Cryptohopper vs Bitsgap Cryptohopper leads by 4 points.
Cryptohopper scores 4 points above Bitsgap, led by custody. Cryptohopper ranks #3 and Bitsgap #4 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Cryptohopper67
vs
Bitsgap63
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #3 and #4 of 9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.2
Reproduced gap+4.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6763+4.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
CryptohopperScore 67Cloud-based trading bot with strategy marketplace and signal subscriptionsStrength: Strategy-marketplace followersWatch-out: Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-holdBitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactCryptohopperBitsgap
Monthly priceSnapshotExplorer $29/mo, Adventurer $69/mo, Hero $129/mo at monthly billing; annual billing is 17% off ($24.16 / $57.50 / $107.50 a month, billed yearly). There is no free tier — only a 3-day Explorer trial that starts at sign-up. Copy Bot is priced separately, $9.99 to $99.99/mo, and marketplace strategies are extra. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Explorer 19 → 29, Adventurer 49 → 69, Hero 99 → 129), the annual discount was 17% and not the ~30% recorded, and the record’s claim of a paper-trading free tier was wrong — paper trading sits inside the paid Explorer package.Basic $29/mo, Advanced $69/mo, Pro $149/mo at monthly billing; annual billing shows $23 / $55 / $119 a month. A genuine free plan exists — 3 COMBO bots on Evedex, 20 active bots in demo, unlimited manual trading — alongside a 7-day PRO trial with no card. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Basic 24 → 29, Advanced 44 → 69, Pro 84 → 149) and the record described the free plan as only a trial.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchangesAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; arbitrage logic limited to spot pairs across connected venues
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Cryptohopper
67#3 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Cryptohopper if custody matters most — it scores 5/10 to Bitsgap's 4/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Strategy-marketplace followers
Tradeoff
Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-hold
Bitsgap
63#4 of 9
Pick it when
Pick Bitsgap if reliability matters most — it scores 7/10 to Cryptohopper's 6/10 there (weight 20).
Strength
Active multi-exchange traders
Tradeoff
Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
CryptohopperLeads
Choose Cryptohopper if custody matters most
Custody: 5/10 against 4/10 for Bitsgap (weight 30)
CryptohopperScore 67Cloud-based trading bot with strategy marketplace and signal subscriptionsStrength: Strategy-marketplace followersWatch-out: Marketplace strategy quality varies — many published strategies underperform vs buy-and-hold
Bitsgap
Choose Bitsgap if reliability matters most
Reliability: 7/10 against 6/10 for Cryptohopper (weight 20)
BitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
by 1 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Cryptohopper leads
Cryptohopper5/10 out of 10
Bitsgap4/10 out of 10
True cost
weight 6.2 of 86Tie
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
Capability
weight 5.8 of 86Tie
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
Reliability
by 1 of 10weight 4.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
Cryptohopper6/10 out of 10
Bitsgap7/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Cryptohopper20/20Bitsgap20/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Cryptohopper13.7/30Bitsgap13.4/30
Cryptohopper leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Cryptohopper2.7/10Bitsgap2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Cryptohopper3.2/8Bitsgap3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Cryptohopper8.3/18Bitsgap6.9/18
Cryptohopper leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Cryptohopper unless the term Bitsgap leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Bitsgap if reliability matters most — it scores 7/10 to Cryptohopper's 6/10 there (weight 20).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (Cryptohopper 6/10, Bitsgap 7/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Cryptohopper scores 4 points above Bitsgap, led by custody. Published scores, out of 100: Cryptohopper 67 (rank 3 of 9 trading bots), Bitsgap 63 (rank 4 of 9).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
