Bitsgap scores 7 points above HaasOnline, led by reliability. Bitsgap ranks #4 and HaasOnline #7 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Bitsgap63
vs
HaasOnline56
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #4 and #7 of 9
Bitsgap scores 7 points above HaasOnline, led by reliability.
Bitsgap #4 of 963
HaasOnline #7 of 956
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termBitsgap leads on 1 of 4 published criteria; HaasOnline on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermBitsgapHaasOnlineWeightPoints
Custody4/107/107.2−5.6for HaasOnline−2.9 of 32
Capability6/109/105.8−4.5for HaasOnline−2.3 of 32
Reliability7/106/104.8+1.2for Bitsgap+0.6 of 32
AvailabilityScore dimension201420+15.6for Bitsgap
Net of the terms+6.7
Reproduced gap+6.8
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6356+7.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Bitsgap's lead rests on lighter criteria: HaasOnline is ahead on custody, which carries more weight (30) than any criterion Bitsgap leads on (20).
BitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your sizeHaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactBitsgapHaasOnline
Monthly priceSnapshotBasic $29/mo, Advanced $69/mo, Pro $149/mo at monthly billing; annual billing shows $23 / $55 / $119 a month. A genuine free plan exists — 3 COMBO bots on Evedex, 20 active bots in demo, unlimited manual trading — alongside a 7-day PRO trial with no card. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Basic 24 → 29, Advanced 44 → 69, Pro 84 → 149) and the record described the free plan as only a trial.Monthly by card: Starter $19.99, Standard $49.99, Pro $99.99, TradeServer (self-hosted or managed) $249.99; Enterprise on request. Annual by card is 16% off ($16.79 / $41.99 / $83.99 / $209.99 a month; $201.50 / $503.90 / $1,007.90 / $2,519.90 a year). Paying the year once in crypto is 40% off ($11.99 / $29.99 / $59.99 / $149.99 a month; $143.93 / $359.93 / $719.93 / $1,799.93), settled in Bitcoin via BTCPay. Yearly crypto plans are not refundable, and monthly card plans refund no unused time. A 7-day trial with every Standard feature needs no card. Only TradeServer keeps keys on your own infrastructure; Starter to Pro run in HaasOnline’s cloud. Re-read 2026-09-14: the page defaults to annual crypto billing, and the $11.99–$149.99 figures previously recorded as monthly prices are the crypto-annual rates.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; arbitrage logic limited to spot pairs across connected venuesAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; HaasScript supports arbitrary strategy logic
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Bitsgap
63#4 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Bitsgap if reliability matters most — it scores 7/10 to HaasOnline's 6/10 there (weight 20).
Strength
Active multi-exchange traders
Tradeoff
Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
HaasOnline
56#7 of 9
Pick it when
Pick HaasOnline if custody matters most — it scores 7/10 to Bitsgap's 4/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Technical users building custom strategies
Tradeoff
Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
BitsgapLeads
Choose Bitsgap if reliability matters most
Reliability: 7/10 against 6/10 for HaasOnline (weight 20)
BitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
HaasOnline
Choose HaasOnline if custody matters most
Custody: 7/10 against 4/10 for Bitsgap (weight 30)
Capability: 9/10 against 6/10 for Bitsgap (weight 24)
HaasOnlineScore 56Professional-grade bot platform with HaasScript — used by trading desksStrength: Technical users building custom strategiesWatch-out: Steep learning curve — HaasScript is real code, not a no-code builder
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
by 3 of 10weight 7.2 of 86HaasOnline leads
Bitsgap4/10 out of 10
HaasOnline7/10 out of 10
True cost
weight 6.2 of 86Tie
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Capability
by 3 of 10weight 5.8 of 86HaasOnline leads
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
HaasOnline9/10 out of 10
Reliability
by 1 of 10weight 4.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
Bitsgap7/10 out of 10
HaasOnline6/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Bitsgap20/20HaasOnline14/20
Bitsgap leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Bitsgap13.4/30HaasOnline16.8/30
HaasOnline leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Bitsgap2.7/10HaasOnline2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Bitsgap3.2/8HaasOnline3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Bitsgap6.9/18HaasOnline6.9/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Bitsgap unless the term HaasOnline leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick HaasOnline if custody matters most — it scores 7/10 to Bitsgap's 4/10 there (weight 30).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (Bitsgap 7/10, HaasOnline 6/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Bitsgap scores 7 points above HaasOnline, led by reliability. Published scores, out of 100: Bitsgap 63 (rank 4 of 9 trading bots), HaasOnline 56 (rank 7 of 9).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
