Skip to main content
Organisation

AladdinDAO

2 placements on ChainChoice under AladdinDAO, each scored against its own category's pool and criteria — none currently #1. The placements are not averaged and not ranked against each other: a #1 exchange and a #6 crypto card are two different products in two different markets.

Yield Aggregators
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by Inherited dependency surface · 30% (Concentrator (AladdinDAO) 4/10)
    Scored by Loss record own and inherited · 30% (Concentrator (AladdinDAO) 5/10)
  • Control failure (Concentrator (AladdinDAO) 2/10): a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Strategy change control · 20%
Not assessed by this ranking: Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Total take-rate and whether it is published (20%).
Liquid Lockers
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by What happens if the base protocol changes or dies, and whether the wrapper can unwind at all · 20% (CLever (clevCVX, AladdinDAO) 4/10)
    Scored by Contract control and dated incident record of the wrapper itself · 20% (CLever (clevCVX, AladdinDAO) 6/10)
  • Control failure (CLever (clevCVX, AladdinDAO) 4/10): a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Who controls the votes and the bribes, and what reaches the depositor · 25%
  • Exit failure (CLever (clevCVX, AladdinDAO) 2/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
    Scored by The exit that does not exist: measured discount and any contractual redemption · 35%
Not assessed by this ranking: Regulatory failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.