Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Trading Bots

Bitsgap vs Coinrule Bitsgap leads by 14 points.

Bitsgap scores 14 points above Coinrule, led by true cost, capability, and reliability. Bitsgap ranks #4 and Coinrule #9 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Bitsgap63
Coinrule49
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #4 and #9 of 9
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-BITSGAP-VS-COINRULE-593ec669
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Bitsgap leads by 14 points

Bitsgap scores 14 points above Coinrule, led by true cost, capability, and reliability.

Bitsgap #4 of 963
Coinrule #9 of 949
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termBitsgap leads on 3 of 4 published criteria; Coinrule on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermBitsgapCoinruleWeightPoints
Custody4/105/107.2−1.9for Coinrule−1.0 of 32
True cost6/103/106.2+4.9for Bitsgap+2.5 of 32
Capability6/103/105.8+4.5for Bitsgap+2.3 of 32
Reliability7/103/104.8+5.0for Bitsgap+2.6 of 32
AvailabilityScore dimension201420+15.6for Bitsgap
FrictionScore dimension2.76.710−10.4for Coinrule
Measured dataScore dimension6.98.318−3.6for Coinrule
Net of the terms+14.0
Reproduced gap+14.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

  • Bitsgap's lead rests on lighter criteria: Coinrule is ahead on custody, which carries more weight (30) than any criterion Bitsgap leads on (26).
Quick facts

At a glance

1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactBitsgapCoinrule
Monthly priceSnapshotBasic $29/mo, Advanced $69/mo, Pro $149/mo at monthly billing; annual billing shows $23 / $55 / $119 a month. A genuine free plan exists — 3 COMBO bots on Evedex, 20 active bots in demo, unlimited manual trading — alongside a 7-day PRO trial with no card. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Basic 24 → 29, Advanced 44 → 69, Pro 84 → 149) and the record described the free plan as only a trial.Monthly: Free $0 (2 running strategies, $3k monthly volume); Investor $39.99 ($500k monthly volume); Trader $79.99 ($10M); Pro $995 (unlimited volume). Billed yearly: $359, $719 and $8,988, shown as $29.99, $59.99 and $749 a month and up to 25% off. The monthly trade-volume cap, not the rule count, is the binding constraint: unlimited volume is a $79.99 to $995 monthly jump with nothing in between. Coinrule’s own homepage cost estimator still shows ‘Pro $449.99 /m’, contradicting its pricing page. Re-read 2026-09-14: $29.99, $59.99 and $749 are annual-billing rates, not monthly prices.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; arbitrage logic limited to spot pairs across connected venuesRule-based automation on crypto spot and, via brokers, stocks and ETFs
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Bitsgap

63#4 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Bitsgap if true cost matters most — it scores 6/10 to Coinrule's 3/10 there (weight 26).
Strength
Active multi-exchange traders
Tradeoff
Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size

Coinrule

49#9 of 9
Pick it when
Pick Coinrule if custody matters most — it scores 5/10 to Bitsgap's 4/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
No-code rule building
Tradeoff
The real constraint is the monthly trade-volume cap, not the advertised rule count
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

BitsgapLeads

Choose Bitsgap if true cost matters most

  • True cost: 6/10 against 3/10 for Coinrule (weight 26)
  • Capability: 6/10 against 3/10 for Coinrule (weight 24)
  • Reliability: 7/10 against 3/10 for Coinrule (weight 20)
Coinrule

Choose Coinrule if custody matters most

  • Custody: 5/10 against 4/10 for Bitsgap (weight 30)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Custody

by 1 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Coinrule leads
Bitsgap4 out of 10
Coinrule5 out of 10

True cost

by 3 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Bitsgap leads
Bitsgap6 out of 10
Coinrule3 out of 10

Capability

by 3 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
Bitsgap6 out of 10
Coinrule3 out of 10

Reliability

by 4 of 10weight 4.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
Bitsgap7 out of 10
Coinrule3 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Bitsgap20/20Coinrule14/20
Bitsgap leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Bitsgap13.4/30Coinrule8.6/30
Bitsgap leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Bitsgap2.7/10Coinrule6.7/10
Coinrule leads
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Bitsgap3.2/8Coinrule3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Bitsgap6.9/18Coinrule8.3/18
Coinrule leads
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Bitsgap unless the term Coinrule leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick Coinrule if custody matters most — it scores 5/10 to Bitsgap's 4/10 there (weight 30).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
    Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (Bitsgap 7/10, Coinrule 3/10)
  • Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
    Scored by Key custody posture · 30% (Bitsgap 4/10, Coinrule 5/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Bitsgap scores 14 points above Coinrule, led by true cost, capability, and reliability. Published scores, out of 100: Bitsgap 63 (rank 4 of 9 trading bots), Coinrule 49 (rank 9 of 9).

Related pages

Go deeper

Trust & process
Individual reviews
Other comparisons
Written and reviewed by Founder
Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research