Skip to main content
Organisation

Phantom

2 placements on ChainChoice under Phantom, each scored against its own category's pool and criteria — none currently #1. The placements are not averaged and not ranked against each other: a #1 exchange and a #6 crypto card are two different products in two different markets.

Transaction Simulation
Phantom
Rank#4 OverallScore66

#1 in this category: MetaMask Transaction Shield

View verdict
Wallets
Phantom
Rank#4 OverallScore78

#1 in this category: Rabby Wallet

View verdict
Transaction Simulation
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Execution failure (Phantom 3/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
    Scored by Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses · 25%
  • Exit failure (Phantom 7/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
    Scored by Vendor survival and continuity risk · 25%
  • Information failure (Phantom 6/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
    Scored by Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence · 30%
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Published price and true total cost (20%).
Wallets
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Can I export my own keys and use them elsewhere? · 28% (Phantom 8/10)
    Scored by Can I see exactly what I am signing? · 30% (Phantom 7/10)
    Scored by What has gone wrong, and did they publish it? · 24% (Phantom 8/10)
    Scored by If I lose my device, how do I get back in? · 18% (Phantom 7/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.