Provider at a glance
- Category
- Transaction Simulation
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- gopluslabs.io
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 65 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
GoPlus Security
Token and address risk API
Transaction Simulation
#5 Overall
Ranked #5 of 9 transaction simulation in the published ranking
65
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $0.00 your cost/yr
Is GoPlus Security right for you?
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence6/10 here; Rabby Wallet scores 7
- Vendor survival and continuity risk6/10 here; Phantom scores 7
- Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses3/10 here; Kerberus (Pocket Universe) scores 5
- Published price and true total cost7/10 here; Rabby Wallet scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best simulation tool shows where it lands for you.
What will GoPlus Security cost you?
$0.00 your cost/yr
- Transactions per year
- 1k
- Monthly price
- $0
Level with the median of 4 priced transaction simulation.
How this is calculatedHow safe is GoPlus Security?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to GoPlus Security
Compare all 4- 3Rabby Wallet4 points above · stronger on detection method (7 against 6)69
- 4Phantom1 point above · stronger on survival risk (7 against 6)66
- 6Kerberus (Pocket Universe)3 points below · stronger on accountability (5 against 3)62
For your setup
Find out if GoPlus Security fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where GoPlus Security lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best simulation toolNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why GoPlus Security ranks #5
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (17.4 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
306+5.766.09#4/9Loading evidence…
256+4.806.08#5/9Loading evidence…
253+2.403.07#5/9Loading evidence…
207+4.486.09#3/9Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−1behind Phantom, #4
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 64–67 and ranks #4–#5
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of GoPlus Security’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence 6 → 7 on its ladder · passes Phantom+167#5 → #4
Vendor survival and continuity risk 6 → 7 on its ladder · passes Phantom+167#5 → #4
Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses 3 → 4 on its ladder · passes Phantom+167#5 → #4
Published price and true total cost 7 → 8 on its ladder · passes Phantom+167#5 → #4
Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence 6 → 4 on its ladder · Kerberus (Pocket Universe) passes it−262#5 → #6
Vendor survival and continuity risk 6 → 3 on its ladder · Kerberus (Pocket Universe) passes it−361#5 → #6
Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses 3 → 0 on its ladder · Kerberus (Pocket Universe) passes it−361#5 → #6
Smallest climb: simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence 6 → 7 passes Phantom, #4.
Strengths
0 from the score dataWhere it leads
No scored criterion is at or within one point of the category best, so no strength can be stated from the data.
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence — 6/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Vendor survival and continuity risk — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses — 3/10 against a category best of 7/10
- Published price and true total cost — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
Record watch-outs
- Free means 150K CU a month at 150 CU per minute — enough to evaluate, not enough to run a wallet. Production throughput starts at the $199/month Test Package and an SLA only from Growth at $799/month, and because the CU cost of a transaction-simulation call is not published you cannot turn the ladder into a price per simulation before you integrate. GoPlus's own docs support page still says the API "is free, and the rate limit is 30 calls/minute", which contradicts the price table.
- GoPlus publishes a complete, self-serve, seven-row price ladder on its own marketing site — an earlier model run searched only docs.gopluslabs.io and missed gopluslabs.io itself. Verbatim table: Free Version (Free / 150K CU per month / 30k CU-day / 150 CU-min), Test Package $199/month (6M CU), Beginner Package $399/month (16M CU), Growth Package $799/month (37.5M CU, 99.5% SLA), Pro Package $1,899/month (150M CU, 99.9% SLA), Ultra Package $3,499/month (375M CU, 99.95% SLA), Enterprise Edition "Contact us" (99.99% SLA). GoPlus is in fact the second-most price-transparent vendor in the pool after MetaMask — a buyer can size and budget the product to production throughput without a sales call, which is the exact opposite of what the current evidence string asserts. Read again 14 September 2026: the table is unchanged and the pricing source now points to gopluslabs.io/en/security-api.
Competitive position
Where GoPlus Security leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 914.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#5 / 913.1 of 30 · best 19.1
Friction#1 / 92.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 93.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 98.3 of 18 · constant here
Where GoPlus Security leads
- Published price and true total cost#3 / 9
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Phantom#4 of 9 · score 66 · 1.0 point ahead
GoPlus Security leads on
- Published price and true total cost7 vs 6
Phantom leads on
- Vendor survival and continuity risk7 vs 6
Largest single reason Phantom is ahead: published criteria (+0.3 display points).Scenario cost: Phantom has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Kerberus (Pocket Universe)#6 of 9 · score 62 · 3.0 points behind
GoPlus Security leads on
- Vendor survival and continuity risk6 vs 5
- Published price and true total cost7 vs 3
Kerberus (Pocket Universe) leads on
- Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses5 vs 3
Largest single reason GoPlus Security is ahead: published criteria (+3.4 display points).Scenario cost: Kerberus (Pocket Universe) has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Rabby Wallet#3 of 9 · score 69 · 4.0 points ahead
GoPlus Security leads onNo scored criterion
Rabby Wallet leads on
- Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence7 vs 6
- Published price and true total cost8 vs 7
Largest single reason Rabby Wallet is ahead: published criteria (+3.1 display points).Scenario cost: Rabby Wallet has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
81 vs 65 · gap 16.0Why MetaMask Transaction Shield ranks above GoPlus Security
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 16.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisMetaMask Transaction ShieldGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight13.119.1−15.6, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisMetaMask Transaction ShieldPoints
Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence · w3068−1.92, worse
Vendor survival and continuity risk · w2568−1.60, worse
Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses · w2537−3.20, worse
Published price and true total cost · w2079−1.28, worse
Net6581−16.0
Your scenario
What GoPlus Security costs on your scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Monthly price · published rate$0
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 22 October 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$0.00
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$0.004 of 9 rows priced · GoPlus Security at the median
Cheapest priced$0.00 · GoPlus SecurityGoPlus Security is the cheapest priced row for this scenario · availability not applied — set your country to filter
5 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 22 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #4 to #5 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 22 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependencestrength 6 · weight 30Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Vendor survival and continuity riskstrength 6 · weight 25Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Verifiable performance and what happens when it missesstrength 3 · weight 25Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Published price and true total coststrength 7 · weight 20Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Execution failure (GoPlus Security 3/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.Scored by Verifiable performance and what happens when it misses · 25%
- Exit failure (GoPlus Security 6/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Vendor survival and continuity risk · 25%
- Information failure (GoPlus Security 6/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Simulation depth vs. blocklist dependence · 30%
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Published price and true total cost (20%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Published self-serve ladder on gopluslabs.io/en/security-api (read 22 October 2026): Free Version "Free", 150K CU/month (30k CU/day, 150 CU/min); Test Package "$199/month" (6M CU); Beginner Package "$399/month" (16M CU); Growth Package "$799/month" (37.5M CU, 99.5% SLA); Pro Package "$1,899/month" (150M CU, 99.9% SLA); Ultra Package "$3,499/month" (375M CU, 99.95% SLA); Enterprise Edition "Please contact us" (99.99% SLA). The lowest public tier therefore costs 0 USD a month. The same page conflicts on batch calls (table: from Test Package up; Q&A: "only for Pro, Ultra or Enterprise Packages"). The CU cost of a transaction-simulation call is not stated on the pricing table or the simulation API doc.GoPlus Security — official pricing page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDGoPlus Security — official pricing page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Multi-chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Self-serve developer API, sold worldwide. GoPlus's API License Agreement (docs.gopluslabs.io/reference/api-license-agreement-new, read 22 October 2026) names no restricted country or sanctions list; its only jurisdiction clause is governing law: "This agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York". The site footer reads "Registered under MiCAR".
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with GoPlus Security: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
10 methodology entries
- 22 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 65, #5 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt transaction_simulation:goplus:2026.10.18:e0a7c268e338
Are you GoPlus Security? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.