BitBox02 vs Cypherock X1 BitBox02 leads by 16 points.
BitBox02 scores 16 points above Cypherock X1, led by secure element, checkable keys, and maker independence. BitBox02 ranks #3 and Cypherock X1 #15 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
BitBox0276
vs
Cypherock X160
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #3 and #15 of 23
BitBox02 scores 16 points above Cypherock X1, led by secure element, checkable keys, and maker independence.
BitBox02 #3 of 2376
Cypherock X1 #15 of 2360
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termBitBox02 leads on 4 of 6 published criteria; Cypherock X1 on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermBitBox02Cypherock X1WeightPoints
Secure element5/103/106.5+3.4for BitBox02+1.7 of 32
Checkable keys10/100/102.9+7.5for BitBox02+3.8 of 32
Maker independence10/104/102.6+4.1for BitBox02+2.1 of 32
Fund-loss record10/108/102.6+1.4for BitBox02+0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+16.3
Reproduced gap+16.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7660+16.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
BitBox02Score 76Firmware rebuilt and matched, seven years without a fund loss — Swiss, USB-C onlyStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: Its ATECC608B secure chip holds no listed certificate; the EAL6+ chip is in the BitBox02 Nova (€175), ranked as its own rowCypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactBitBox02Cypherock X1
One-time priceSnapshotBitBox02 (original), Multi or Bitcoin-only edition, at €149.00 including 19% VAT on https://shop.bitbox.swiss/en/products/bitbox02-80/, read 1 October 2026; no US dollar list price is published.Cypherock X1 Basic (one vault, four cards): the maker's store feed https://api-commerce.cypherock.com/api/products reads "price":99,"compareAtPrice":129, read 1 October 2026; the same feed names "currency":"USD" (read 28 October 2026).
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, no listed certificate; fully open source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, EAL5+ certified; firmware open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
BitBox02
76#3 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick BitBox02 if secure element matters most — it scores 5/10 to Cypherock X1's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
Its ATECC608B secure chip holds no listed certificate; the EAL6+ chip is in the BitBox02 Nova (€175), ranked as its own row
Cypherock X1
60#15 of 23
Pick it when
Cypherock X1 leads BitBox02 on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
BitBox02Leads
Choose BitBox02 if secure element matters most
Secure element: 5/10 against 3/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 27)
Checkable keys: 10/10 against 0/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 12)
Maker independence: 10/10 against 4/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
BitBox02Score 76Firmware rebuilt and matched, seven years without a fund loss — Swiss, USB-C onlyStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: Its ATECC608B secure chip holds no listed certificate; the EAL6+ chip is in the BitBox02 Nova (€175), ranked as its own row
Cypherock X1
Cypherock X1 leads BitBox02 on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Cypherock X1Score 60Seedless split across a vault and four cards — firmware rebuilt and matchedStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
by 2 of 10weight 6.5 of 86BitBox02 leads
BitBox025/10 out of 10
Cypherock X13/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
BitBox0210/10 out of 10
Cypherock X110/10 out of 10
Genuine check
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
BitBox027/10 out of 10
Cypherock X17/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
by 10 of 10weight 2.9 of 86BitBox02 leads
BitBox0210/10 out of 10
Cypherock X10/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 6 of 10weight 2.6 of 86BitBox02 leads
BitBox0210/10 out of 10
Cypherock X14/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86BitBox02 leads
BitBox0210/10 out of 10
Cypherock X18/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
BitBox0214/20Cypherock X114/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
BitBox0219.9/30Cypherock X113.6/30
BitBox02 leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
BitBox022.7/10Cypherock X12.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
BitBox023.2/8Cypherock X13.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
BitBox025.5/18Cypherock X15.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose BitBox02 unless the term Cypherock X1 leads on is the one you are buying.
Cypherock X1 leads BitBox02 on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (BitBox02 5/10, Cypherock X1 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (BitBox02 10/10, Cypherock X1 10/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (BitBox02 7/10, Cypherock X1 7/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (BitBox02 10/10, Cypherock X1 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (BitBox02 10/10, Cypherock X1 4/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (BitBox02 10/10, Cypherock X1 8/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
BitBox02 scores 16 points above Cypherock X1, led by secure element, checkable keys, and maker independence. Published scores, out of 100: BitBox02 76 (rank 3 of 23 hardware wallets), Cypherock X1 60 (rank 15 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
