Provider at a glance
- Category
- SocialFi
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- paragraph.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 41 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Paragraph
Publishing and newsletter platform
SocialFi
#8 Overall
Ranked #8 of 8 SocialFi in the published ranking
41
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Paragraph right for you?
Look elsewhere if these come first
- If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine?1/10 here; Farcaster scores 7
- Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to?4/10 here; Farcaster scores 8
- Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down?1/10 here; Zora scores 6
- Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it?2/10 here; Farcaster scores 5
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best SocialFi platform shows where it lands for you.
What will Paragraph cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Your monthly volume
- $1k
How safe is Paragraph?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Paragraph
Compare all 4- 5Farcaster27 points above · stronger on handle and graph custody (7 against 1)68
- 6Towns Protocol13 points above · stronger on handle and graph custody (6 against 1)54
- 7Zora4 points above · stronger on earnings waterfall (6 against 1)45
For your setup
Find out if Paragraph fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Paragraph lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best SocialFi platformNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Paragraph ranks #8
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (6.3 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
321+1.026.510#7/8Loading evidence…
274+3.467.09#6/8Loading evidence…
251+0.805.59#8/8Loading evidence…
162+1.024.010#7/8Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−4behind Zora, #7
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 41–42 and stays #8
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Paragraph’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine? 1 → 4 on its ladder · passes Zora+346#8 → #7
Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to? 4 → 8 on its ladder · passes Zora+446#8 → #7
Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down? 1 → 5 on its ladder · passes Zora+446#8 → #7
Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it? 2 → 8 on its ladder · passes Zora+646#8 → #7
Smallest climb: “If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine?” 1 → 4 passes Zora, #7.
Strengths
0 from the score dataWhere it leads
No scored criterion is at or within one point of the category best, so no strength can be stated from the data.
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine? — 1/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to? — 4/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down? — 1/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it? — 2/10 against a category best of 10/10
Record watch-outs
- You would be buying the ownership promise and discovering it is a mailing list. Paragraph says 'your writing and your audience belong to you' and backs it with a subscriber export that three first-party statements put on every plan and its plans page withholds from Free — but what walks out is a CSV whose only required column is an email address. The handle, the site, the archive URLs, the follow graph and the post coins all stay behind, because the authoritative record is a row in Paragraph's database reachable only through Paragraph's API, and the 187,823-byte documentation corpus at https://docs.paragraph.com/llms-full.txt contained the word 'onchain' zero times on 2026-09-28. The sharper annoyance is the money: coins are live, Paragraph concedes in its own launch post that it takes a 'transaction rev share' and that it is considering 'increasing' it, and the documentation link it publishes for the rate — https://docs.paragraph.com/docs/coins — returns 404. You can find out what you pay Paragraph to the dollar and cannot find out what Paragraph takes from you at any price.
Competitive position
Where Paragraph leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 814.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#8 / 84.7 of 30 · best 21.0
Friction#1 / 82.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 83.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 88.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Paragraph leadsNo criterion in the top third of its pool.
Where it trails
- If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine?#7 / 8
- Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to?#6 / 8
- Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down?#8 / 8
- Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it?#7 / 8
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Zora#7 of 8 · score 45 · 4.0 points ahead
Paragraph leads on
- Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to?4 vs 2
Zora leads on
- Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down?6 vs 1
- Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it?3 vs 2
Largest single reason Zora is ahead: published criteria (+5.5 display points).Scenario cost: Zora has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Towns Protocol#6 of 8 · score 54 · 13.0 points ahead
Paragraph leads on
- Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to?4 vs 3
Towns Protocol leads on
- If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine?6 vs 1
- Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down?4 vs 1
- Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it?3 vs 2
Largest single reason Towns Protocol is ahead: published criteria (+14.0 display points).Scenario cost: Towns Protocol has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Farcaster#5 of 8 · score 68 · 27.0 points ahead
Paragraph leads onNo scored criterion
Farcaster leads on
- If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine?7 vs 1
- Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to?8 vs 4
- Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down?5 vs 1
Largest single reason Farcaster is ahead: published criteria (+28.1 display points).Scenario cost: Farcaster has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
82 vs 41 · gap 41.0Why Nostr ranks above Paragraph
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale; a floor bound on one of the rows keeps the reproduced gap (42.4) from matching the displayed one exactly, which is stated rather than hidden.
DimensionThisNostrGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight4.721.0−42.4, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisNostrPoints
If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine? · w32110−9.22, worse
Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to? · w2749−4.32, worse
Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down? · w2516−4.00, worse
Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it? · w16210−4.10, worse
Net4182−41.0≈
Your scenario
Paragraph is not priced for this scenario
Marketplace fee on your volume for a year. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your monthly volume · your input$1k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 28 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory medianNot priced0 of 8 rows priced
Cheapest pricedNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
8 of 8 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 28 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #8 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 28 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine?strength 1 · weight 32Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to?strength 4 · weight 27Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down?strength 1 · weight 25Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it?strength 2 · weight 16Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Control failure (Paragraph 2/10): a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.Scored by Whose key can override mine — and what exactly can they do with it? · 16%
- Custody failure (Paragraph 1/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.Scored by If this company shuts down tomorrow, is my handle and my follower list still mine? · 32%
- Exit failure (Paragraph 4/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Can I actually walk out with my audience — and is there anywhere to walk to? · 27%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Who takes a cut of what I earn here, and is the number actually written down? (25%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- WHAT THE CREATOR PAYS PARAGRAPH, from https://
docs .paragraph .com /account /plans-and-credits .md (HTTP 200, fetched 28 September 2026): "Paragraph has four plans you can pick yourself, plus a custom Enterprise plan." Table "Plans at a glance" (Plan / Monthly / Annual / Credits per month): Free "$0" / "$0" / "500"; Starter "$20" / "$16/mo billed annually ($192/yr)" / "1,500"; Growth "$100" / "$80/mo billed annually ($960/yr)" / "8,500"; Scale "$200" / "$160/mo billed annually ($1,920/yr)" / "17,500"; Enterprise "Custom". "Annual billing saves 20% on every paid plan." NEW ON THIS PAGE SINCE AUGUST: the export of the subscriber list is priced. The same page answers "Can I export my subscribers?" with "Yes, on every paid plan. Starter and above can download the full list as a CSV from your subscribers page. Free doesn't include the export, but your subscribers are still yours, so upgrading for a month is enough to take the list with you." - while https:// docs .paragraph .com /account /manage-account .md and https:// docs .paragraph .com /audience /subscribers .md (both fetched 28 September 2026) still say the export is available on any plan. The same plans page also answers a second question with "Yes, at any time, on any plan. Your subscriber list is exportable whenever you want it.", so it contradicts itself. The marketing page https:// paragraph .com /pricing (HTTP 200, fetched 28 September 2026) renders the annual figures by default: "$16" with "$192 billed yearly" and "Save $48 (20%)", "$80" with "$960 billed yearly", "$160" with "$1,920 billed yearly"; the "2 months free with annual billing" line the August note quoted is gone. NOTE THE GAP: these are prices the CREATOR PAYS. Neither page publishes any creator take rate on coins or reader payments - see earnings_waterfall.Paragraph — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDParagraph — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Base
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- NEITHER A REGIONAL FOOTPRINT NOR THE STANDARD SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION — and the absence of the second is itself unusual. https://
paragraph .com /terms-of-use was read in full (HTTP 200, 17 August 2026, 20 sections) and searched for 'OFAC', 'sanction', 'embargo', 'export control', 'country', 'countries', 'region' and 'resident': ZERO hits on every one. Most crypto ToS in this catalogue carry an OFAC/sanctions eligibility rep; Paragraph's does not, which is consistent with a product that has repositioned away from crypto. The only eligibility gate published is age: 'You must be at least 16 years old and legally able to enter into this agreement. If the law where you live requires you to be older, you must meet that age requirement.' That is an age rule applying everywhere, not a market restriction. The only geographic language of any kind is forum selection, which binds the dispute venue and not the user's market: 'These Terms are governed by applicable federal law and the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict-of-law principles.' and 'Any dispute arising from or relating to these Terms or the Services will be finally settled by individual arbitration in San Francisco County, California, under the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect.' Nothing restricts the product to a market. Classified 'global'.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Paragraph: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 28 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 41, #8 of 8. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt socialfi:paragraph:2026.10.18:4f61424dedef
Are you Paragraph? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.