Bitstamp

Crypto exchange owned by Robinhood

Exchanges

#2 Overall

Ranked #2 of 17 exchanges in the published ranking

79 out of 100

ChainChoice Score

The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.

High evidence confidence
$48 your cost/yr

Is Bitstamp right for you?

Right for you if these matter most

Trading cost8/10; the category best is 9
Withdrawal track record8/10; the category best is 9
Licence coverage8/10; the category best is 9
Asset protection8/10, the category best

Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global, Europe, United States, Asia.

to test where you can use it.

The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto exchange shows where it lands for you.

What will Bitstamp cost you?

$48 your cost/yr

How do you buy?: Trading
Your monthly volume: $1k
How you buy: Pro interface
Pro taker fee: 0.4%

$3.00 above the median of 16 priced exchanges.

How this is calculated

How safe is Bitstamp?

Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read August 2026.
Incidents1 dated incident on the verified record; the latest, withdrawal halt, January 2015.
LicenceMiCA (EU): authorised by CSSF (Luxembourg) since 15 May 2025. Passported: All 27 EU member states + EEA. The register record
On the registersMiCA: authorised, Bitstamp Europe S.A. (LU, since 2025-05-15). Read 3 November 2026. Open the registerNYDFS BitLicense: authorised, Bitstamp USA, Inc. (US-NY, since 2019-04). Read 3 November 2026. Register

Open the evidence

Alternatives to Bitstamp

Compare all 4

1Bybit2 points above · stronger on withdrawal track record (9 against 8)81 out of 100$12
3Upbit3 points below · stronger on trading cost (9 against 8)76 out of 100$6.00
4Binance4 points below · weaker on trading cost (5 against 8)75 out of 100$12

View all 17 ranked exchanges

Provider at a glance

Category: Exchanges
Headquarters: London, UK
Bitstamp Ltd. The address printed in the bitstamp.net footer. Crypto-asset services are provided by different Bitstamp entities depending on client residency, among them Bitstamp Europe S.A. (registered at 40, avenue Monterey, Luxembourg) and, for US residents, Bitstamp USA, Inc.
Founded: 2011
Operating since
Supported assets: 80+
80+ cryptocurrencies. Varies by region (the brochure's own footnote). From Bitstamp's institutional 'Bitstamp as a Service' brochure (undated PDF on its own asset host); the retail pages read print no count.
Monthly volume (reported): ~$10.4B
2026-09-23 to 2026-10-22. Reported, not verified: CoinGecko's public API (no key) /exchanges/{id}/volume_chart?days=30 returns 30 daily points, each the 24-hour spot volume in BTC CoinGecko reports for that venue at 00:00 UTC. volumeBtc is their sum; volumeUsd multiplies each day's BTC volume by CoinGecko's BTC/USD price at the same timestamp (/coins/bitcoin/market_chart?vs_currency=usd&days=30&interval=daily) and sums. CoinGecko's figure covers the markets it tracks for the venue and is not the venue's own number. Published in US dollars; with your country set it is shown in your currency at the ECB reference rate.
(30-day, CoinGecko)
Official website: bitstamp.net

Independent rankingchecked 3 November 2026How it works

Details

Scored 79 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in August 2026.

For your setup

Find out if Bitstamp fits you

The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Bitstamp lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.

A few questions
No account required
Ranking-blind: no commercial input
Personalised in under 60 seconds

Find my best crypto exchangeNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.

Why this rank

Why Bitstamp ranks #2

Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (25.6 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 4.

4 published criteria · Σ weight 100

CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence

8+7.687.09#3/17Loading evidence…

8+7.177.09#3/17Loading evidence…

8+6.148.09#3/17Loading evidence…

8+4.617.08#1/17Loading evidence…

Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero

Margin−2behind Bybit, #1

RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 77–81 and stays #2

Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link

What would move the rank

Each line is the ranking run again with one of Bitstamp’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print? 8 → 10 on its ladder · passes Bybit+281#2 → #1

When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know? 8 → 10 on its ladder · passes Bybit+281#2 → #1

Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register? 8 → 10 on its ladder · passes Bybit+281#2 → #1

If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms? 8 → 10 on its ladder · passes Bybit+281#2 → #1

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print? 8 → 6 on its ladder · Upbit passes it−275#2 → #3

When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know? 8 → 6 on its ladder · Upbit passes it−276#2 → #3

Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register? 8 → 5 on its ladder · Upbit passes it−375#2 → #4

Smallest climb: “What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print?” 8 → 10 passes Bybit, #1.

Strengths

Where it leads

4 from the score data

Best for readers who weight

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print? — 8/10, category best 9/10
When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know? — 8/10, category best 9/10
Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register? — 8/10, category best 9/10
If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms? — 8/10, the category best

Tradeoffs

Where it trails

0 from the score data

No scored criterion trails the category best by two points or more, so no tradeoff can be stated from the data.

Record watch-outs

The venue a beginner meets is not the venue in the tier table: the default-looking retail surfaces cost 4% (card Instant Purchase) or a fixed 1.8% spread plus up to 0.5% volatility spread (Basic Trading), an order of magnitude above the 0.30%/0.40% order-book entry tier — and if you ever leave, Bitstamp force-converts remaining crypto to fiat at termination and keeps fiat balances under 25 EUR/USD (non-US).

Competitive position

Where Bitstamp leads and where it trails

Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.

Availability#1 / 1714.0 of 20 · pool best

Published criteria#2 / 1719.2 of 30 · best 20.1

Friction#1 / 172.7 of 10 · constant here

Trust record#1 / 173.2 of 8 · constant here

Measured data#10 / 177.9 of 18 · best 13.8

Where Bitstamp leads

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print?#3 / 17
When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know?#3 / 17
Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register?#3 / 17
If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms?#1 / 17

Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.

Closest alternatives

The 3 nearest rows by score

Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.

Browse all 17

Bybit#1 of 17 · score 81 · 2.0 points ahead

Bitstamp leads on

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print?8 vs 7
Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register?8 vs 6
If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms?8 vs 5

Bybit leads on

When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know?9 vs 8

Largest single reason Bybit is ahead: measured data (+13.8 display points).Scenario cost: Bybit is −$36 against Bitstamp.

Compare View verdict for Bybit

Upbit#3 of 17 · score 76 · 3.0 points behind

Bitstamp leads on

If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms?8 vs 7

Upbit leads on

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print?9 vs 8
Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register?9 vs 8

Largest single reason Bitstamp is ahead: availability (+20.8 display points).Scenario cost: Upbit is −$42 against Bitstamp.

Compare View verdict for Upbit

Binance#4 of 17 · score 75 · 4.0 points behind

Bitstamp leads on

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print?8 vs 5
When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know?8 vs 7
Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register?8 vs 5

Binance leads onNo scored criterion

Largest single reason Bitstamp is ahead: published criteria (+13.0 display points).Scenario cost: Binance is −$36 against Bitstamp.

Compare View verdict for Binance

Against the leader

Why Bybit ranks above Bitstamp

81 vs 79 · gap 2.0

The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 2.0 to within rounding. Bitstamp is ahead on published criteria (+6.5 in its favour).

DimensionThisBybitGap share

Availability · 23% weight14.012.0+5.2, better

Published criteria · 35% weight19.216.7+6.5, better

Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same

Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same

Measured data · 21% weight7.913.2−13.8, worse

Published criterionThisBybitPoints

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print? · w3087+0.96, better

When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know? · w2889−0.90, worse

Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register? · w2486+1.54, better

If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms? · w1885+1.73, better

Net7981−2.0

Compare with #1 Bybit

Your scenario

What Bitstamp costs on your scenario

The fee you actually pay on your volume for a year — the instant-buy spread, or the pro taker fee if you use that interface. A venue showing no instant-buy figure does not publish one; that is the finding, not a gap in our data. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.

your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own

Your monthly volumeHow you buy

How do you buy?

$1k a month × 12 months × 0.4% pro taker fee = $48 / year

How do you buy? · your inputTrading

Your monthly volume · your input$1k

How you buy · your inputPro interface

Pro taker fee · published rate0.4%

Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 29 September 2026.

your cost/yr

$48

Under the default inputs · USD

Category median$4516 of 17 rows priced · Bitstamp +$3.00 vs median

Cheapest priced$6.00 · UpbitBitstamp costs +$42 more · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Upbit

Cost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.

1 of 17 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.

Evidence

Evidence read 18 August 2026

One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.

4 of 4 cells scored

Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts

4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.

Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL

The receipt file has not been read yet.

Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness

4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.

RobustnessHoldsrank #2 across every one-point re-run

Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.

The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 18 August 2026.

Reading the evidence ledger…

CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt

What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print?strength 8 · weight 30Report an errorno source page—18 August 2026*

Unknown

No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.

No receipt

A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.

When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know?strength 8 · weight 28Report an errorno source page—18 August 2026*

Unknown

No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.

No receipt

A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.

Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register?strength 8 · weight 24Report an errorno source page—18 August 2026*

Unknown

No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.

No receipt

A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.

If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms?strength 8 · weight 18Report an errorno source page—18 August 2026*

Unknown

No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.

No receipt

A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.

* category-wide reading date; the cell carries none of its own.Report an error from any row. Reviewed within 7 days.

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores

Custody failure (Bitstamp 8/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
Scored by When this venue broke, did people get their money out — and how would I know? · 28%
Insolvency failure (Bitstamp 8/10): the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.
Scored by If this exchange fails — or freezes me — are the coins legally mine, and on whose terms? · 18%
Regulatory failure (Bitstamp 8/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
Scored by Whose licence actually covers me in my country — and can I find it on the register? · 24%

Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What will I actually pay here at my volume — including the spread they don't print? (30%).

Facts

What the record publishes

facts, not scores

Pricing: Bitstamp fee schedule, read 29 September 2026 at https://www.bitstamp.net/fee-schedule/ ("Unified Fee Schedule", "Valid from 1 September 2026"; plain curl receives an Incapsula bot shell, the text was read through a rendering fetch). Trading fees (all pairs), 30-day USD volume, Standard maker / taker: "< $10,000" "0.30%" / "0.40%"; "> $10,000" "0.20%" / "0.30%"; "> $100,000" "0.10%" / "0.20%"; "> $500,000" "0.08%" / "0.18%"; "> $1,500,000" "0.06%" / "0.16%"; "> $5,000,000" "0.03%" / "0.12%"; "> $20,000,000" "0.02%" / "0.10%"; "> $50,000,000" "0.01%" / "0.08%"; "> $100,000,000" "0.00%" / "0.06%"; "> $250,000,000" "0.00%" / "0.05%"; "> $1,000,000,000" "0.00%" / "0.03%" (separate reduced FX/Stablecoin and USDT columns). Basic Trading (the retail simple-buy surface): "Basic Spread (fixed)" "Stablecoins: 0.5%" / "Other crypto-assets: 1.8%", plus a "Volatility Spread (variable)" of "0% to 0.5%". Card and wallet buys: "Instant Service" "4%" "(your card issuer may charge additional fees)". Fiat exits: SEPA withdrawal "3.00 EUR"; ACH withdrawal "Free of charge"; Faster Payments (UK) withdrawal "2.00 GBP"; international wire withdrawal "0.1%" "(min fee = 25 USD/EUR/GBP, 35 SGD. Your bank may charge additional fees.)". Crypto exits: "The exact crypto withdrawal fee is disclosed before you confirm the cryptocurrency withdrawal." New on the page since the August read: an "Inactive account maintenance fee" of "5.00 EUR/USD/GBP per month" after six months without activity (Bitstamp Limited clients, US residents excluded), and "Crypto services accessed via the Robinhood Platform" "Free of charge" for Bitstamp UK clients using that route. Account termination (non-US): "The minimum fiat currency balance that can be returned to you upon account termination is 25 EUR/USD."Bitstamp — official page at www.bitstamp.net ↗ · 29 September 2026
Prices published in: USDBitstamp — official page at www.bitstamp.net ↗ · 29 September 2026
Licences held: Not published
Compliance level: partial
Regulatory note: The venue itself publishes an entity-matched map with licence numbers, read on the fee-schedule footer (https://web.archive.org/web/20260804052312/https://www.bitstamp.net/fee-schedule/): 'Crypto-assets services are provided by the following Bitstamp legal entities depending on client residency: (1) Bitstamp Europe S.A., which is authorized by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier …'
Supported chains: Not published
Markets served: global, europe, us, asia
Primary markets: Not published
Restricted markets: Not published
Operating limits: Not published
Availability note: Market structure, not one flag: 'Crypto-assets services are provided by the following Bitstamp legal entities depending on client residency' — Bitstamp Europe S.A. (EU/EEA via MiCA passport), Bitstamp UK Ltd. (UK, MLR registration), Bitstamp USA, Inc. (US: eligibility clause requires you 'reside in the United States or U.S. territories'), Bitstamp Asia Pte Ltd (Singapore), Bitstamp Global Ltd. (BVI, rest of world) — fee-schedule footer, capture 4 August 2026. The US ToU carries the standard OFAC/sanctions representation ('are not identified as a "Specially Designated National" by the Office of Foreign Assets Control'), which is an eligibility rule applying everywhere, NOT a regional footprint; the only true market restrictions found are the entity-routing above and 'Derivatives trading is not available to customers in the US, Canada, Japan and some other countries.' Status page also notes 'Availability of assets and trading pairs may vary by region and legal entity'.

Legal entity on file: Bitstamp, placed in 2 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.

Failure record

Incident timeline

Dated events at Bitstamp that a verified research record holds, newest first: the record’s own words, the date it gives, the source, and what ChainChoice’s read did where the record links the two.

Reading the incident record for Bitstamp.

When an event that meets the extraordinary-review rule is found, the placement is re-read within 72 hours and carries a label until then. The timeline itself never moves a score. How reviews work

If something goes wrong with Bitstamp: where to complain, and where to report a scam

Loading the routes for your country.

Reviewed 18 August 2026

Re-read in progress

Overdue; re-read by 10 November 2026.

Methodology v2026.10.18

How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

History

What the record carries

Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.

17 methodology entries

18 August 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 79, #2 of 17. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
28 October 2026
2026.10.16
Two EEA exchanges join the ranking: Bit2Me and Gate EU; KuCoin EU is refused while suspended
- added Exchanges: Bit2Me enters at #8 (65) and Gate EU at #9 (64), each scored on the four published criteria from its own terms, fee pages and proof-of-reserves page. Bybit stays #1 (81).
- changed Exchanges: no criterion score of a venue already ranked changed. The measured-data term places each venue's published taker fee against the pool's, and with 16 venues it moves these rows: Bitstamp #2 81 → #2 80; Upbit #3 77 → #3 76; Luno #6 69 → #6 70; Bitvavo #8 64 → #10 63; Kraken #9 60 → #11 60; VALR #10 60 → #12 59; Gemini #11 48 → #13 48; CoinDCX #12 47 → #14 46; Mercado Bitcoin #13 43 → #15 41; Bitso #14 41 → #16 41. In Find my best, a reader who answers that serious licences in major markets are enough, or that access comes first, now gets Bybit ahead of Bitstamp: the two had tied at 81, and Bitstamp now scores 80.
- added Exchanges, country pages: Bit2Me is newly listed in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates; Gate EU is newly listed in Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden. Bitstamp still leads the EEA and Norway pages and Bybit the other four. In the reader's-country order of each EEA country that has one, Bit2Me and Gate EU enter right after Coinbase.
- changed Exchanges: Gate's refusal now names its global platform only, re-read on 28 October 2026. KuCoin EU is refused as not live: its site's banner reads "KuCoin EU trading and deposit services were suspended at 14:30 (UTC+1) on February 4, 2026.", and its announcement of 20 February 2026 says a temporary restriction on new business activities remains in place after a notice from Austria's FMA. KuCoin's global refusal is re-dated. WhiteBIT's refusal is re-dated with the same day's read of whitebit.eu, which takes waitlist sign-ups only.
28 October 2026
2026.10.14
An exchange's fee is scored at the rate the entity serving the reader's country charges
- changed Exchanges and onramps: the fee term of the score reads the rate of the entity that serves the reader's country (taker fee, spread); with no country, the record's base rate. Replaces 2026.10.13's dearest rate.
- added A country whose rates differ from the base records has its own order, the questionnaire run for that country: /best with the country set, Find my best, compare and the country landing print it. 22 questionnaire countries (the EEA ones and the United States) have one for exchanges.
- added A row whose serving entity's rate was not read carries "regional rate not read" (Coinbase for EEA, UK and US readers: its retail fee table is behind sign-in; Kraken and Bybit for UK readers; OKX outside the EEA and the US, whose global page could not be loaded).
- changed OKX: the 0.20% / 0.10% spot-only rate is the EEA entity's and applies to EEA readers only; OKX has no base rate, so its published fee term is neutral.
28 October 2026
2026.10.13
A venue that charges by entity is priced for each reader by the entity that serves them, and scored on its dearest entity's rate
- changed Exchanges and onramps: the fee term of the score reads the dearest entry rate a venue publishes for any of its entities (taker fee, spread), not the rate of one entity.
- added Pricing records carry regional entries (entity, verbatim quote, source, read date); every cost a reader sees, on the list, the provider page and the country page, is computed on the entry for their country.
- changed Exchange scores this rule gave, before and after; 2026.10.14 replaced it in the same release, so they were never the published order: Bitstamp 79 to 81 (#3 to #1), Bybit 81 to 78 (#1 to #2), Upbit 76 to 78 (#4 to #3), Binance 75 to 76 (#5 to #4), OKX 80 to 73 (#2 to #5), Coinbase 69 to 71, Luno 69 to 70, Bitvavo 62 to 69, VALR 58 to 62 (#10 to #9), Kraken 60 to 62 (#9 to #10), CoinDCX 45 to 51 (#12 to #11), Gemini 48 to 49 (#11 to #12), Mercado Bitcoin 42 to 44. Bitso is unchanged at 41 (#14).
- added On every build three checks fail: a price without the currency it is billed in, a regional entry its quote does not bear out or a venue with a separate EEA entity and no EEA rate, and a provider that no longer operates still carrying a price.

Full methodology changelog

Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt exchange:bitstamp:2026.10.18:abe31da23876

How this verdict was produced

Are you Bitstamp? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.

Show this rank on your site

Editorial review of Bitstamp , on file since April 2026 — the review is separate from the score.