Provider at a glance
- Category
- Travel Rule Compliance
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- docs.codevasp.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 81 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
CodeVASP (CODE)
Korean Travel Rule network
Travel Rule Compliance
#1 Overall
Ranked #1 of 9 travel rule compliance in the published ranking
81
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is CodeVASP (CODE) right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Documented protocol reach and routing8/10; the category best is 9
- Failure, decline and timeout paths8/10; the category best is 9
- Unhosted-wallet control, as documented8/10; the category best is 9
Look elsewhere if these come first
- PII custody and testable go-live8/10 here; the category best is 10
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best travel rule tool shows where it lands for you.
What will CodeVASP (CODE) cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Transactions per year
- 1k
How safe is CodeVASP (CODE)?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to CodeVASP (CODE)
Compare all 4- 221 Analytics — 21 Travel RuleLevel on score · stronger on protocol reach (9 against 8)81
- 3Notabene TransactLevel on score · stronger on failure paths (9 against 8)81
- 4Sumsub Travel Rule1 point below · stronger on failure paths (9 against 8)80
For your setup
Find out if CodeVASP (CODE) fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where CodeVASP (CODE) lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best travel rule toolNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why it leads
Why CodeVASP (CODE) ranks #1
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (25.6 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
308+7.687.09#2/9Loading evidence…
288+7.178.09#3/9Loading evidence…
248+6.147.09#3/9Loading evidence…
188+4.618.010#2/9Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
MarginLevelover 21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule, #2
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 79–81 and ranks #1–#4
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of CodeVASP (CODE)’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Documented protocol reach and routing 8 → 7 on its ladder · 21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule passes it−179#1 → #4
Failure, decline and timeout paths 8 → 7 on its ladder · 21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule passes it−179#1 → #4
Unhosted-wallet control, as documented 8 → 7 on its ladder · 21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule passes it−179#1 → #4
Strengths
3 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Documented protocol reach and routing — 8/10, category best 9/10
- Failure, decline and timeout paths — 8/10, category best 9/10
- Unhosted-wallet control, as documented — 8/10, category best 9/10
Tradeoffs
1 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- PII custody and testable go-live — 8/10 against a category best of 10/10
Record watch-outs
- Technical integration does not buy reach: "Completing the API integration process with CodeVASP does not automatically enable transactions with all member VASPs.", each then running its own AML/CFT and readiness review (01-Integration-Process). Of the three solutions 12-Interoperability names, a note confines one to Korea: "Exchanges integrated with the VerifyVASP solution support only domestic transactions within South Korea, transactions with exchanges outside Korea are not possible." The counterparty list sits on a dashboard that "can only be joined by an invitation" (01-Dev-Environment-Setup), and the 63 English pages in the /en/docs navigation carry no price (read 2026-09-04).
Competitive position
Where CodeVASP (CODE) leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 914.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#2 / 919.2 of 30 · best 20.4
Friction#1 / 92.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 93.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 98.3 of 18 · pool best
Where CodeVASP (CODE) leads
- Documented protocol reach and routing#2 / 9
- Failure, decline and timeout paths#3 / 9
- Unhosted-wallet control, as documented#3 / 9
- PII custody and testable go-live#2 / 9
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule#2 of 9 · score 81 · same score
CodeVASP (CODE) leads on
- Failure, decline and timeout paths8 vs 6
21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule leads on
- Documented protocol reach and routing9 vs 8
- Unhosted-wallet control, as documented9 vs 8
Scenario cost: 21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Notabene Transact#3 of 9 · score 81 · same score
CodeVASP (CODE) leads on
- Documented protocol reach and routing8 vs 7
Notabene Transact leads on
- Failure, decline and timeout paths9 vs 8
Scenario cost: Notabene Transact has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Sumsub Travel Rule#4 of 9 · score 80 · 1.0 point behind
CodeVASP (CODE) leads onNo scored criterion
Sumsub Travel Rule leads on
- Failure, decline and timeout paths9 vs 8
- Unhosted-wallet control, as documented9 vs 8
Largest single reason CodeVASP (CODE) is ahead: measured data (+3.6 display points).Scenario cost: Sumsub Travel Rule has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against #2
81 vs 81 · gap 0.0Why CodeVASP (CODE) ranks above 21 Analytics — 21 Travel Rule
DimensionThis21 Analytics — 21 Travel RuleGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight19.219.2same
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight8.38.3same
Published criterionThis21 Analytics — 21 Travel RulePoints
Documented protocol reach and routing · w3089−0.96, worse
Failure, decline and timeout paths · w2886+1.79, better
Unhosted-wallet control, as documented · w2489−0.77, worse
Net81810
Your scenario
CodeVASP (CODE) is not priced for this scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 30 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory medianNot priced0 of 9 rows priced
Cheapest pricedNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
9 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 30 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #1 to #4 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 30 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Documented protocol reach and routingstrength 8 · weight 30Report an error—30 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Failure, decline and timeout pathsstrength 8 · weight 28Report an error—30 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Unhosted-wallet control, as documentedstrength 8 · weight 24Report an error—30 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.PII custody and testable go-livestrength 8 · weight 18Report an error—30 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Regulatory failure (CodeVASP (CODE) 8/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Unhosted-wallet control, as documented · 24%
- Execution failure (CodeVASP (CODE) 8/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.Scored by Failure, decline and timeout paths · 28%
- Information failure (CodeVASP (CODE) 8/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by PII custody and testable go-live · 18%
Not assessed by this ranking: Liveness failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Documented protocol reach and routing (30%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- No price is published. www.codevasp.com/en/contact is a "Request a Demo" form ("Fill out the form below to learn how CodeVASP can help your business stay compliant."), not a price list; https://
www .codevasp .com /en /pricing returns HTTP 404 and the site nav has no pricing entry; none of the 62 English pages in the docs.codevasp.com/en/docs navigation states a CodeVASP fee — their price and currency fields describe the transfer payload, not a charge (all read 30 September 2026).CodeVASP (CODE) — official pricing page ↗ · 30 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDCodeVASP (CODE) — official pricing page ↗ · 30 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- The vendor's own network is documented end to end, and 12-Interoperability-with-Other-Protocols names three solutions: "Currently, CodeVASP is integrated with solutions such as Verify VASP, GTR, and Sygna, providing a wide-ranging network."
- Supported chains
- Ethereum, Arbitrum One, Base, Kaia, Polygon, Solana, BNB Smart Chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with CodeVASP (CODE): where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 30 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 81, #1 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt travel_rule_compliance:codevasp:2026.10.18:d9abf9dc5ec5
Are you CodeVASP (CODE)? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.