Provider at a glance
- Category
- Crypto Gift Cards
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- bitrefill.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 81 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Bitrefill
Gift cards and mobile top-ups for crypto
Crypto Gift Cards
#1 Overall
Ranked #1 of 8 crypto gift cards in the published ranking
81
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Bitrefill right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you8/10; the category best is 9
- Can you see the number before you commit9/10, the category best
- Reach and identity cost8/10; the category best is 9
- What happens when the code will not redeem7/10, the category best
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto gift card service shows where it lands for you.
What will Bitrefill cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Payments per month
- 500
- Average payment
- $100
How safe is Bitrefill?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Bitrefill
Compare all 4- 2Coincards9 points below · stronger on anchor cost (9 against 8)72
- 3CryptoRefills10 points below · stronger on coverage and access (9 against 8)71
- 4Coinsbee19 points below · weaker on anchor cost (4 against 8)62
For your setup
Find out if Bitrefill fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Bitrefill lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto gift card serviceNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why it leads
Why Bitrefill ranks #1
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (25.9 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 2 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
408+10.243.59#2/8Loading evidence…
259+7.205.09#1/8Loading evidence…
208+5.127.59#2/8Loading evidence…
157+3.364.57#1/8Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin+9over Coincards, #2
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 81 and stays #1
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Bitrefill’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you 8 → 4 on its ladder · Coincards passes it−479#1 → #2
Can you see the number before you commit 9 → 3 on its ladder · Coincards passes it−679#1 → #2
Reach and identity cost 8 → 1 on its ladder · Coincards passes it−780#1 → #2
Strengths
4 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you — 8/10, category best 9/10
- Can you see the number before you commit — 9/10, the category best
- Reach and identity cost — 8/10, category best 9/10
- What happens when the code will not redeem — 7/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
0 from the score dataWhere it trails
No scored criterion trails the category best by two points or more, so no tradeoff can be stated from the data.
Record watch-outs
- The pool's sharpest redemption trap: the Amazon account you redeem into must already carry a second payment method and a verified USA address, and if Amazon flags the account Bitrefill states it cannot obtain or provide a refund. You are also paying about $2 more than CoinCards charges for the identical code, in exchange for a materially better refund clause.
Competitive position
Where Bitrefill leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 814.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#1 / 819.4 of 30 · pool best
Friction#1 / 82.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 83.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 88.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Bitrefill leads
- What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you#2 / 8
- Can you see the number before you commit#1 / 8
- Reach and identity cost#2 / 8
- What happens when the code will not redeem#1 / 8
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Coincards#2 of 8 · score 72 · 9.0 points behind
Bitrefill leads on
- Reach and identity cost8 vs 7
- What happens when the code will not redeem7 vs 2
Coincards leads on
- What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you9 vs 8
Largest single reason Bitrefill is ahead: availability (+5.2 display points).Scenario cost: Coincards has no verified pricing for this scenario.
CryptoRefills#3 of 8 · score 71 · 10.0 points behind
Bitrefill leads on
- What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you8 vs 6
- Can you see the number before you commit9 vs 6
- What happens when the code will not redeem7 vs 5
CryptoRefills leads on
- Reach and identity cost9 vs 8
Largest single reason Bitrefill is ahead: published criteria (+10.1 display points).Scenario cost: CryptoRefills has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Coinsbee#4 of 8 · score 62 · 19.0 points behind
Bitrefill leads on
- What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you8 vs 4
- Can you see the number before you commit9 vs 4
- What happens when the code will not redeem7 vs 5
Coinsbee leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Bitrefill is ahead: published criteria (+19.5 display points).Scenario cost: Coinsbee has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against #2
81 vs 72 · gap 9.0Why Bitrefill ranks above Coincards
DimensionThisCoincardsGap share
Availability · 23% weight14.012.0+5.2, better
Published criteria · 35% weight19.418.1+3.4, better
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisCoincardsPoints
What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you · w4089−1.28, worse
Reach and identity cost · w2087+0.64, better
What happens when the code will not redeem · w1572+2.40, better
Net8172+9.0
Your scenario
Bitrefill is not priced for this scenario
Percentage and fixed legs on each payment, for a year. Excludes chargebacks, FX markup and settlement fees priced separately. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Payments per month · your input500
Average payment · your input$100
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 24 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory medianNot priced0 of 8 rows priced
Cheapest pricedNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
8 of 8 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 24 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #1 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 24 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
What a $100 Amazon card actually costs youstrength 8 · weight 40Report an error—24 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Can you see the number before you commitstrength 9 · weight 25Report an error—24 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Reach and identity coststrength 8 · weight 20Report an error—24 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.What happens when the code will not redeemstrength 7 · weight 15Report an error—24 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Execution failure (Bitrefill 7/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.Scored by What happens when the code will not redeem · 15%
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Regulatory failure, Exit failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What a $100 Amazon card actually costs you (40%), Can you see the number before you commit (25%), Reach and identity cost (20%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- "100 USD $102.00" — the Amazon.com USA denomination ladder rendered in USD, fetched 24 September 2026. The full ladder on the same page: "5 USD $5.10", "10 USD $10.20", "20 USD $20.40", "50 USD $51.00", "100 USD $102.00", "200 USD $204.01", "500 USD $510.00", "1000 USD $1,020.00". No cashback, sats-back or discount is shown on this card. On 6 August 2026 the same rung read $101.99; Bitrefill's USD ladder moves by a cent or two intraday, so the honest statement remains 'about +2.0% over face', not a fixed cent figure. The origin returns HTTP 403 to plain requests; the ladder was read through a rendering fetch. A 25 September 2026 rendering fetch reproduced every rung except 200 USD, which read $204.00 that day.Bitrefill — official pricing page ↗ · 24 September 2026
- Prices published in
- USDBitrefill — official pricing page ↗ · 24 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Multi-chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Bitrefill: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 24 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 81, #1 of 8. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.7Forty-one more products are offered only where their own quoted terms serve- fixed 141 country exclusions on 31 rows, each the name of a country the row's own quoted terms exclude: for example Mercuryo Hungary, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia and Morocco; Gemini Custody the United Kingdom, Australia and the EU after its wind-down; Backed xStocks the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Nigeria, the Philippines and Venezuela.
- changed Thirteen rows list the only countries their terms serve: Coins.ph the Philippines, Spritz bill pay, Brex, Unchained, WisdomTree, Franklin BENJI and AnchorWatch the United States (with its territories for AnchorWatch), PRYPCO Mint the UAE, N26 crypto seven EU countries, Gemini Tokenized Stocks the EU, XNET the US, Canada and the UK, Coldbit Steel and MetaMask Card the countries they list.
- changed Published (no-country) orders do not move. Country results change: in India six categories each lose one row (bill pay, cards, off-ramps, P2P, seed backup, tokenised real estate), and bill pay there has no row confirmed available, so it shows the published order marked as such; country pages list 23 fewer rows (24,357 to 24,334). The grounding test now matches full country names in any case, which shows seven earlier exclusions were quoted all along: the named debt of unquoted exclusions falls from 40 to 33 pairs.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt gift_cards:bitrefill:2026.10.18:d03318491f8f
Are you Bitrefill? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.