Coinify vs Unlimit Crypto Coinify leads by 30 points.
Coinify scores 30 points above Unlimit Crypto, led by purchase cost, quote honesty, and named licence. Coinify ranks #2 and Unlimit Crypto #11 of 16 published onramps. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Coinify75
vs
UNUnlimit Crypto45
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #2 and #11 of 16
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+30.2
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7545+30.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
CoinifyScore 75The pool's fee-schedule anchor - bank 1%, EEA card 3.5%, non-EEA card 5%, 0.50% non-USD FX, network fee separate, all on its own domain - and since 2026-05-29 a register-verified Danish MiCA CASP (FT-ID 10907) whose own legal page has not yet caught up with its authorisation.Strength: All in purchase cost — 8/10Watch-out: The cheap rail is the unlocked one: pay by SEPA (1%) and you contractually accept 'the current available exchange rate at the time Coinify processes your trade' - up to 1-2 business days after you saw the 'indicative' quote - and if the trade cannot proceed, your refund comes back EUR20-30 lighter. The 15-minute rate lock exists only on the 3.5-5% card rail, and only in a help-centre article the Terms never echo.Unlimit CryptoScore 45Cyprus CySEC-authorised CASP onramp/offramp widget (Unlimit Crypto Ltd, 018/24, ΗΕ437355) whose ToS counterparty exactly matches the register — and whose price is unknowable in advance: no fee schedule exists anywhere, quotes live behind an authenticated API with no lock window, and the terms declare all orders final and non-refundable.Strength: Licence identity — 7/10Watch-out: You cannot know the price before you start and you have no refund right after you pay: no fee schedule exists anywhere on Unlimit's surfaces, the terms let the settled amount 'be different from the amounts presented to User', all orders are 'final and cannot be refunded/returned', Unlimit may cancel 'without advance notice... and without providing reason' — and your entire written recourse is a contact form and a complaint answered within 14 days under Cyprus law.
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactCoinifyUnlimit Crypto
PricingSnapshotCoinify "Trading Fees" page (https://www.coinify.com/trading-fees), fetched 28 September 2026, HTTP 200, unchanged from 18 August 2026. Handling fee: "BUY ORDERS Bank Transfer 1% Credit/Debit Card EEA *3.5% Credit/Debit Card 5%" with "* EU, NORWAY, ICELAND, LIECHTENSTEIN, SWITZERLAND"; sell side "Bank Transfer 1%". Conversion fee: "For all purchases done in currencies other than USD, a foreign exchange fee of 0.50% applies." Network fee: "A fee deducted from the purchased cryptocurrency amount." and "It depends on the Blockchain network’s current transaction volumes." Worked example (our arithmetic, not a Coinify figure): a EUR 200 purchase by SEPA bank transfer = 1 percent handling + 0.50 percent FX = EUR 3.00 plus the network fee; by EEA card = 3.5 percent + 0.50 percent = EUR 8.00 plus the network fee. The exchange-rate margin is not on this page: Coinify's help article 360013699059 says fees "are included in the exchange rate we offer you" without a number. Minimums are on help article 360013698319 (edited 13 December 2024), not on this page.No published fee schedule. Unlimit Crypto User Terms (PDF at https://cdn.unlimit.com/site-crypto/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/27064344/2025-06-Unl-Crypto_User-TC_06.2025.pdf, "Last updated: 27.06.2025"), fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, name fee types without a number: "Processing Fee is due for payment by User in Fiat." and "Any other fees that are applicable and effective at the time of User Order.", set "at the sole discretion of Unlimit Crypto" (section 5.1); "User Fees shall be presented to User prior to processing of User Order." (section 5.2). Numeric fees exist only per quote through the authenticated Get-a-quote API (fields processingFee, networkFee, markupFee on docs.gatefi.com). The former brand site www.crypto.unlimit.com, including /pricing/, now redirects (HTTP 301) to stable.com, an Unlimit-group stablecoin app whose User Terms (v2, 24.06.2026) also carry no onramp fee number. A EUR 200 all-in cannot be reconstructed from any published page.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshoteurope, asia, latameurope, latam, africa
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Coinify
75#2 of 16
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Coinify if purchase cost matters most — it scores 8/10 to Unlimit Crypto's 1/10 there (weight 34).
Strength
All in purchase cost — 8/10
Tradeoff
The cheap rail is the unlocked one: pay by SEPA (1%) and you contractually accept 'the current available exchange rate at the time Coinify processes your trade' - up to 1-2 business days after you saw the 'indicative' quote - and if the trade cannot proceed, your refund comes back EUR20-30 lighter. The 15-minute rate lock exists only on the 3.5-5% card rail, and only in a help-centre article the Terms never echo.
UN
Unlimit Crypto
45#11 of 16
Pick it when
Unlimit Crypto leads Coinify on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Licence identity — 7/10
Tradeoff
You cannot know the price before you start and you have no refund right after you pay: no fee schedule exists anywhere on Unlimit's surfaces, the terms let the settled amount 'be different from the amounts presented to User', all orders are 'final and cannot be refunded/returned', Unlimit may cancel 'without advance notice... and without providing reason' — and your entire written recourse is a contact form and a complaint answered within 14 days under Cyprus law.
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
CoinifyLeads
Choose Coinify if purchase cost matters most
Purchase cost: 8/10 against 1/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 34)
Quote honesty: 5/10 against 2/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 26)
Named licence: 8/10 against 7/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 22)
CoinifyScore 75The pool's fee-schedule anchor - bank 1%, EEA card 3.5%, non-EEA card 5%, 0.50% non-USD FX, network fee separate, all on its own domain - and since 2026-05-29 a register-verified Danish MiCA CASP (FT-ID 10907) whose own legal page has not yet caught up with its authorisation.Strength: All in purchase cost — 8/10Watch-out: The cheap rail is the unlocked one: pay by SEPA (1%) and you contractually accept 'the current available exchange rate at the time Coinify processes your trade' - up to 1-2 business days after you saw the 'indicative' quote - and if the trade cannot proceed, your refund comes back EUR20-30 lighter. The 15-minute rate lock exists only on the 3.5-5% card rail, and only in a help-centre article the Terms never echo.
UNUnlimit Crypto
Unlimit Crypto leads Coinify on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Unlimit CryptoScore 45Cyprus CySEC-authorised CASP onramp/offramp widget (Unlimit Crypto Ltd, 018/24, ΗΕ437355) whose ToS counterparty exactly matches the register — and whose price is unknowable in advance: no fee schedule exists anywhere, quotes live behind an authenticated API with no lock window, and the terms declare all orders final and non-refundable.Strength: Licence identity — 7/10Watch-out: You cannot know the price before you start and you have no refund right after you pay: no fee schedule exists anywhere on Unlimit's surfaces, the terms let the settled amount 'be different from the amounts presented to User', all orders are 'final and cannot be refunded/returned', Unlimit may cancel 'without advance notice... and without providing reason' — and your entire written recourse is a contact form and a complaint answered within 14 days under Cyprus law.
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Purchase cost
by 7 of 10weight 8.2 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify8/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto1/10 out of 10
Quote honesty
by 3 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify5/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto2/10 out of 10
Named licence
by 1 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify8/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto7/10 out of 10
KYC and speed
by 4 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify7/10 out of 10
Unlimit Crypto3/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Coinify12/20Unlimit Crypto12/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Coinify16.9/30Unlimit Crypto7.1/30
Coinify leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Coinify2.7/10Unlimit Crypto2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Coinify3.2/8Unlimit Crypto3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Coinify10.1/18Unlimit Crypto8.3/18
Coinify leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Coinify unless the term Unlimit Crypto leads on is the one you are buying.
Unlimit Crypto leads Coinify on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
Scored by Whose money-transmission licence is my money riding — and is that entity my counterparty? · 22% (Coinify 8/10, Unlimit Crypto 7/10)
Execution failure: you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
Scored by Is the number on the widget the number that settles? · 26% (Coinify 5/10, Unlimit Crypto 2/10)
Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
Scored by How much identity do I surrender before the coins land in my wallet, and how long does that take? · 18% (Coinify 7/10, Unlimit Crypto 3/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What does a €200 purchase actually cost me — by card and by bank, all-in? (34%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Coinify scores 30 points above Unlimit Crypto, led by purchase cost, quote honesty, and named licence. Published scores, out of 100: Coinify 75 (rank 2 of 16 onramps), Unlimit Crypto 45 (rank 11 of 16).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
