Skip to main content
Organisation

Biconomy

2 placements on ChainChoice under Biconomy, each scored against its own category's pool and criteria — none currently #1. The placements are not averaged and not ranked against each other: a #1 exchange and a #6 crypto card are two different products in two different markets.

Smart Accounts & Multisig
Biconomy (Nexus / MEE)
Rank#5 OverallScore62

#1 in this category: Squads Protocol

View verdict
Account Abstraction Infra
Biconomy
Rank#8 OverallScore44

#1 in this category: Candide

View verdict
Smart Accounts & Multisig
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure (Biconomy (Nexus / MEE) 7/10): the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by Audit depth of the deployed version + real exploit history · 35%
  • Control failure (Biconomy (Nexus / MEE) 3/10): a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Upgrade control and key holders · 25%
  • Key failure (Biconomy (Nexus / MEE) 2/10): your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Recovery paths and their documented failure modes · 20%
Not assessed by this ranking: Exit failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Published cost and chains you can actually reach (20%).
Account Abstraction Infra
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Exit failure (Biconomy 4/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
    Scored by Exit path without the vendor · 30%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Liveness failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Published price per user operation (30%), Markup on sponsored gas (20%), Verified mainnet chain coverage (20%).