
Coinrule5/10 out of 10
True cost
by 3 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Cryptohopper leads
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
Coinrule3/10 out of 10
Capability
by 3 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Cryptohopper leads
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
Coinrule3/10 out of 10
Reliability
by 3 of 10weight 4.8 of 86Cryptohopper leads
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
Coinrule3/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Cryptohopper20/20Coinrule14/20
Cryptohopper leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Cryptohopper13.7/30Coinrule8.6/30
Cryptohopper leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Cryptohopper2.7/10Coinrule6.7/10
Coinrule leads
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Cryptohopper3.2/8Coinrule3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Cryptohopper8.3/18Coinrule8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Cryptohopper unless the term Coinrule leads on is the one you are buying.
Coinrule leads on no published criterion; its edge is friction (6.7 vs 2.7 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (Cryptohopper 6/10, Coinrule 3/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Cryptohopper scores 18 points above Coinrule, led by true cost, capability, and reliability. Published scores, out of 100: Cryptohopper 67 (rank 3 of 9 trading bots), Coinrule 49 (rank 9 of 9).
ReviewedRe-read due since The published cadence is 45 days; this page's next read was due on 29 October 2026.Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
