Skip to main content
Organisation

OpenZeppelin

2 placements on ChainChoice under OpenZeppelin, each scored against its own category's pool and criteria — none currently #1. The placements are not averaged and not ranked against each other: a #1 exchange and a #6 crypto card are two different products in two different markets.

Relayers
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Liveness failure (OpenZeppelin Relayer 6/10): the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
    Scored by Exactly-once execution and stuck-queue recovery · 26%
  • Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
    Scored by What the relayer is authorised to do, and whether you can keep the address · 32% (OpenZeppelin Relayer 10/10)
    Scored by What a stolen API credential can do before anyone notices · 22% (OpenZeppelin Relayer 3/10)
    Scored by Where the gas float sits and how you get it back · 20% (OpenZeppelin Relayer 9/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Smart-Contract Audits
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure (OpenZeppelin 3/10): the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by Post-audit exploit record · 32%
  • Information failure (OpenZeppelin 3/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
    Scored by Accountability & reconstructability · 28%
Not assessed by this ranking: Liveness failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Method depth for your stack (24%), Price transparency (16%).