Bitsgap scores 7 points above Gunbot, led by true cost, capability, and reliability. Bitsgap ranks #4 and Gunbot #8 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Bitsgap63
vs
Gunbot56
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #4 and #8 of 9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+7.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Bitsgap's lead rests on lighter criteria: Gunbot is ahead on custody, which carries more weight (30) than any criterion Bitsgap leads on (26).
BitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your sizeGunbotScore 56Self-hosted lifetime licence — validated against the GUNTHY token count of your walletStrength: Self-hosters preferring one-time licences over subscriptionsWatch-out: The “lifetime” licence links to a wallet address and its GUNTHY token count, so it depends on that wallet and on the token-based validation system
Quick facts
At a glance
FactBitsgapGunbot
PricingSnapshotBasic $29/mo, Advanced $69/mo, Pro $149/mo at monthly billing; annual billing shows $23 / $55 / $119 a month. A genuine free plan exists — 3 COMBO bots on Evedex, 20 active bots in demo, unlimited manual trading — alongside a 7-day PRO trial with no card. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Basic 24 → 29, Advanced 44 → 69, Pro 84 → 149) and the record described the free plan as only a trial.One-time licence with contradictory official pricing. The plans page lists Standard €199, Pro €299 and DeFi €499 under ‘Summer deals’ at €44.25, €111.75 and €186.75 lifetime (about 78%, 63% and 63% off), with no stated end date. The support FAQ quotes $599 / $899 / $1,499 lifetime plus Gunbot Unlimited at $29/month, and the Unlimited preview page prices the same subscription at €29 per month. Lifetime licences link to a self-custodied, non-exchange ERC-20 wallet address and its GUNTHY token count; subscription users skip the wallet step. No defensible single price exists; reconcile with support before buying. Re-read 14 September 2026.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; arbitrage logic limited to spot pairs across connected venuesSelf-hosted spot (and venue-dependent futures) bot trading
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalglobal
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Bitsgap
63#4 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Bitsgap if true cost matters most — it scores 6/10 to Gunbot's 1/10 there (weight 26).
Strength
Active multi-exchange traders
Tradeoff
Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
Gunbot
56#8 of 9
Pick it when
Pick Gunbot if custody matters most — it scores 8/10 to Bitsgap's 4/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Self-hosters preferring one-time licences over subscriptions
Tradeoff
The “lifetime” licence links to a wallet address and its GUNTHY token count, so it depends on that wallet and on the token-based validation system
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
BitsgapLeads
Choose Bitsgap if true cost matters most
True cost: 6/10 against 1/10 for Gunbot (weight 26)
Capability: 6/10 against 5/10 for Gunbot (weight 24)
Reliability: 7/10 against 3/10 for Gunbot (weight 20)
BitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
Gunbot
Choose Gunbot if custody matters most
Custody: 8/10 against 4/10 for Bitsgap (weight 30)
GunbotScore 56Self-hosted lifetime licence — validated against the GUNTHY token count of your walletStrength: Self-hosters preferring one-time licences over subscriptionsWatch-out: The “lifetime” licence links to a wallet address and its GUNTHY token count, so it depends on that wallet and on the token-based validation system
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
by 4 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Gunbot leads
Bitsgap4/10 out of 10
Gunbot8/10 out of 10
True cost
by 5 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Bitsgap leads
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
Gunbot1/10 out of 10
Capability
by 1 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
Gunbot5/10 out of 10
Reliability
by 4 of 10weight 4.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
Bitsgap7/10 out of 10
Gunbot3/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Bitsgap20/20Gunbot20/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Bitsgap13.4/30Gunbot10.7/30
Bitsgap leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Bitsgap2.7/10Gunbot1.3/10
Bitsgap leads
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Bitsgap3.2/8Gunbot3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Bitsgap6.9/18Gunbot8.3/18
Gunbot leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Bitsgap unless the term Gunbot leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Gunbot if custody matters most — it scores 8/10 to Bitsgap's 4/10 there (weight 30).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (Bitsgap 7/10, Gunbot 3/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Bitsgap scores 7 points above Gunbot, led by true cost, capability, and reliability. Published scores, out of 100: Bitsgap 63 (rank 4 of 9 trading bots), Gunbot 56 (rank 8 of 9).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
