Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Web3 Apps

1inch vs Matcha Same published score.

1inch and Matcha tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them. 1inch is ahead on confidence. 1inch ranks #2 and Matcha #3 of 10 published Web3 apps. The ledger below shows where each side is ahead — pick by the criterion that matters to you.

1inch69
Matcha69
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #2 and #3 of 10
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-1INCH-VS-MATCHA-81bf263e
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Same published score — 69 each

1inch and Matcha tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them. 1inch is ahead on confidence.

1inch #2 of 1069
Matcha #3 of 1069
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by term1inch leads on 1 of 4 published criteria; Matcha on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
Term1inchMatchaWeightPoints
Confidence8/104/105.8+6.0for 1inch+3.1 of 32
Operating style6/109/105.3−4.1for Matcha−2.1 of 32
FrictionScore dimension44.710−1.8for Matcha
Net of the terms+0.1
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread−0.1
Reproduced gap0.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

  • A row-above bound on one row means the criterion arithmetic does not reproduce the displayed gap exactly.
Quick facts

At a glance

2 of 3 rows read the same for both.
Fact1inchMatcha
Swap spreadSnapshot1inch's fee help article and Terms of Use state no swap-fee percentage; its infrastructure-fee FAQ gives a range (last sentence). Its help article "Do I pay fees when using 1inch?" (help.1inch.com, written 5 March 2026, fetched 30 September 2026) names three possible costs. Gas: "In the Swap interface, you usually do not pay gas fees—they are covered by the resolvers who fill your order", but "Swaps involving the Solana network or from native tokens will include gas fees charged to the user", as do Pro-interface (DEX-aggregator) swaps. Swap surplus: positive slippage is kept at "the API-provider level (operated by 1inch Business)". Infrastructure fees: "Certain swaps may include infrastructure fees, which are charged when you use the service"; the taker covers them in the Swap interface and for limit orders, and the user pays them on routes through the DEX aggregator. The 1inch.com Terms of Use (Last updated: 14 September 2026) describe them as "software infrastructure fees charged contemporaneously with your use of the service". No rate is stated on either page. The infrastructure-fee FAQ at business.1inch.com (fetched 30 September 2026) gives the range: "All 1inch interfaces or channels (dApp, Wallet and others using the API) may incur infrastructure fees in the following ranges: 0–5 bps for stable pairs and 0–30 bps for non-stable pairs."Matcha's help article "Are there any fees to make a trade?" (help.matcha.xyz, last updated about a month before the 30 September 2026 fetch) lists: "Matcha Auto 0.25% swap fee for most pairs · No fee for stablecoin-to-stablecoin pairs", with gas built into the quote; Matcha Standard "A flat 25 bps (0.25%) swap fee applies to most pairs, and network gas fees also apply", with no fee between two stablecoins; limit orders "0.02%" for stablecoin pairs and "0.25%" for others; cross-chain swaps "0.04%" stablecoin to stablecoin and "0.40%" for all other pairs, plus gas. The rates apply on every supported chain, Solana included. Matcha may also keep part of any trade surplus and earn order-flow-auction rebates, but "you will never receive less than your quoted amount".
Asset coverageEditorialRoute-aware token swapping across supported EVM and Solana assetsRoute-aware token swapping across supported EVM and Solana assets
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

1inch

69#2 of 10
Pick it when
Pick 1inch if confidence matters most — it scores 8/10 to Matcha's 4/10 there (weight 24).
Strength
Job fit — 8/10
Tradeoff
Less relevant if your actual app life is Solana-native

Matcha

69#3 of 10
Pick it when
Pick Matcha if operating style matters most — it scores 9/10 to 1inch's 6/10 there (weight 22).
Strength
Operating style — 9/10
Tradeoff
Less useful if your actual app life is Solana-native
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

1inch

Choose 1inch if confidence matters most

  • Confidence: 8/10 against 4/10 for Matcha (weight 24)
Matcha

Choose Matcha if operating style matters most

  • Operating style: 9/10 against 6/10 for 1inch (weight 22)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Job fit

weight 7.2 of 86Tie
1inch8 out of 10
Matcha8 out of 10

Ecosystem

weight 5.8 of 86Tie
1inch6 out of 10
Matcha6 out of 10

Operating style

by 3 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Matcha leads
1inch6 out of 10
Matcha9 out of 10

Confidence

by 4 of 10weight 5.8 of 861inch leads
1inch8 out of 10
Matcha4 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86
1inch20/20Matcha20/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
1inch17/30Matcha16.3/30
1inch leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
1inch4/10Matcha4.7/10
Matcha leads
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
1inch5.6/8Matcha5.6/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
1inch6.9/18Matcha6.9/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Same published score — pick by the criterion that matters to you.

Pick 1inch if confidence matters most — it scores 8/10 to Matcha's 4/10 there (weight 24).

Pick Matcha if operating style matters most — it scores 9/10 to 1inch's 6/10 there (weight 22).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
None of this ranking's criteria scores a way of losing money; the families that apply are listed below as not assessed.
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Use-case fit (30%), Ecosystem fit (24%), Operating style (22%), Confidence signal (24%).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

1inch and Matcha tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them. 1inch is ahead on confidence. Published scores, out of 100: 1inch 69 (rank 2 of 10 web3 apps), Matcha 69 (rank 3 of 10).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research