Provider at a glance
- Category
- Crypto Offramps
- Official website
- rampnetwork.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 76 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
Ramp Network
Embedded crypto sell widget
Crypto Offramps
#2 Overall
Ranked #2 of 7 crypto offramps in the published ranking
76
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $119 your cost/yr
Is Ramp Network right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- All-in cost of a representative sale8/10; the category best is 9
- Payout rails speed and coverage9/10, the category best
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Spread disclosure and quote binding6/10 here; Kraken scores 8
- Verified licences and regulated footprint7/10 here; Kraken scores 9
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best offramp shows where it lands for you.
What will Ramp Network cost you?
$119 your cost/yr
- Your monthly volume
- $1k
- Sale spread
- 0.99%
Level with the median of 4 priced crypto offramps.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Ramp Network?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Ramp Network
Compare all 4- 1Kraken6 points above · stronger on price transparency (8 against 6)82$96
- 3Coinbase18 points below · stronger on licence depth (8 against 7)58
- 4Transak18 points below · weaker on all in sell cost (4 against 8)58
For your setup
Find out if Ramp Network fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Ramp Network lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best offrampNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Ramp Network ranks #2
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (24.2 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
408+10.244.09#2/7Loading evidence…
256+4.806.08#3/7Loading evidence…
209+5.766.09#1/7Loading evidence…
157+3.367.09#4/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−6behind Kraken, #1
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 73–78 and stays #2
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Ramp Network’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
All-in cost of a representative sale 8 → 0 on its ladder · Coinbase passes it−856#2 → #4
Strengths
2 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- All-in cost of a representative sale — 8/10, category best 9/10
- Payout rails speed and coverage — 9/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
2 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Spread disclosure and quote binding — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Verified licences and regulated footprint — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
Record watch-outs
- The quote is not binding: Ramp states the rate is set when its system processes the payment, not when you hit sell — so on a volatile asset the euros that land can differ from the euros you were shown. Payouts must also go to an account in your own name, which kills business or joint-account cash-outs.
Competitive position
Where Ramp Network leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 714.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#2 / 718.1 of 30 · best 20.5
Friction#1 / 72.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 73.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 79.7 of 18 · pool best
Where Ramp Network leads
- All-in cost of a representative sale#2 / 7
- Spread disclosure and quote binding#3 / 7
- Payout rails speed and coverage#1 / 7
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Kraken#1 of 7 · score 82 · 6.0 points ahead
Ramp Network leads on
- Payout rails speed and coverage9 vs 8
Kraken leads on
- All-in cost of a representative sale9 vs 8
- Spread disclosure and quote binding8 vs 6
- Verified licences and regulated footprint9 vs 7
Largest single reason Kraken is ahead: published criteria (+6.2 display points).Scenario cost: Kraken is −$23 against Ramp Network.
Coinbase#3 of 7 · score 58 · 18.0 points behind
Ramp Network leads on
- All-in cost of a representative sale8 vs 4
- Spread disclosure and quote binding6 vs 3
- Payout rails speed and coverage9 vs 6
Coinbase leads on
- Verified licences and regulated footprint8 vs 7
Largest single reason Ramp Network is ahead: published criteria (+17.4 display points).Scenario cost: Coinbase has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Transak#4 of 7 · score 58 · 18.0 points behind
Ramp Network leads on
- All-in cost of a representative sale8 vs 4
- Payout rails speed and coverage9 vs 4
- Verified licences and regulated footprint7 vs 5
Transak leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Ramp Network is ahead: published criteria (+17.9 display points).Scenario cost: Transak has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
82 vs 76 · gap 6.0Why Kraken ranks above Ramp Network
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 6.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisKrakenGap share
Availability · 23% weight14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight18.120.5−6.2, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight9.79.7same
Published criterionThisKrakenPoints
All-in cost of a representative sale · w4089−1.28, worse
Spread disclosure and quote binding · w2568−1.60, worse
Payout rails speed and coverage · w2098+0.64, better
Verified licences and regulated footprint · w1579−0.96, worse
Net7682−6.0
Your scenario
What Ramp Network costs on your scenario
Sale spread on your volume for a year. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
$1k a month × 12 months × 0.99% sale spread = $119 / year
Your monthly volume · your input$1k
Sale spread · published rate0.99%
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 22 October 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$119
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$1194 of 7 rows priced · Ramp Network at the median
Cheapest priced$96 · KrakenRamp Network costs +$23 more · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Kraken
3 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 22 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #2 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 22 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
All-in cost of a representative salestrength 8 · weight 40Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Spread disclosure and quote bindingstrength 6 · weight 25Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Payout rails speed and coveragestrength 9 · weight 20Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Verified licences and regulated footprintstrength 7 · weight 15Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Regulatory failure (Ramp Network 7/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Verified licences and regulated footprint · 15%
- Execution failure: you get a worse price, later, or nothing.Scored by Spread disclosure and quote binding · 25% (Ramp Network 6/10)Scored by Payout rails speed and coverage · 20% (Ramp Network 9/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Exit failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: All-in cost of a representative sale (40%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Ramp Network help article "What are the fees for selling crypto?" (dated 19 March 2025; read 22 October 2026). Ramp Network's fee is "Our margin + cost of payout method". Fee / minimum by payout method: ACH bank transfer "0.99%" / "$1.99"; RTP bank transfer "0.99%" / "$1.99"; SEPA bank transfer "0.99%" / "€1.99"; SEPA Instant bank transfer "0.99%" / "€1.99"; SPEI bank transfer "2.9%" / "$1"; Payout-to-card (Mastercard) "4.49%" / "€1.99"; Payout-to-card (Visa) "4.49%" / "€1.99". Network fees are paid by the seller on top. Same page: "the amount you receive from selling crypto is determined by the exchange rate when the payment is processed by our system , not when you initiate the sale." No spread over a benchmark is published.Ramp Network — official pricing page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDRamp Network — official pricing page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Licences held
- United Kingdom: Registration / authorisation, United States: Registration / authorisation
- Compliance level
- full
- Regulatory note
- Ramp Swaps Ltd — FCA, registered cryptoasset firm (fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat), FRN 928783. Ramp Swaps LLC — FinCEN, registered MSB, 31000287566749. Ramp Swaps LLC — state MTLs: Alabama 921, Alaska AKMT-17392, Arkansas 135571, Maryland/New Mexico/Oregon NMLS 2366547, Ohio OHMT 282, North Dakota MT105119, Kentucky SC885335.
- Supported chains
- Not published
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Ramp Network Terms of Service ("Last updated 24th September 2026", read 22 October 2026): "The Services are not available where prohibited by law or by Ramp Network policy, as updated from time to time; currently, such places include, but are not necessarily limited to, the countries of Iran, North Korea, Sudan, South Sudan, Syria, Cuba, Russia, or any other country against which the United States, the United Kingdom or the European Union imposes financial sanctions or embargoes." Payout rails (help articles 8967 and 8992, read 22 October 2026): ACH and RTP in the "USA ( supported states )"; SEPA and SEPA Instant in the UK, EEA, Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, Switzerland and Vatican; SPEI in Mexico; Visa card payouts "Global (except the USA)"; "Payouts must be sent to a bank account or card owned by, and under the same name as, the user who makes the sale."
Legal entity on file: Ramp Network, placed in 2 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Ramp Network: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 22 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 76, #2 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.7Forty-one more products are offered only where their own quoted terms serve- fixed 141 country exclusions on 31 rows, each the name of a country the row's own quoted terms exclude: for example Mercuryo Hungary, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia and Morocco; Gemini Custody the United Kingdom, Australia and the EU after its wind-down; Backed xStocks the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Nigeria, the Philippines and Venezuela.
- changed Thirteen rows list the only countries their terms serve: Coins.ph the Philippines, Spritz bill pay, Brex, Unchained, WisdomTree, Franklin BENJI and AnchorWatch the United States (with its territories for AnchorWatch), PRYPCO Mint the UAE, N26 crypto seven EU countries, Gemini Tokenized Stocks the EU, XNET the US, Canada and the UK, Coldbit Steel and MetaMask Card the countries they list.
- changed Published (no-country) orders do not move. Country results change: in India six categories each lose one row (bill pay, cards, off-ramps, P2P, seed backup, tokenised real estate), and bill pay there has no row confirmed available, so it shows the published order marked as such; country pages list 23 fewer rows (24,357 to 24,334). The grounding test now matches full country names in any case, which shows seven earlier exclusions were quoted all along: the named debt of unquoted exclusions falls from 40 to 33 pairs.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt offramps:ramp_network_offramp:2026.10.18:e7aeff96beb3
Are you Ramp Network? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.