Provider at a glance
- Category
- Wallet Screening
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- misttrack.io
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 64 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in November 2026.
MistTrack (SlowMist)
AML tracking from SlowMist
Wallet Screening
#4 Overall
Ranked #4 of 9 wallet screening in the published ranking
64
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $20 your cost/yr
Is MistTrack (SlowMist) right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Access & price transparency10/10, the category best
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Attribution defensibility3/10 here; Crystal Intelligence scores 6
- False-positive posture & appeal path2/10 here; Crystal Intelligence scores 4
- Coverage for your stack4/10 here; Crystal Intelligence scores 7
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best wallet screening tool shows where it lands for you.
What will MistTrack (SlowMist) cost you?
$20 your cost/yr
- Transactions per year
- 1k
- Annual price
- $20
- Monthly price
- $229
How safe is MistTrack (SlowMist)?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read November 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to MistTrack (SlowMist)
Compare all 4- 5Scorechain2 points below · stronger on attribution (4 against 3)62
- 6Crystal Intelligence2 points below · stronger on attribution (6 against 3)62
- 7Merkle Science8 points below · stronger on false positive (4 against 2)56
For your setup
Find out if MistTrack (SlowMist) fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where MistTrack (SlowMist) lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best wallet screening toolNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why MistTrack (SlowMist) ranks #4
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (14.0 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
303+2.884.09#6/9Loading evidence…
262+1.664.06#7/9Loading evidence…
244+3.074.09#5/9Loading evidence…
2010+6.403.010#1/9Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−14behind Elliptic, #3
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 62–66 and stays #4
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of MistTrack (SlowMist)’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Attribution defensibility 3 → 1 on its ladder · Scorechain passes it−260#4 → #6
False-positive posture & appeal path 2 → 0 on its ladder · Scorechain passes it−261#4 → #6
Coverage for your stack 4 → 2 on its ladder · Scorechain passes it−261#4 → #6
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Access & price transparency — 10/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Attribution defensibility — 3/10 against a category best of 9/10
- False-positive posture & appeal path — 2/10 against a category best of 6/10
- Coverage for your stack — 4/10 against a category best of 9/10
Record watch-outs
- Jurisdiction and coverage, in that order. A China/Hong-Kong-origin AML vendor creates data-residency, procurement and geopolitical-diligence problems…
- The most open access in the category alongside Scorechain AI.
- No breach, enforcement action, wind-down or regional exit found against MistTrack or SlowMist.
Competitive position
Where MistTrack (SlowMist) leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 920.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#5 / 910.5 of 30 · best 15.6
Friction#4 / 91.3 of 10 · best 2.7
Trust record#4 / 94.8 of 8 · best 5.6
Measured data#1 / 98.3 of 18 · constant here
Where MistTrack (SlowMist) leads
- Access & price transparency#1 / 9
Where it trails
- False-positive posture & appeal path#7 / 9
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Scorechain#5 of 9 · score 62 · 2.0 points behind
MistTrack (SlowMist) leads on
- Access & price transparency10 vs 8
Scorechain leads on
- Attribution defensibility4 vs 3
Largest single reason MistTrack (SlowMist) is ahead: friction (+1.6 display points).Scenario cost: Scorechain has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Crystal Intelligence#6 of 9 · score 62 · 2.0 points behind
MistTrack (SlowMist) leads on
- Access & price transparency10 vs 2
Crystal Intelligence leads on
- Attribution defensibility6 vs 3
- False-positive posture & appeal path4 vs 2
- Coverage for your stack7 vs 4
Largest single reason MistTrack (SlowMist) is ahead: trust record (+4.2 display points).Scenario cost: Crystal Intelligence has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Merkle Science#7 of 9 · score 56 · 8.0 points behind
MistTrack (SlowMist) leads on
- Access & price transparency10 vs 2
Merkle Science leads on
- False-positive posture & appeal path4 vs 2
Largest single reason MistTrack (SlowMist) is ahead: published criteria (+6.8 display points).Scenario cost: Merkle Science has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
83 vs 64 · gap 19.0Why TRM Labs ranks above MistTrack (SlowMist)
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 19.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisTRM LabsGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here20.020.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight10.515.6−13.3, worse
Friction · 12% weight1.32.7−3.6, worse
Trust record · 9% weight4.85.6−2.1, worse
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisTRM LabsPoints
Attribution defensibility · w3038−4.80, worse
False-positive posture & appeal path · w2626−3.33, worse
Coverage for your stack · w2449−3.84, worse
Access & price transparency · w20102+5.12, better
Net6483−19.0
Your scenario
What MistTrack (SlowMist) costs on your scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Annual price · published rate$20
Monthly price · published rate$229
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 3 November 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$20
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median and cheapestNot statedOnly 2 of 9 rows publish a comparable price; a median and a cheapest row need at least 3.
7 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 3 November 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #4 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Attribution defensibilitystrength 3 · weight 30Report an error—3 November 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.False-positive posture & appeal pathstrength 2 · weight 26Report an error—3 November 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Coverage for your stackstrength 4 · weight 24Report an error—3 November 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Access & price transparencystrength 10 · weight 20Report an error—3 November 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Attribution defensibility · 30% (MistTrack (SlowMist) 3/10)Scored by False-positive posture & appeal path · 26% (MistTrack (SlowMist) 2/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Coverage for your stack (24%), Access & price transparency (20%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- MistTrack's pricing page (misttrack.io/pricing.html), read 3 November 2026, publishes a price for every MistTrack plan (Scorechain AI also publishes credit-pack prices; the separate SlowMist KYT engine is not priced): Basic "$229 / month" ("Try Free for 7 Days"), Standard "$689 / month", Compliance "$2069 / month". The Developer plan is "From $20 / Year", usage-tiered: "1 $20 100 API calls $0.2 2 $100 500 API calls $0.2 3 $150 1,000 API calls $0.15 4 $1,000 10,000 API calls $0.1 5 $5,000 100,000 API calls $0.05 6 $10,000 250,000 API calls $0.04 7 $30,000 1,000,000 API calls $0.03 Validity: 1 year, Rate limit: 10 requests/second." A 48-hour Standard trial: "Try Standard Plan for $10 for 48 hours", "only once per user". Refunds: "Payments made are non-refundable and we do not provide refunds for any services already paid for." Re-read 3 November 2026.MistTrack (SlowMist) — verified source ↗ · 3 November 2026
- Prices published in
- USDMistTrack (SlowMist) — verified source ↗ · 3 November 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Multi-chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Global
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- The most open access in the category alongside Scorechain AI.
- Availability note
- The most open access in the category alongside Scorechain AI: every plan is bought online and MistTrack Light is free. MistTrack's Terms of Use (misttrack.io/terms-of-use.html, "Last Updated: October 9, 2026"), read 3 November 2026, name no restricted country; for commercial use of the API and data they state: "MistTrack reserves the right to review the proposed commercial use based on the customer's business model, actual use case, jurisdiction, data usage, end-customer profile, and other relevant risk factors, and may request additional information where necessary."
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with MistTrack (SlowMist): where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
10 methodology entries
- 3 November 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 64, #4 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt wallet_screening:misttrack:2026.10.18:8a4a1bd0c003
Are you MistTrack (SlowMist)? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.