Skip to main content
Your journey

category.cdp_stablecoins.label

category.cdp_stablecoins.promise

Starting path

Read the contracts, not the protocol's description of itself

CDP Stablecoins evaluated across liquidation mechanics you actually bear, what actually backs the coin, cost of the loan and who controls it, and observed peg behaviour under stress.
category.cdp_stablecoins.promise Reviewed on liquidation mechanics you actually bear, what actually backs the coin, cost of the loan and who controls it, and observed peg behaviour under stress.
Start with the smart category assistant or jump straight into quick questions. Both paths narrow to the same recommendation standard.
How we review
Recommendation first, comparison only if needed.
Reviewed and rechecked on the current cycle.
Commercial relationships disclosed before clickout.
Audit
Infrastructure
Methodology
2026.04.0
published 2026-04-27
Providers tracked
490+
across 51 categories
Last verified
2026-08-05
editorial freshness
Editorial board
4
audit-log live
Decision guide
What matters most before choosing in this category
The best CDP stablecoin path depends on whether you need transfers, payments, savings-like dollar exposure, or onchain utility. The important decision is not only which CDP stablecoin you use, but where and how you plan to use it.
Key question
What collateral are you posting, and how close to the liquidation ratio will you sit?
Key question
Will you mainly hold CDP stablecoins, transfer them, or use them inside onchain apps?
Key question
Would you rather face an auction, a stability pool, or a redemption queue on a bad day?
Current editor lead
Liquity V2 (BOLD)
Liquity v2: user-set interest rates, ETH and LST collateral
Data checked Aug 2026
Liquity v2: user-set interest rates, ETH and LST collateral. Strongest on cost of the loan and who controls it (9/10): The borrower sets the rate, so no governance body can raise it against an open position — structurally the second-strongest control in this set after Liquity v1's immutable fee. The catch is disclosed in the same docs: the upfront fee equals seven days of average interest, and rate changes inside seven days trigger a… Weakest on observed peg behaviour under stress (4/10): Trading at $1.001326 with only $30,002,187 circulating (DefiLlama, 2026-08-04). Protocol TVL is $70,035,327 against an all-time high of $180,025,138 on 2025-10-07 — a 61% decline in under ten months. The peg holds, but on a very short operating history and a market too small to absorb a large exit. Published price: Liquity docs: interest is 'determined by the rate you set yourself.' There is no protocol-set rate. An upfront borrowing fee is charged equal to seven days' worth of the average interest rate, and adjusting your rate within seven days incurs an additional…
Best for
Cost of the loan and who controls it — 9/10Liquidation mechanics you actually bear — 8/10What actually backs the coin — 8/10
Main tradeoff
The user-set rate is not the free lunch it appears. BOLD redemptions are routed to the lowest-interest-rate Troves first, so choosing a cheap rate directly buys you redemption exposure — your collateral gets swapped for debt repayment at exactly the moment BOLD trades below peg. Setting a competitive rate means continuously monitoring where everyone else set theirs, which is an active management burden Liquity v1 did not impose.
Verify before signup
Liquity docs: interest is 'determined by the rate you set yourself.' There is no protocol-set rate. An upfront borrowing fee is charged equal to seven days' worth of the average interest rate, and adjusting your rate within seven days incurs an additional premature adjustment fee.
Weighted criteria
Liquidation mechanics you actually bear35%
What actually backs the coin25%
Cost of the loan and who controls it20%
Observed peg behaviour under stress20%
Leading options
Shared shortlist for this category
These providers are pulled from the same category comparison catalog used in validation, so the category page, comparison page, and provider reviews stay aligned.
Liquity V2 (BOLD)
Liquity v2: user-set interest rates, ETH and LST collateral
Editor lead
Liquity v2: user-set interest rates, ETH and LST collateral. Strongest on cost of the loan and who controls it (9/10): The borrower sets the rate, so no governance body can raise it against an open position — structurally the second-strongest control in this set after Liquity v1's immutable fee. The catch is disclosed in the same docs: the upfront fee equals seven days of average interest, and rate changes inside seven days trigger a… Weakest on observed peg behaviour under stress (4/10): Trading at $1.001326 with only $30,002,187 circulating (DefiLlama, 2026-08-04). Protocol TVL is $70,035,327 against an all-time high of $180,025,138 on 2025-10-07 — a 61% decline in under ten months. The peg holds, but on a very short operating history and a market too small to absorb a large exit. Published price: Liquity docs: interest is 'determined by the rate you set yourself.' There is no protocol-set rate. An upfront borrowing fee is charged equal to seven days' worth of the average interest rate, and adjusting your rate within seven days incurs an additional…
Best for: Cost of the loan and who controls it — 9/10
Curve crvUSD
Curve's CDP using LLAMMA continuous soft liquidation instead of auctions
Curve's CDP using LLAMMA continuous soft liquidation instead of auctions. Strongest on liquidation mechanics you actually bear (9/10): LLAMMA converts collateral to crvUSD continuously across bands rather than closing the position. Curve's own docs: hard liquidation only occurs when 'the health of the loan is below 0%', and soft liquidation is explicitly 'not a hard-liquidation where your loan is immediately closed'. On-chain 2026-08-04 the nine mint… Weakest on observed peg behaviour under stress (6/10): Trading at $0.999075 with $226,200,217 circulating (DefiLlama, 2026-08-04) — within 10bps of peg. But protocol TVL is $72,731,204 against an all-time high of $347,592,713 on 2024-03-09, a 79% decline, so exit depth is materially thinner than the peg alone suggests. Published price: Live borrow rate read on-chain 2026-08-04 from the LLAMMA AMM of each Controller (ControllerFactory 0xC9332fdCB1C491Dcc683bAe86Fe3cb70360738BC): wstETH 2.06% APR, WBTC 2.06% APR, WETH 2.03% APR (per-second rate 6.454e-10, 6.460e-10, 6.386e-10 respectively…
Best for: Liquidation mechanics you actually bear — 9/10
Liquity V1 (LUSD)
Immutable ETH-only CDP, 110% minimum ratio, zero recurring interest
Immutable ETH-only CDP, 110% minimum ratio, zero recurring interest. Strongest on cost of the loan and who controls it (10/10): Zero recurring interest — the contract has no stability-fee accrual at all — and a one-time getBorrowingRate() of 0.50% verified on-chain. The parameters are immutable with no governance module, so unlike Sky (9.25–15.00%, executive-spell adjustable) or GHO (committee-adjustable 500bps per 2 days), the cost quoted at… Weakest on observed peg behaviour under stress (5/10): Trading at $1.005003 on 2026-08-04 — the largest deviation from $1 in this set, and it is a premium, not a discount. The 0.50% redemption rate creates a hard $1 floor that protects borrowers but leaves buyers systematically overpaying. Liquity v1 TVL is $207,885,854 against an all-time high of $4,523,319,569 on… Published price: Read on-chain 2026-08-04 from TroveManager 0xA39739EF8b0231DbFA0DcdA07d7e29faAbCf4bb2: getBorrowingRate() = 0.005 (0.50% one-time), getRedemptionRate() = 0.005 (0.50%). There is no recurring interest rate function because the protocol charges none. MCR() =…
Best for: Cost of the loan and who controls it — 10/10
Browse this network
Methodology
How this category is reviewed
Reviewed on liquidation mechanics you actually bear, what actually backs the coin, cost of the loan and who controls it, and observed peg behaviour under stress.
Reviewed on: Liquidation mechanics you actually bear, What actually backs the coin, Cost of the loan and who controls it, Observed peg behaviour under stress.
This page is a maintained category surface, not a static marketing block. Review freshness, provider positioning, and recommendation logic should stay consistent with quiz and provider pages.
Frequently asked
Questions people ask before choosing cdp stablecoins
When should I use CDP stablecoins instead of other crypto assets?
CDP Stablecoins make the most sense when you want more stable dollar-like value for payments, transfers, savings posture, or onchain use without the same volatility as broader crypto assets.
Are all CDP stablecoins basically the same?
No. CDP Stablecoins differ on issuer trust, redemption structure, chain support, ecosystem usage, and practical acceptance across wallets, exchanges, and apps.
What matters most when choosing a CDP stablecoin?
The liquidation mechanics you personally bear, and what onchain state shows actually backs the coin. One protocol here presents as a CDP while crypto-collateralised vaults are under 4% of its debt, and another publishes no protocol parameters at all.
REVIEWEDApr 2026METHOD4 criteriaCATEGORYcdp_stablecoins
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
Octopus · The AI CFO that pays for itself

Audit your entire crypto stack — free.

Score concentration, fees, security, and tax complexity across exchanges, wallets, staking, and DeFi.

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research

ChainChoice provides informational content only. Nothing on this site constitutes financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

Methodology
6-dimension rubric. Weights published.
Data freshness
Live data, refreshed hourly. Independent rankings. We show our work.
Disclosure
Educational analysis, not investment advice. Affiliate links may contribute to operations but never alter rankings.
ChainChoice · The decision layer for crypto · Not financial advice490+ providers · 51 categories · Computed, not voted · © 2026
Where we’re positionedChainChoice is currently positioned for European Union · United Kingdom · Switzerland. Recommendations and risk warnings are tuned for these jurisdictions. The site is reachable globally, but provider availability, regulatory framing, and tax guidance only fully apply in the listed regions. Expanding to United States, Canada, Australia, Singapore, Japan, UAE, India, and Brazil through 2026 — pick your region from the radar to see what currently applies.