Bitsgap scores 5 points above 3Commas, led by custody, true cost, and capability. 3Commas ranks #6 and Bitsgap #4 of 9 published trading bots. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
3Commas58
vs
Bitsgap63
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #6 and #4 of 9
Bitsgap scores 5 points above 3Commas, led by custody, true cost, and capability.
3Commas #6 of 958
Bitsgap #4 of 963
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termBitsgap leads on 4 of 4 published criteria; 3Commas on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermBitsgap3CommasWeightPoints
Custody4/102/107.2+3.7for Bitsgap+1.9 of 32
True cost6/105/106.2+1.6for Bitsgap+0.8 of 32
Capability6/105/105.8+1.5for Bitsgap+0.8 of 32
Reliability7/102/104.8+6.2for Bitsgap+3.2 of 32
Trust recordScore dimension3.26.48−8.3for 3Commas
Net of the terms+4.8
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap+4.7
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6358+5.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
BitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size3CommasScore 58Multi-exchange trading bots with DCA, grid, and signal-driven strategiesStrength: Multi-exchange portfolio rebalancingWatch-out: 2022 API-key disclosure incident (at least 100k Binance and KuCoin API keys exposed, per 3Commas’ own incident FAQ) — verify current 2FA + IP-allowlist hygiene before connecting size
Quick facts
At a glance
Fact3CommasBitsgap
Monthly priceSnapshotStarter $20/mo, Pro $50/mo, Expert $140/mo at monthly billing; annual billing $15 / $38 / $105 a month. Plan caps bind before price: Starter allows 1 active exchange API key, 5 DCA, 2 signal and 2 grid bots. EEA: 3Commas.eu closed on 1 July 2026 with no automatic migration of accounts, bots, orders, subscriptions or settings. New EEA registrations are closed, EEA country selection is blocked at sign-up, and Estonia remains a restricted location. In the company’s own incident FAQ, the December 2022 breach exposed ‘at least 100k Binance and Kucoin API keys and secrets’; 3Commas has never published a loss figure. Re-read 14 September 2026.Basic $29/mo, Advanced $69/mo, Pro $149/mo at monthly billing; annual billing shows $23 / $55 / $119 a month. A genuine free plan exists — 3 COMBO bots on Evedex, 20 active bots in demo, unlimited manual trading — alongside a 7-day PRO trial with no card. Re-read 2026-09-09: every tier had risen (Basic 24 → 29, Advanced 44 → 69, Pro 84 → 149) and the record described the free plan as only a trial.
Asset coverageEditorialAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; bot logic asset-agnosticAny pair tradable on connected exchanges; arbitrage logic limited to spot pairs across connected venues
Region fitSnapshotus, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
3Commas
58#6 of 9
Pick it when
3Commas leads on no published criterion; its edge is trust record (6.4 vs 3.2 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
Strength
Multi-exchange portfolio rebalancing
Tradeoff
2022 API-key disclosure incident (at least 100k Binance and KuCoin API keys exposed, per 3Commas’ own incident FAQ) — verify current 2FA + IP-allowlist hygiene before connecting size
Bitsgap
63#4 of 9
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Bitsgap if custody matters most — it scores 4/10 to 3Commas's 2/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Active multi-exchange traders
Tradeoff
Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
3Commas
3Commas leads Bitsgap on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
3CommasScore 58Multi-exchange trading bots with DCA, grid, and signal-driven strategiesStrength: Multi-exchange portfolio rebalancingWatch-out: 2022 API-key disclosure incident (at least 100k Binance and KuCoin API keys exposed, per 3Commas’ own incident FAQ) — verify current 2FA + IP-allowlist hygiene before connecting size
BitsgapLeads
Choose Bitsgap if custody matters most
Custody: 4/10 against 2/10 for 3Commas (weight 30)
True cost: 6/10 against 5/10 for 3Commas (weight 26)
Capability: 6/10 against 5/10 for 3Commas (weight 24)
BitsgapScore 63Unified trading terminal with bots and arbitrage scannerStrength: Active multi-exchange tradersWatch-out: Arbitrage opportunities have narrowed materially since 2021 — verify the spread economics work for your size
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Custody
by 2 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Bitsgap leads
3Commas2/10 out of 10
Bitsgap4/10 out of 10
True cost
by 1 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Bitsgap leads
3Commas5/10 out of 10
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
Capability
by 1 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
3Commas5/10 out of 10
Bitsgap6/10 out of 10
Reliability
by 5 of 10weight 4.8 of 86Bitsgap leads
3Commas2/10 out of 10
Bitsgap7/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
3Commas20/20Bitsgap20/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
3Commas8.4/30Bitsgap13.4/30
Bitsgap leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
3Commas2.7/10Bitsgap2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
3Commas6.4/8Bitsgap3.2/8
3Commas leads
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
3Commas6.9/18Bitsgap6.9/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Bitsgap unless the term 3Commas leads on is the one you are buying.
3Commas leads on no published criterion; its edge is trust record (6.4 vs 3.2 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Operational reliability · 20% (3Commas 2/10, Bitsgap 7/10)
Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of operation (26%), Strategy capability (24%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Bitsgap scores 5 points above 3Commas, led by custody, true cost, and capability. Published scores, out of 100: 3Commas 58 (rank 6 of 9 trading bots), Bitsgap 63 (rank 4 of 9).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
