Provider at a glance
- Category
- Retail Staking
- Entity
- All 3 Revolut products
- Official website
- revolut.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 54 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
Revolut ETH Staking
ETH staking inside the Revolut app
Retail Staking
#4 Overall
Ranked #4 of 7 retail staking in the published ranking
54
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $48 commission/yr
Is Revolut ETH Staking right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Share of the ETH reward you keep9/10, the category best
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Way back to ETH3/10 here; Coinbase ETH Staking scores 7
- Rate shown before sign-up6/10 here; Kraken ETH Staking scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: EEA.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best retail staking provider shows where it lands for you.
What will Revolut ETH Staking cost you?
$48 commission/yr
- Your stake
- $32k
- Expected gross yield
- 5%
- Commission on rewards
- 3%
$192 below the median of 5 priced retail staking.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Revolut ETH Staking?
- Evidence: verified3 of 3 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
- On the registersMiCA: authorised, REVOLUT DIGITAL ASSETS EUROPE LTD (CY, since 2025-10-20). Read 3 November 2026. Open the register
Alternatives to Revolut ETH Staking
Compare all 4- 2Kraken ETH Staking2 points above · stronger on rate disclosure (8 against 6)56$400
- 3Coinbase ETH Staking1 point above · stronger on exit path (7 against 3)55$560
- 5OKX ETH Staking3 points below · stronger on exit path (7 against 3)51
For your setup
Find out if Revolut ETH Staking fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Revolut ETH Staking lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best retail staking providerNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Revolut ETH Staking ranks #4
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (21.1 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 3.
3 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
509+14.404.09#1/7Loading evidence…
303+2.885.08#6/7Loading evidence…
206+3.845.08#3/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−1behind Coinbase ETH Staking, #3
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 3 criterion scores, the re-run scores 51–57 and ranks #2–#5
Evidence3 of 3 scored3 quoted, 3 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Revolut ETH Staking’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Share of the ETH reward you keep 9 → 10 on its ladder · passes Coinbase ETH Staking+157#4 → #2
Way back to ETH 3 → 4 on its ladder · passes Coinbase ETH Staking+156#4 → #2
Rate shown before sign-up 6 → 7 on its ladder · passes Coinbase ETH Staking+155#4 → #3
Share of the ETH reward you keep 9 → 8 on its ladder · OKX ETH Staking passes it−151#4 → #5
Way back to ETH 3 → 1 on its ladder · OKX ETH Staking passes it−250#4 → #5
Rate shown before sign-up 6 → 3 on its ladder · OKX ETH Staking passes it−350#4 → #5
Smallest climb: share of the ETH reward you keep 9 → 10 passes Coinbase ETH Staking, #3.
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Share of the ETH reward you keep — 9/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
2 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Way back to ETH — 3/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Rate shown before sign-up — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- The ETH rate is not on Revolut's public page: you see it only after opening an account. In the UK, Revolut's page could not be read from this reader's location on 28 October 2026, so this row is shown only in the EEA, where Revolut Digital Assets Europe holds a MiCA licence.
Competitive position
Where Revolut ETH Staking leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#6 / 76.0 of 20 · best 14.0
Published criteria#2 / 715.8 of 30 · best 17.8
Friction#1 / 72.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 73.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 78.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Revolut ETH Staking leads
- Share of the ETH reward you keep#1 / 7
- Rate shown before sign-up#3 / 7
Where it trails
- Way back to ETH#6 / 7
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Coinbase ETH Staking#3 of 7 · score 55 · 1.0 point ahead
Revolut ETH Staking leads on
- Share of the ETH reward you keep9 vs 3
- Rate shown before sign-up6 vs 5
Coinbase ETH Staking leads on
- Way back to ETH7 vs 3
Largest single reason Coinbase ETH Staking is ahead: availability (+13.0 display points).Scenario cost: Coinbase ETH Staking is +$512 against Revolut ETH Staking.
Kraken ETH Staking#2 of 7 · score 56 · 2.0 points ahead
Revolut ETH Staking leads on
- Share of the ETH reward you keep9 vs 4
Kraken ETH Staking leads on
- Way back to ETH4 vs 3
- Rate shown before sign-up8 vs 6
Largest single reason Kraken ETH Staking is ahead: availability (+13.0 display points).Scenario cost: Kraken ETH Staking is +$352 against Revolut ETH Staking.
OKX ETH Staking#5 of 7 · score 51 · 3.0 points behind
Revolut ETH Staking leads on
- Share of the ETH reward you keep9 vs 2
- Rate shown before sign-up6 vs 5
OKX ETH Staking leads on
- Way back to ETH7 vs 3
Largest single reason Revolut ETH Staking is ahead: published criteria (+15.6 display points).Scenario cost: OKX ETH Staking has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
80 vs 54 · gap 26.0Why Lido (stETH) ranks above Revolut ETH Staking
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 26.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisLido (stETH)Gap share
Availability · 23% weight6.014.0−20.8, worse
Published criteria · 35% weight15.817.8−5.2, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisLido (stETH)Points
Share of the ETH reward you keep · w5098+1.60, better
Way back to ETH · w3038−4.80, worse
Rate shown before sign-up · w2065+0.64, better
Net5480−26.0
Your scenario
What Revolut ETH Staking costs on your scenario
The operator's cut of the rewards your stake earns — not a fee on the stake itself. Gross yield is your assumption, not ours. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
commission/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your stake · your input$32k
Expected gross yield · your input5%
Commission on rewards · published rate3%
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 28 October 2026.
commission/yrCost is stated as commission/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$48
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$2405 of 7 rows priced · Revolut ETH Staking −$192 vs median
Cheapest priced$48 · Revolut ETH StakingRevolut ETH Staking is the cheapest priced row for this scenario · availability not applied — set your country to filter
2 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 28 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
3 of 3 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified3 of 3 criteria reconstruct from receipts
3 of 3 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…3 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
3/3 criteria scored, with 3 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #2 to #5 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 28 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Share of the ETH reward you keepstrength 9 · weight 50Report an error—28 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Way back to ETHstrength 3 · weight 30Report an error—28 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Rate shown before sign-upstrength 6 · weight 20Report an error—28 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Exit failure (Revolut ETH Staking 3/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Way back to ETH · 30%
- Information failure (Revolut ETH Staking 6/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Rate shown before sign-up · 20%
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Share of the ETH reward you keep (50%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Revolut staking page, read 2026-10-28: "Revolut doesn't charge any fees on your staking rewards." and "For some blockchains, a small validator fee of up to 3% of gross staking rewards is deducted on-chain by third-party validators". The 3% used here is the most Revolut says any validator keeps; Revolut's own fee is 0%.Revolut — official page at revolut.com ↗ · 28 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDRevolut — official page at revolut.com ↗ · 28 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- EEA: Revolut Digital Assets (Europe) Ltd, CySEC CASP licence 001/2025 (ESMA register, authorised 20 October 2025). UK: Revolut Ltd, FCA-registered cryptoasset firm, FRN 900562, per Revolut's own footer; its UK staking terms were not readable on 28 October 2026.
- Supported chains
- Ethereum
- Markets served
- eea
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- EEA only here (the region the MiCA licence covers). ESMA's CASP register (repo copy data/esma-casps.json) lists "Revolut Digital Assets (Europe) Ltd", CySEC, authorised 20 October 2025; Revolut's page names it as the provider "licensed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (License No. 001/2025)". The UK page (revolut.com/en-GB/crypto/staking/) redirected to the German page from this reader's location on 28 October 2026, so UK availability and UK fees are unread, not assumed.
Legal entity on file: Revolut, placed in 3 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Revolut ETH Staking: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 28 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 54, #4 of 7. 3 of 3 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 28 October 2026
2026.10.18A new ranking for retail ETH staking: where to stake ETH from an app or an exchange, scored on the share of the reward you keep- added Lido (stETH), Kraken ETH Staking, Coinbase ETH Staking, Revolut ETH Staking, OKX ETH Staking, Bitstamp Earn Staking and Bybit ETH Staking enter Retail Staking, ranked in that order.
- added Lido (stETH) enters first on the Retail Staking country pages for Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States and Vietnam.
- added Retail Staking: seven ETH staking products ranked on the share of the reward kept, the exit routes and the rate disclosure, each read on 28 October 2026 from the provider's own pages, its public API or a regulator's register, with the page captures committed.
- added A rate counts as shown before sign-up only with its basis stated in words: no Lido page says whether its 7-day APR is before or after the 10% fee, so Lido (stETH) scores 5 of 10 there, not the 9 an inference from its API code would give.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt retail_staking:revolut-eth-staking:2026.10.18:b5105e08f7a1
Are you Revolut ETH Staking? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.