Coinify scores 34 points above Onmeta, led by purchase cost, quote honesty, and named licence. Coinify ranks #2 and Onmeta #14 of 16 published onramps. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Coinify75
vs
OMOnmeta41
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #2 and #14 of 16
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+43.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7541+34.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
A floor bound on one row means the criterion arithmetic does not reproduce the displayed gap exactly.
CoinifyScore 75The pool's fee-schedule anchor - bank 1%, EEA card 3.5%, non-EEA card 5%, 0.50% non-USD FX, network fee separate, all on its own domain - and since 2026-05-29 a register-verified Danish MiCA CASP (FT-ID 10907) whose own legal page has not yet caught up with its authorisation.Strength: All in purchase cost — 8/10Watch-out: The cheap rail is the unlocked one: pay by SEPA (1%) and you contractually accept 'the current available exchange rate at the time Coinify processes your trade' - up to 1-2 business days after you saw the 'indicative' quote - and if the trade cannot proceed, your refund comes back EUR20-30 lighter. The 15-minute rate lock exists only on the 3.5-5% card rail, and only in a help-centre article the Terms never echo.OnmetaScore 41FIU-IND-registered Indian B2B onramp widget/API (Abhibha Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) running UPI, GCash and QRIS rails across India, the Philippines and Indonesia — with no published fee schedule anywhere on its surfaces and a terms-level 1% 'spillage' clause instead of a rate lock.Strength: Kyc friction time to coins — 6/10Watch-out: You cannot learn what a purchase costs before starting one — no fee schedule exists anywhere on Onmeta's surfaces, the widget quote at transaction time is the first number you ever see, and the terms you accept pre-waive chargebacks and pre-authorize a non-refundable shortfall of up to 1% ('spillage') on what actually arrives.
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactCoinifyOnmeta
PricingSnapshotCoinify "Trading Fees" page (https://www.coinify.com/trading-fees), fetched 28 September 2026, HTTP 200, unchanged from 18 August 2026. Handling fee: "BUY ORDERS Bank Transfer 1% Credit/Debit Card EEA *3.5% Credit/Debit Card 5%" with "* EU, NORWAY, ICELAND, LIECHTENSTEIN, SWITZERLAND"; sell side "Bank Transfer 1%". Conversion fee: "For all purchases done in currencies other than USD, a foreign exchange fee of 0.50% applies." Network fee: "A fee deducted from the purchased cryptocurrency amount." and "It depends on the Blockchain network’s current transaction volumes." Worked example (our arithmetic, not a Coinify figure): a EUR 200 purchase by SEPA bank transfer = 1 percent handling + 0.50 percent FX = EUR 3.00 plus the network fee; by EEA card = 3.5 percent + 0.50 percent = EUR 8.00 plus the network fee. The exchange-rate margin is not on this page: Coinify's help article 360013699059 says fees "are included in the exchange rate we offer you" without a number. Minimums are on help article 360013698319 (edited 13 December 2024), not on this page.No processing fee, spread or minimum is published. Onmeta widget FAQ (https://docs.onmeta.in/docs/widget/faq/), fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200: its "Pricing & Fees" section answers only "Gas fee varies from chain to chain. It is calculated using a combination of gas price and gas units needed to process the transaction." and, for the sell side, "We deduct TDS only for off-ramp transactions. TDS is 1% based on the latest ruling by the Government of India." The end-user terms (https://onmeta.in/terms-endusers-2) say only "You will be required to pay certain fees on each transaction you undertake on Onmeta. It will be reflected on the API while you undertake each transaction." The homepage routes pricing to "Schedule a Demo". No purchase can be priced from a published page.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshoteurope, asia, latamasia
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Coinify
75#2 of 16
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Coinify if purchase cost matters most — it scores 8/10 to Onmeta's 1/10 there (weight 34).
Strength
All in purchase cost — 8/10
Tradeoff
The cheap rail is the unlocked one: pay by SEPA (1%) and you contractually accept 'the current available exchange rate at the time Coinify processes your trade' - up to 1-2 business days after you saw the 'indicative' quote - and if the trade cannot proceed, your refund comes back EUR20-30 lighter. The 15-minute rate lock exists only on the 3.5-5% card rail, and only in a help-centre article the Terms never echo.
OM
Onmeta
41#14 of 16
Pick it when
Onmeta leads Coinify on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Kyc friction time to coins — 6/10
Tradeoff
You cannot learn what a purchase costs before starting one — no fee schedule exists anywhere on Onmeta's surfaces, the widget quote at transaction time is the first number you ever see, and the terms you accept pre-waive chargebacks and pre-authorize a non-refundable shortfall of up to 1% ('spillage') on what actually arrives.
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
CoinifyLeads
Choose Coinify if purchase cost matters most
Purchase cost: 8/10 against 1/10 for Onmeta (weight 34)
Quote honesty: 5/10 against 4/10 for Onmeta (weight 26)
Named licence: 8/10 against 4/10 for Onmeta (weight 22)
CoinifyScore 75The pool's fee-schedule anchor - bank 1%, EEA card 3.5%, non-EEA card 5%, 0.50% non-USD FX, network fee separate, all on its own domain - and since 2026-05-29 a register-verified Danish MiCA CASP (FT-ID 10907) whose own legal page has not yet caught up with its authorisation.Strength: All in purchase cost — 8/10Watch-out: The cheap rail is the unlocked one: pay by SEPA (1%) and you contractually accept 'the current available exchange rate at the time Coinify processes your trade' - up to 1-2 business days after you saw the 'indicative' quote - and if the trade cannot proceed, your refund comes back EUR20-30 lighter. The 15-minute rate lock exists only on the 3.5-5% card rail, and only in a help-centre article the Terms never echo.
OMOnmeta
Onmeta leads Coinify on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
OnmetaScore 41FIU-IND-registered Indian B2B onramp widget/API (Abhibha Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) running UPI, GCash and QRIS rails across India, the Philippines and Indonesia — with no published fee schedule anywhere on its surfaces and a terms-level 1% 'spillage' clause instead of a rate lock.Strength: Kyc friction time to coins — 6/10Watch-out: You cannot learn what a purchase costs before starting one — no fee schedule exists anywhere on Onmeta's surfaces, the widget quote at transaction time is the first number you ever see, and the terms you accept pre-waive chargebacks and pre-authorize a non-refundable shortfall of up to 1% ('spillage') on what actually arrives.
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Purchase cost
by 7 of 10weight 8.2 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify8/10 out of 10
Onmeta1/10 out of 10
Quote honesty
by 1 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify5/10 out of 10
Onmeta4/10 out of 10
Named licence
by 4 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify8/10 out of 10
Onmeta4/10 out of 10
KYC and speed
by 1 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Coinify leads
Coinify7/10 out of 10
Onmeta6/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Coinify12/20Onmeta6/20
Coinify leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Coinify16.9/30Onmeta8/30
Coinify leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Coinify2.7/10Onmeta2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Coinify3.2/8Onmeta3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Coinify10.1/18Onmeta8.3/18
Coinify leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Coinify unless the term Onmeta leads on is the one you are buying.
Onmeta leads Coinify on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
Scored by Whose money-transmission licence is my money riding — and is that entity my counterparty? · 22% (Coinify 8/10, Onmeta 4/10)
Execution failure: you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
Scored by Is the number on the widget the number that settles? · 26% (Coinify 5/10, Onmeta 4/10)
Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
Scored by How much identity do I surrender before the coins land in my wallet, and how long does that take? · 18% (Coinify 7/10, Onmeta 6/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What does a €200 purchase actually cost me — by card and by bank, all-in? (34%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Coinify scores 34 points above Onmeta, led by purchase cost, quote honesty, and named licence. Published scores, out of 100: Coinify 75 (rank 2 of 16 onramps), Onmeta 41 (rank 14 of 16).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
