Provider at a glance
- Category
- L2 Blockchains
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- taiko.xyz
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 59 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
Taiko Alethia
ZK rollup with Ethereum-equivalent execution
L2BEAT: under review (read 21 October 2026). Scores here stand from ChainChoice’s last full read; the flag is shown, not scored. The source’s page · Rank when first seenL2 Blockchains
#11 Overall
Ranked #11 of 15 L2 blockchains in the published ranking
59
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $0.25 your cost/yr
Is Taiko Alethia right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Proof system10/10, the category best
- Ethereum data availability10/10, the category best
- EVM equivalence10/10, the category best
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Withdrawals if the operator stops0/10 here; zkSync Era scores 5
- Transactions if the sequencer censors you5/10 here; Mantle scores 10
- Maturity & track record4/10 here; zkSync Era scores 6
- Exit window before an upgrade0/10 here; zkSync Era scores 1
- Rollup stage3/10 here; the category best is 7
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: United States, Europe, Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best layer-2 blockchain shows where it lands for you.
What will Taiko Alethia cost you?
$0.25 your cost/yr
- Your transactions a year
- 100
- Median fee per transaction
- $0.0025
$0.07 above the median of 11 priced L2 blockchains.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Taiko Alethia?
- Evidence: verified8 of 8 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- IncidentsNo dated entry in the records read on 1 October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Taiko Alethia
Compare all 4- 9zkSync Era4 points above · stronger on forced withdrawals (5 against 0)63
- 10Mantle3 points above · stronger on censorship resistance (10 against 5)62$0.26
- 12Linea2 points below · stronger on track record (6 against 4)57$1.53
For your setup
Find out if Taiko Alethia fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Taiko Alethia lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best layer-2 blockchainNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Taiko Alethia ranks #11
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (17.4 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 3 of 8.
8 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
1010+3.2010.010#1/15
Primary
Provider page · read 2026-10-01104+1.286.010#11/15
Third party
Third party · read 2026-10-011410+4.4810.010#1/15
Primary
Provider page · read 2026-10-0183+0.773.07#7/15
Third party
Third party · read 2026-10-011810+5.7610.010#1/15
Third party
Third party · read 2026-10-01100+0.000.02#5/15
Third party
Third party · read 2026-10-01180+0.005.010#10/15
Third party
Third party · read 2026-10-01125+1.9210.010#11/15
Third party
Third party · read 2026-10-01Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−3behind Mantle, #10
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 8 criterion scores, the re-run scores 58–60 and stays #11
Evidence8 of 8 scored8 quoted, 8 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Taiko Alethia’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Withdrawals if the operator stops 0 → 3 on its ladder · passes Mantle+363#11 → #10
Transactions if the sequencer censors you 5 → 9 on its ladder · passes Mantle+462#11 → #10
Maturity & track record 4 → 9 on its ladder · passes Mantle+562#11 → #10
Exit window before an upgrade 0 → 5 on its ladder · passes Mantle+562#11 → #10
Ethereum data availability 10 → 7 on its ladder · Linea passes it−356#11 → #12
Proof system 10 → 7 on its ladder · Linea passes it−356#11 → #12
EVM equivalence 10 → 6 on its ladder · Linea passes it−457#11 → #12
Smallest climb: withdrawals if the operator stops 0 → 3 passes Mantle, #10.
Strengths
3 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Proof system — 10/10, the category best
- Ethereum data availability — 10/10, the category best
- EVM equivalence — 10/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Withdrawals if the operator stops — 0/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Transactions if the sequencer censors you — 5/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Maturity & track record — 4/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Exit window before an upgrade — 0/10 against a category best of 2/10
- Rollup stage — 3/10 against a category best of 7/10
Record watch-outs
- Only whitelisted operators can propose blocks, with no permissionless fallback: if they stop, withdrawals freeze (L2BEAT proposer failure: Cannot withdraw)
- Stage 0, and the contracts are instantly upgradable, so there is no window to exit before an upgrade
- Live L2 gas cost is feed-pending — verify current gas before acting; live TVL is shown for context (DefiLlama, dated), never scored
Competitive position
Where Taiko Alethia leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 1514.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#11 / 1513.1 of 30 · best 21.5
Friction#1 / 152.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 153.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 155.5 of 18 · constant here
Where Taiko Alethia leads
- EVM equivalence#1 / 15
- Ethereum data availability#1 / 15
- Proof system#1 / 15
- Exit window before an upgrade#5 / 15
Where it trails
- Maturity & track record#11 / 15
- Transactions if the sequencer censors you#11 / 15
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Linea#12 of 15 · score 57 · 2.0 points behind
Taiko Alethia leads on
- Transactions if the sequencer censors you5 vs 0
Linea leads on
- Maturity & track record6 vs 4
Largest single reason Taiko Alethia is ahead: published criteria (+2.6 display points).Scenario cost: Linea is +$1.28 against Taiko Alethia.
Mantle#10 of 15 · score 62 · 3.0 points ahead
Taiko Alethia leads on
- EVM equivalence10 vs 6
Mantle leads on
- Maturity & track record6 vs 4
- Transactions if the sequencer censors you10 vs 5
Largest single reason Mantle is ahead: published criteria (+2.3 display points).Scenario cost: Mantle is +$0.009 against Taiko Alethia.
zkSync Era#9 of 15 · score 63 · 4.0 points ahead
Taiko Alethia leads on
- EVM equivalence10 vs 6
- Ethereum data availability10 vs 9
zkSync Era leads on
- Maturity & track record6 vs 4
- Exit window before an upgrade1 vs 0
- Withdrawals if the operator stops5 vs 0
Largest single reason zkSync Era is ahead: published criteria (+3.9 display points).Scenario cost: zkSync Era has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
81 vs 59 · gap 22.0Why Arbitrum One ranks above Taiko Alethia
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 22.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisArbitrum OneGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight13.121.5−21.8, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here5.55.5same
Published criterionThisArbitrum OnePoints
Maturity & track record · w10410−1.92, worse
Rollup stage · w837−1.02, worse
Exit window before an upgrade · w1002−0.64, worse
Withdrawals if the operator stops · w18010−5.76, worse
Transactions if the sequencer censors you · w12510−1.92, worse
Net5981−22.0
Your scenario
What Taiko Alethia costs on your scenario
growthepie's median fee per transaction on the chain, the median of the last 7 daily medians, times your transactions, for a year. A median, not a fee schedule: a busy day, a heavy contract call or a deposit or withdrawal through Ethereum costs more. Excludes bridging to and from the chain. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your transactions a year · your input100
Median fee per transaction · published rate$0.0025
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 4 November 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$0.25
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$0.1811 of 15 rows priced · Taiko Alethia +$0.07 vs median
Cheapest priced$0.00043 · Manta PacificTaiko Alethia costs +$0.25 more · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Manta Pacific
4 of 15 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 1 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
8 of 8 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified8 of 8 criteria reconstruct from receipts
8 of 8 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…8 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
8/8 criteria scored, with 8 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #11 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 1 October 2026.
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
EVM equivalencestrength 10 · weight 10Report an errorProvider's own page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Maturity & track recordstrength 4 · weight 10Report an errorThird-party page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Ethereum data availabilitystrength 10 · weight 14Report an errorProvider's own page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Rollup stagestrength 3 · weight 8Report an errorThird-party page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Proof systemstrength 10 · weight 18Report an errorThird-party page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Exit window before an upgradestrength 0 · weight 10Report an errorThird-party page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Withdrawals if the operator stopsstrength 0 · weight 18Report an errorThird-party page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Transactions if the sequencer censors youstrength 5 · weight 12Report an errorThird-party page1 October 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Control failure (Taiko Alethia 0/10): a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.Scored by Exit window before an upgrade · 10%
- Verification failure: an invalid state or transfer is accepted.Scored by Ethereum data availability · 14% (Taiko Alethia 10/10)Scored by Proof system · 18% (Taiko Alethia 10/10)
- Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.Scored by Withdrawals if the operator stops · 18% (Taiko Alethia 0/10)Scored by Transactions if the sequencer censors you · 12% (Taiko Alethia 5/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: EVM equivalence (10%), Maturity & track record (10%), Rollup stage (8%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Rollup: ZK (validity proofs). EVM: equivalent. Mainnet: 2024. DA: Ethereum L1 blobs. Gas in ETH. Stage 0. Live gas feed-pending; TVL shown for context (L2Beat), not scored.L2Beat ↗ · 1 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDL2Beat ↗ · 1 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- unregulated
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- ethereum
- Markets served
- us, europe, global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
Failure record
Incident timeline
Dated events at Taiko Alethia that a verified research record holds, newest first: the record’s own words, the date it gives, the source, and what ChainChoice’s read did where the record links the two.
Reading the incident record for Taiko Alethia.
When an event that meets the extraordinary-review rule is found, the placement is re-read within 72 hours and carries a label until then. The timeline itself never moves a score. How reviews work
If something goes wrong with Taiko Alethia: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 1 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 59, #11 of 15. 8 of 8 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 1 October 2026
2026.10.1Layer-2 chains: an eighth criterion, a fast-exit requirement, and published friction rules- added l2_chains criterion sequencer_failure (12): 10 = forced inclusion through Ethereum within a day or a decentralised sequencer set rated good; 8 = forced inclusion after a longer delay; 5 = an L1 queue or log the sequencer must eventually process but cannot be forced to; 0 = no mechanism. 15 rows quoted from L2BEAT's API, matched by a live re-fetch on the read date (0 differences on any scored entry).
- changed l2_chains weights: proof system 18, withdrawals if the operator stops 18, Ethereum data availability 14, sequencer failure 12, exit window 10, EVM equivalence 10, maturity 10, rollup stage 8 (was 18/18/15/–/6/17/12/14). Three model runs proposed them (withdrawal safety, builder, minimal change) and a fourth, judging the three, set them; its exit window of 8 left the #1 resting on a 1.6-point margin that one one-point move in proof system or proposer failure would overturn, which the brief forbade, so exit window takes the safety lens's 10 and stage, which every lens found double-counted, gives 2.
- changed Published l2_chains order: the #1 does not change (Arbitrum One 81, OP Mainnet 80). Starknet rises from #10 to #8, Mantle from #12 to #10, and Linea falls from #9 to #12 because it has no forced inclusion. No other category moves.
- changed Find my best: "Fast, trust-minimised exit to Ethereum" removes every chain that is not a ZK rollup (structuralFacts.rollupType must be zk) and replaces the +2 for ZK rollups; it also no longer up-weights proof system and exit window, since the filter already decides what those weights leaned towards. The results page lists each removed chain with its reason under "Removed by your requirement", the coverage line and timeline count the removals apart from the country's, and the inputs table shows the answer as a filter (decision layer 1.1.0). The explorer's quick question applies the same requirement and says how many rows it removed. Replaying the 2,217 golden cases, one winner changes: that answer now leads to Scroll.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt l2_chains:taiko-alethia:2026.10.18:e00cba53ba4e
Are you Taiko Alethia? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.