Provider review
Independent provider review with recommendation context.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
What changed: Still strongest where venue compatibility and trading utility matter more than the clearest mainstream trust posture.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
Review story
Why this provider can still be the right call
The short story
Redemption right exercised — 3/10
Why it works
Users who want a stablecoin with stronger exchange-venue utility and broader trading support.
When to step back
Compare the full pool — the measurable record differs more than the marketing does.
Before you act
The few things worth checking before you trust this as your answer
Before you act
Verify venue support, chain version, and your real usage context before using it as a default stablecoin.
What changed
Still strongest where venue compatibility and trading utility matter more than the clearest mainstream trust posture.
Choose something else if
Choose USDC if cleaner issuer trust and practical payment utility matter more than exchange-oriented optionality.
Stablecoins are reviewed on who exactly owes you the dollar and where you rank when they fail (30%), whether the person holding it can get a dollar back at par and whether anyone has at size (28%), what is really behind it and what the third party actually opined on (24%), and who can freeze, burn or replace your balance and whether they have (18%). The counterparty leads because the entity named on the binding terms and the holder's rank in its insolvency are fixed the moment the issuer fails, while a reserve can be restructured overnight and a redemption desk reopened. A licence claim that does not resolve on a public register is an unverified claim, never a licence.
Trust signal
Redemption right exercised — 3/10
Utility signal
Verified 19 August 2026 against the provider's own published sources; read again 29 September 2026.
Usage signal
Tradeoff: That the reserve backing it holds zero US Treasury Bills. TUSD's own assurance report, dated 19 August 2026 and signed by Moore CPA Limited, lists 'US Treasury Bills $0', '$78,900.88' of cash, and $501,850,000 — 99.98% — as a single balance at First Digital Trust Limited, which the same report says 'has invested all or substantially all of the collateral in other instruments to generate yield, which cannot be readily convertible to cash, and are subject to ongoing legal proceedings.' Techteryx has a worldwide freezing order from the DIFC Courts over up to US$456 million and says it has arranged separate 'alternative liquidity' so that tokens 'in public circulation' can still be redeemed — while the same report discloses that 412,585,497.92 of the 494,515,082.75 tokens issued are held by Techteryx itself. A close second: the Terms of Use you agree to name no company at all — 'Company' is defined as 'us', and a search of the full Terms for 'Ltd', 'Limited', 'LLC', 'Inc.' and 'Techteryx' returns zero hits — and those same Terms state that 'the Company does not guarantee any right of redemption or exchange of TrueUSD tokens for US Dollars.'
Continue the decision
Use this review to move, not just read
Review pages should validate the call, then send the visitor back into the strongest next decision path.
When should I use stablecoins instead of other crypto assets?
Stablecoins make the most sense when you want more stable dollar-like value for payments, transfers, savings posture, or onchain use without the same volatility as broader crypto assets.
Are all stablecoins basically the same?
No. They differ on who owes you the dollar and where you rank if that entity fails, on whether redemption at par is a right holders have actually exercised, on what backs them and what the examiner looked at, and on who can freeze or replace your balance.
What matters most when choosing a stablecoin?
Who exactly owes you the dollar and where you rank if they fail, whether a holder can actually redeem at par and whether anyone has at size, what is really behind it and what the third party actually opined on, and who can freeze, burn or replace your balance. The name and the ticker are not on that list.
Related reviews
Other stablecoins reviewed the same way
If something goes wrong with TUSD: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How we review
Recommendation logic is based on fit and tradeoffs before commercial value.
Provider conditions can change after review, so direct verification is still required.
Comparison remains available when the choice is close or context changes.
Referral relationships may exist for some providers, but they do not replace the review standard above. Provider links may include referral attribution when you choose to continue.
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research