Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Onramps

Coinify vs Transak Transak leads by 6 points.

Transak scores 6 points above Coinify, led by quote honesty. Coinify ranks #2 and Transak #1 of 16 published onramps. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Coinify75
Transak81
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #2 and #1 of 16
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-COINIFY-VS-TRANSAK-0534bf37
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Transak leads by 6 points

Transak scores 6 points above Coinify, led by quote honesty.

Coinify #2 of 1675
Transak #1 of 1681
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termTransak leads on 1 of 4 published criteria; Coinify on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermTransakCoinifyWeightPoints
Purchase cost7/108/108.2−2.1for Coinify−1.1 of 32
Quote honesty6/105/106.2+1.6for Transak+0.8 of 32
Named licence6/108/105.3−2.7for Coinify−1.4 of 32
Measured dataScore dimension13.810.118+9.6for Transak
Net of the terms+6.4
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+6.2
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8175+6.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

  • Transak's lead rests on lighter criteria: Coinify is ahead on purchase cost, which carries more weight (34) than any criterion Transak leads on (26).
Quick facts

At a glance

1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactCoinifyTransak
Purchase spreadSnapshotCoinify "Trading Fees" page (https://www.coinify.com/trading-fees), fetched 28 September 2026, HTTP 200, unchanged from 18 August 2026. Handling fee: "BUY ORDERS Bank Transfer 1% Credit/Debit Card EEA *3.5% Credit/Debit Card 5%" with "* EU, NORWAY, ICELAND, LIECHTENSTEIN, SWITZERLAND"; sell side "Bank Transfer 1%". Conversion fee: "For all purchases done in currencies other than USD, a foreign exchange fee of 0.50% applies." Network fee: "A fee deducted from the purchased cryptocurrency amount." and "It depends on the Blockchain network’s current transaction volumes." Worked example (our arithmetic, not a Coinify figure): a EUR 200 purchase by SEPA bank transfer = 1 percent handling + 0.50 percent FX = EUR 3.00 plus the network fee; by EEA card = 3.5 percent + 0.50 percent = EUR 8.00 plus the network fee. The exchange-rate margin is not on this page: Coinify's help article 360013699059 says fees "are included in the exchange rate we offer you" without a number. Minimums are on help article 360013698319 (edited 13 December 2024), not on this page.Transak help-centre article "How does Transak calculate prices and fees?" (https://support.transak.com/en/articles/7845942-how-does-transak-calculate-prices-and-fees), fetched 28 September 2026, HTTP 200 ("Updated over 3 weeks ago"). On-ramp fees: SEPA Transfer "0.99% of transaction amount, minimum 1 EUR"; Credit / Debit Card (EUR) "3.5% of transaction amount + 1 EUR"; Credit / Debit Card (non-EUR) "5.5% of transaction amount + 1 EUR"; Apple Pay / Google Pay (EUR) "3.5% of transaction amount, minimum 1 EUR", (non-EUR) "5.5% of transaction amount, minimum 1 EUR". Rate: "The quoted rate reflects the rate provided via the publicly available market pricing tool CoinGecko at the time of the transaction, plus a spread of 0% to 2.5%, depending on how volatile the currency is at the time." (on 18 August 2026 the same sentence read "plus a spread of 2.5%"). Third-party fees (gas, validator, liquidity) are separate and "displayed before you confirm your transaction". Worked example (our arithmetic, not a Transak figure): a EUR 200 purchase by SEPA = EUR 1.98 fee plus a spread of 0 to 2.5 percent over CoinGecko, an all-in of roughly 1 to 3.5 percent plus network fees; by EUR card = EUR 8.00 fee plus the same spread, roughly 4 to 6.5 percent. A second, USD-denominated on-ramp fee table on transak.com/fees-pricing-calculation (linked as "Pricing & Fees" from the compliance page) prices cards and bank transfers differently and does not say which jurisdiction it applies to.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshoteurope, asia, latamus, europe, ca
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Coinify

75#2 of 16
Pick it when
Pick Coinify if purchase cost matters most — it scores 8/10 to Transak's 7/10 there (weight 34).
Strength
All in purchase cost — 8/10
Tradeoff
The cheap rail is the unlocked one: pay by SEPA (1%) and you contractually accept 'the current available exchange rate at the time Coinify processes your trade' - up to 1-2 business days after you saw the 'indicative' quote - and if the trade cannot proceed, your refund comes back EUR20-30 lighter. The 15-minute rate lock exists only on the 3.5-5% card rail, and only in a help-centre article the Terms never echo.

Transak

81#1 of 16
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Transak if quote honesty matters most — it scores 6/10 to Coinify's 5/10 there (weight 26).
Strength
All in purchase cost — 7/10
Tradeoff
The number on the confirm button is not the number that settles: the quote is 'valid only for a short period — generally between 5 and 10 seconds', settlement on bank rails happens at the 'Market Price (at time of bank transfer settlement)', and standard SEPA 'May take up to 3-5 Working Days' — so the buyer wears up to five days of market move, and with a spread of 0% to 2.5% over CoinGecko on top of the 0.99% fee the cheap bank rail lands anywhere from roughly 1% to 3.5% all-in (fee article read 2026-09-28) — though that day Transak's coverage page and countries API listed no EU state and its fiat API offered EUR with no SEPA option.
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

Coinify

Choose Coinify if purchase cost matters most

  • Purchase cost: 8/10 against 7/10 for Transak (weight 34)
  • Named licence: 8/10 against 6/10 for Transak (weight 22)
TransakLeads

Choose Transak if quote honesty matters most

  • Quote honesty: 6/10 against 5/10 for Coinify (weight 26)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Purchase cost

by 1 of 10weight 8.2 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify8 out of 10
Transak7 out of 10

Quote honesty

by 1 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Transak leads
Coinify5 out of 10
Transak6 out of 10

Named licence

by 2 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify8 out of 10
Transak6 out of 10

KYC and speed

weight 4.3 of 86Tie
Coinify7 out of 10
Transak7 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Coinify12/20Transak12/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Coinify16.9/30Transak15.6/30
Coinify leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Coinify2.7/10Transak2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Coinify3.2/8Transak3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Coinify10.1/18Transak13.8/18
Transak leads
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Transak unless the term Coinify leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick Coinify if purchase cost matters most — it scores 8/10 to Transak's 7/10 there (weight 34).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
    Scored by Whose money-transmission licence is my money riding — and is that entity my counterparty? · 22% (Coinify 8/10, Transak 6/10)
  • Execution failure: you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
    Scored by Is the number on the widget the number that settles? · 26% (Coinify 5/10, Transak 6/10)
  • Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
    Scored by How much identity do I surrender before the coins land in my wallet, and how long does that take? · 18% (Coinify 7/10, Transak 7/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What does a €200 purchase actually cost me — by card and by bank, all-in? (34%).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Transak scores 6 points above Coinify, led by quote honesty. Published scores, out of 100: Coinify 75 (rank 2 of 16 onramps), Transak 81 (rank 1 of 16).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research